Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kodiaq vs Land Rover Range Rover Velar - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (265 HP vs 404 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 61900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Land Rover Range Rover Velar?
Kodiaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Skoda Kodiaq has a convincingly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Velar costs 61900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 25037 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar with 4.80 L. The difference is about 3.30 L per 100 km.
As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq performs significantly better – achieving up to 122 km, about 59 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
Range Rover Velar
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 404 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 139 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Land Rover Range Rover Velar performs minimal better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Skoda Kodiaq tops out at 231 km/h. The difference is around 19 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Land Rover Range Rover Velar pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 650 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kodiaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is somewhat lighter – 1684 kg compared to 2003 kg. The difference is around 319 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly perceptible more room – 910 L compared to 552 L. That’s a difference of about 358 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs noticeable better – up to 2105 L, which is about 747 L more than the Land Rover Range Rover Velar.
When it comes to payload, Land Rover Range Rover Velar hardly perceptible takes the win – 587 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Skoda Kodiaq
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
The Range Rover Velar marries sleek, pared-back styling with genuine off-road poise, so it looks at home in the city yet won’t flinch at rougher roads. Inside, a luxurious, tech-forward cabin pampers occupants while keeping the driving experience confidently in command — and yes, it somehow makes an SUV feel undeniably chic.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
Land Rover Range Rover Velar
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
Price
61900 - 87400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.8 - 10.2 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
63 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
15.40 kWh
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
110 - 232 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
62 - 83 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
Curb weight
2003 - 2280 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
503 - 552 L
|
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
Length
4797 mm
|
|
Width
1864 mm
|
Width
1933 mm
|
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
Height
1657 - 1665 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1335 - 1358 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
460 - 587 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
204 - 404 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
Max Speed
209 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
430 - 650 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
150 - 297 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1997 - 2997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, C
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?
The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.