VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs Ford Tourneo Courier comparison

Compare performance (265 HP vs 136 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Ford Tourneo Courier?

Skoda Kodiaq vs Ford Tourneo Courier: Key differences

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • visibly more trunk space
details

Ford Tourneo Courier

  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Ford Tourneo Courier is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 16,063 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Ford Tourneo Courier with 6.6 L/100km. The difference is about 5.1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Ford Tourneo Courier offers clearly more range – reaching up to 320 km, about 198 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Tourneo Courier

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 129 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers noticeably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Tourneo Courier is slightly lighter – 1,517 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 167 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers visibly more boot space – 910 L compared to 570 L. That’s a difference of about 340 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries somewhat more – 563 kg compared to 483 kg. That’s a difference of about 80 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 119 - 122 km
Skoda Kodiaq
Ford Tourneo Courier

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details

Ford Tourneo Courier

The Ford Tourneo Courier is a cheeky, compact people carrier that turns urban errands into a pleasure, thanks to a spacious, cleverly packaged cabin and genuinely practical storage everywhere you look. It drives with reassuringly car-like manners, so the ride is comfy for school runs and shopping trips, and sensible touches like fold-flat seats, a high driving position and plentiful cubbies make it a smart, fuss-free choice for small families and weekend haulers.

details
Skoda Kodiaq
Ford Tourneo Courier

Costs and Consumption

Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Price
21,800 - 35,000 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.6 - 6.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
320 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
0 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Curb weight
1,517 - 1,545 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,864 mm
Width
1,800 - 1,813 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
480 - 483 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
125 - 136 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
92 - 100 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
998 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.