Compare performance (265 HP vs 326 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 38,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or BMW X1?
In the bustling world of compact SUVs, the BMW X1 and the Skoda Kodiaq have emerged as strong contenders. Both vehicles are designed to offer the perfect blend of performance, comfort, and innovation. But how do they stack up against each other? Let's delve into the technical aspects and innovations that distinguish these two models.
The BMW X1 comes with a variety of engine options, including diesel, petrol, and hybrid powertrains. It boasts an impressive power range from 136 HP to 326 HP, making it a versatile choice for both city drives and highway commutes. The top speed reaches up to 250 km/h, and acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h ranges from 5.4 to 9.2 seconds. This model is available in both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations.
On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq also provides a compelling array of engine choices, spanning from conventional petrol and diesel engines to plug-in hybrids. The Kodiaq's power ranges from 150 HP to 265 HP with maximum speeds up to 231 km/h. Acceleration figures are competitive, ranging from 6.3 to 9.7 seconds. Similar to the X1, it offers both front-wheel and all-wheel drive options.
When it comes to technical innovations, the BMW X1 shines with a well-rounded offering of modern technology. The dual-clutch automatic transmission promises smooth gear transitions, while the plug-in hybrid variant boasts an electric range of up to 83 km, thanks to a 14.2 kWh battery capacity.
The Skoda Kodiaq aims to impress with its own set of innovations. It offers a larger electric range of up to 123 km, benefiting from a more substantial 19.7 kWh battery. The dual-clutch automatic transmission also features prominently in the Kodiaq lineup, ensuring an effortless driving experience.
Both SUVs make a bold statement on the road. The BMW X1, with its dimensions of approximately 4500 mm in length and 1845 mm in width, presents a sporty and compact profile. It stands at a height range of 1622 mm to 1642 mm, offering agility and ease of parking in urban settings.
In contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq is slightly more extensive, with a length of around 4761 mm and a width of 1864 mm. Its height ranges from 1663 mm to 1683 mm, providing a more commanding presence on the road and a spacious interior environment.
Both models provide comfortable seating for up to five passengers. The BMW X1 offers a trunk capacity between 490 L and 540 L, making it suitable for daily errands and weekend getaways. Its premium interior materials and advanced technology options cater to a luxurious experience.
Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq stands out with its expansive trunk capacity of up to 910 L, ideal for families and long-haul travelers needing additional storage space. The interior of the Kodiaq is designed with practicality and comfort in mind, balancing quality materials with user-friendly features.
Considering environmental efficiency, the BMW X1's CO2 emissions range from 17 to 175 g/km, with various engine and hybrid configurations offering flexibility in reducing environmental impact. The Skoda Kodiaq, with CO2 emissions ranging from 9 to 186 g/km, offers competitive efficiency, particularly with its plug-in hybrid variant.
In conclusion, both the BMW X1 and Skoda Kodiaq offer compelling packages, each with distinct strengths. The BMW X1 is ideal for those seeking performance versatility and cutting-edge tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq appeals to those needing more space and an extended electric range. Ultimately, the choice between these two rivals depends on personal preferences and specific needs, whether it's performance, space, or environmental considerations.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Kodiaq is marginally cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the BMW X1 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 351 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the BMW X1 with 2.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 41 km more than the BMW X1.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the BMW X1 offers moderately more power – delivering 326 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 61 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the BMW X1 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the BMW X1 is marginally faster – reaching 233 km/h, while the Skoda Kodiaq tops out at 226 km/h. The difference is around 7 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW X1 delivers slightly more torque with 477 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 77 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, BMW X1 is marginally lighter – 1,575 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 109 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more boot space – 910 L compared to 540 L. That’s a difference of about 370 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq offers visibly more capacity – up to 2,105 L, about 560 L more than the BMW X1.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries slightly more – 563 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 63 kg.
The Skoda Kodiaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
The BMW X1 brings a premium feel to compact crossover life, wrapping practical space and agile handling into a tidy, upscale package. It’s ideal for buyers who want BMW driving dynamics without the bulk, offering everyday comfort and a few clever tricks to keep the commute interesting.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
Price
38,200 - 55,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2.5 - 7.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
81 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
14.2 kWh
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
57 - 175 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 - 54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
Curb weight
1,575 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
490 - 540 L
|
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
Length
4,500 mm
|
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
Width
1,845 mm
|
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
1,630 - 1,642 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,495 - 1,545 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
490 - 500 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel MHEV, Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
136 - 326 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
Max Speed
190 - 233 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 477 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
100 - 240 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, B
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
BMW
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España