VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs Dacia Jogger comparison

Compare performance (265 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 15,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Dacia Jogger?

Skoda Kodiaq vs Dacia Jogger: Key differences

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space

Dacia Jogger

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • visibly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Dacia Jogger is considerably cheaper – starting at 15,400 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,457 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Dacia Jogger with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3 L/100km.

Jogger

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers considerably more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 107 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Dacia Jogger takes 8.9 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers significantly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm more.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Dacia Jogger offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Dacia Jogger is visibly lighter – 1,268 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 416 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeably more boot space – 910 L compared to 607 L. That’s a difference of about 303 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries only slightly more – 563 kg compared to 559 kg. That’s a difference of about 4 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Dacia Jogger
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Dacia Jogger is the no-nonsense family hero — seven seats, huge practicality and wallet-friendly running costs that make it perfect for school runs and flat-packed furniture missions. The Dacia Bigster ups the ante with SUV styling, more interior space and a tougher road presence, trading a bit …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Jogger

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Dacia Jogger

The Dacia Jogger is a no-nonsense family mover that stretches the idea of value with cavernous practicality and flexible space, perfect for buyers who need a sensible, everyday Swiss Army knife on wheels. It doesn’t try to be glamorous — instead it wins hearts with cheerful thrift, durable materials and honest engineering, giving you useful transport without the pretence.

details
d220423p
d220425p
d230002p
d220421p

Reviews Dacia Jogger

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
FF
3 Feb 2026, 16:18:17

The RAV4's boot is tiny. Pick the Jogger without hesitation — and pay €250 less per month.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Dacia Duster
Dacia Jogger
VS
The Dacia Duster is the rugged, no-nonsense compact SUV that feels ready for gravel tracks and weekend escapes without costing the earth — pick it if you want a bit of adventure in a brutally honest, affordable package. The Dacia Jogger, by contrast, is a clever, spacious seven-seater that trades …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Dacia Jogger

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Price
15,400 - 23,500 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 7.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
103 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
MPV
Seats
5
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Curb weight
1,268 - 1,463 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
160 - 607 L
Length
4,758 mm
Length
-
Width
1,864 mm
Width
1,784 mm
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
384 - 559 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid, LPG
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
110 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12 s
Max Speed
226 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
190 - 200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
81 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Dacia
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kodiaq have?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.