VS

Skoda Karoq vs Honda CR-V comparison

Compare performance (190 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Karoq or Honda CR-V?

Skoda Karoq vs Honda CR-V: Key differences

Skoda Karoq

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • only slightly more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter

Honda CR-V

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more efficient
  • moderately more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Karoq

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Karoq is significantly cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Honda CR-V costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,689 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Honda CR-V uses 2.6 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Skoda Karoq with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 2.3 L/100km.

CR-V

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Karoq offers only slightly more power – delivering 190 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 6 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Karoq is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Honda CR-V takes 9 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Karoq delivers marginally more torque with 360 Nm compared to 335 Nm. That’s about 25 Nm more.

Karoq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Karoq is markedly lighter – 1,380 kg compared to 1,821 kg. The difference is around 441 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Honda CR-V offers moderately more boot space – 617 L compared to 521 L. That’s a difference of about 96 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Karoq carries a bit more – 549 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 74 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Honda CR-V is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £42,800
CR-V

Honda CR-V

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 78 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Kia Sportage
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Kia Sportage flaunts a bolder design, plush cabin and tech-heavy kit that feels like buying the future — perfect if you want comfort and a bit of showmanship on your commute. The Skoda Karoq plays the sensible sibling: conservative looks, clever packaging, enjoyable handling and better value, …
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
Skoda Karoq
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Karoq

The Skoda Karoq is a smart, unfussy compact SUV that blends roomy practicality with a pleasantly composed driving character. It won’t turn heads at a car meet, but it will make daily life easier with clever storage, sensible ergonomics and a reassuringly grown-up ride.

details
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113497
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113477
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113491
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113481
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113494

Reviews Skoda Karoq

4.6 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Honda CR-V

The Honda CR-V blends sensible practicality with a polished feel, offering roomy interiors and a confident ride that keeps commutes and weekend escapes equally comfortable. Its unshowy styling and reliable reputation make it a smart, low‑drama choice for buyers who want versatility without fuss — the kind of car that quietly makes everyday life a little easier.

details
42223_CR-V_2015
42220_CR-V_2015
42219_CR-V_2015
42241_CR-V_2015

Reviews Honda CR-V

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
Yvi
18 Mar 2026, 18:55:49

Good car, very comfortable. It still drinks petrol — I do a lot of driving, so the hybrid system only makes itself felt in traffic jams....

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Hyundai Tucson delivers futuristic styling, a roomy, tech-rich cabin and punchy powertrains that make it the practical yet showy family SUV in this duel. The Skoda Karoq, meanwhile, trades flash for cleverness — smaller and sharper to drive with brilliant storage solutions and better everyday …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
Skoda Karoq
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
We line up the Skoda Karoq against the Toyota Corolla Cross to settle which compact SUV deserves your keys. The Karoq brings clever Czech packaging and Euro finesse, while the Corolla Cross answers with Toyota’s rock‑solid reliability and wallet‑friendly running costs—so read on if you prefer …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
The Honda CR‑V is the sensible family SUV — cavernous boot, comfortable ride and rock‑solid reliability that keeps running costs down, while the Volvo XC40 tempts you with Scandi styling, cutting‑edge safety tech and a more premium, tactile cabin. Choose the CR‑V for everyday practicality and …
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stands out with its sleek design and efficiency, making it an ideal choice for urban adventures, while the Skoda Karoq offers remarkable practicality and interior space, appealing to families and long-distance travelers. Both crossovers come equipped with a suite of advanced …
Skoda Karoq
VW T-Roc
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible family hero — roomy boot, comfortable seats and clever practicality — while the VW T‑Roc swaps some of that pragmatism for sharper styling and a livelier, more involving drive. Choose the Karoq for space and value, the T‑Roc if you want personality and a bit more fun …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of the crossovers, the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 stand out with distinct personalities. The CR-V, known for its reliability and value, excels in practicality with a spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the XC60's luxurious design and advanced safety …
Skoda Karoq
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Unsure whether the Skoda Karoq or the Skoda Enyaq is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Skoda Karoq
Honda CR-V

Costs and Consumption
Price
29,100 - 41,700 £
Price
42,800 - 52,100 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
78 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
128 - 173 g/km
co2
59 - 152 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,380 - 1,655 kg
Curb weight
1,821 - 1,988 kg
Trunk capacity
521 L
Trunk capacity
579 - 617 L
Length
4,390 mm
Length
-
Width
1,841 mm
Width
1,866 mm
Height
1,624 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,630 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
456 - 549 kg
Payload
439 - 475 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
Power HP
184 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 9.5 s
Max Speed
192 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Torque
335 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
Power kW
135 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,993 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, B
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Honda
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Karoq have?

The Skoda Karoq is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.