VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs Audi Q3 comparison

Compare performance (265 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 38,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Audi Q3?

Skoda Kodiaq vs Audi Q3: Key differences

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • only slightly cheaper
  • moderately more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
  • substantially more trunk space

Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Kodiaq is only slightly cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 351 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Audi Q3 with 1.7 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers only slightly more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 3 km more than the Audi Q3.

Q3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers very slightly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 7 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.

Both models offer the same torque – 400 Nm.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q3 is barely lighter – 1,635 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 49 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers substantially more boot space – 910 L compared to 488 L. That’s a difference of about 422 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries very slightly more – 563 kg compared to 535 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Skoda Kodiaq
Audi Q3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.

details
A188605_overfull
A188610_overfull
A188613_overfull
A1814467_overfull
A188626_overfull

Reviews Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
dd
2 Nov 2025, 22:05:04

Very comfortable. Precise steering. E35 petrol engine, 150 hp — sufficient. Manual gearbox very good and well-geared. Looks very handsome. Very large boot. Premium interior.

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Audi Q3
Audi Q4 e-tron
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact luxury SUVs, the Audi Q3 and Audi Q4 e-tron present distinct offerings tailored to different preferences. The Q3 impresses with its spirited performance and traditional gasoline engine, while the Q4 e-tron showcases Audi's commitment to electrification with a …
Audi Q3
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Audi Q3 dresses up compact-SUV practicality in premium polish — plush interior, refined ride and tech that whispers “grown-up” refinement. The CUPRA Terramar, by contrast, prowls with sharper handling, punchier engines and a sporty attitude that’ll make you smile even if the mpg takes a hit, so …
Skoda Kodiaq
Audi Q3

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
39 - 195 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Length
4,758 mm
Length
-
Width
1,864 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
505 - 535 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
226 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Audi
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kodiaq have?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.