VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs Fiat Tipo Limousine comparison

Compare performance (265 HP vs 130 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Fiat Tipo Limousine?

Skoda Kodiaq vs Fiat Tipo Limousine: Key differences

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly more trunk space
details

Fiat Tipo Limousine

  • considerably cheaper
  • visibly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Fiat Tipo Limousine is considerably cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,743 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Fiat Tipo Limousine with 4.6 L/100km. The difference is about 3.1 L/100km.

Tipo Limousine

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers considerably more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 130 HP. That’s roughly 135 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Fiat Tipo Limousine takes 9.6 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers moderately more torque with 400 Nm compared to 320 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Fiat Tipo Limousine is visibly lighter – 1,375 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 309 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers significantly more boot space – 910 L compared to 520 L. That’s a difference of about 390 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries noticeably more – 563 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 138 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 119 - 122 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and VW Tayron are closely related midsize SUVs that focus on practicality and solid build quality, but they appeal to slightly different tastes and priorities. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the Kodiaq’s family-friendly versatility or the Tayron’s more …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Kodiaq target very different buyers: the Enyaq is an all-electric SUV focused on efficiency, modern tech and city-friendly driving, while the Kodiaq is a larger, traditional family SUV offering seven seats, greater towing and cargo capacity. This quick comparison highlights …
Skoda Kodiaq
Fiat Tipo Limousine

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Geert
5 May 2026, 08:49:23

The Skoda Kodiac looks sleeker and is bigger. The Ford Explorer is a bit smaller and there was such a fuss made about it, but it’s disappointing in looks and even worse on the inside.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Fiat Tipo Limousine

The Fiat Tipo sedan is a practical, no-nonsense family saloon that focuses on roomy, usable space and comfortable everyday driving rather than flashy pretence. It won't set pulses racing, but its sensible packaging, economical running costs and honest charm make it a smart pick for buyers who prefer substance over style.

details
serpimg_EoX4sL

Reviews Fiat Tipo Limousine

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Superb Combi
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Superb Combi is a roomy, practical estate that focuses on comfort and massive luggage space, while the Skoda Kodiaq is a taller, more versatile SUV that suits families needing optional seven-seat flexibility and a higher driving position. Choosing between them comes down to whether you …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Skoda Kodiaq
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and the Mitsubishi Outlander both aim at buyers needing a practical, family-friendly SUV, but they take different approaches—Kodiaq prioritizes space and refinement, while Outlander leans on value and versatility. This comparison highlights the strengths and trade-offs so you can …
Skoda Kodiaq
MG MGS9
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and the MG MGS9 are both family-sized SUVs that prioritise space and practicality, but they offer contrasting strengths — the Kodiaq leans on refinement and proven engineering, while the MGS9 trades on value and a feature-rich kit. This comparison focuses on interior space, driving …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and Skoda Kodiaq pit a stylish, tech-packed compact crossover against a larger, family-focused SUV with up to seven seats. I’ll compare space, comfort, driving character and running costs so you can decide which suits your needs.
Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
Fiat Tipo Limousine

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Price
17,100 - 17,600 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
120 - 121 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
4
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Curb weight
1,375 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
520 L
Length
-
Length
4,532 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Width
1,792 mm
Height
-
Height
1,497 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
130 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
210 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
320 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
96 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Fiat
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kodiaq have?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.