Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kodiaq vs Renault Arkana comparison
Compare performance (265 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Renault Arkana?
Skoda Kodiaq vs Renault Arkana: Key differences
Renault Arkana
3.8 (6 Reviews)
Customer feedback generally presents the Arkana as an economical, stylish and practical family crossover that suits everyday needs. Owners often praise its fuel economy, space and safety, while noting it isn’t a sporty coupe; a few reports of serious mechanical issues and costly repairs also appear. Opinions are mixed enough that broader reliability trends aren’t fully clear from the available comments.
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Kodiaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Arkana is visibly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,420 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Renault Arkana with 4.7 L/100km. The difference is about 3.2 L/100km.
Arkana
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers considerably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 195 Nm more.
Kodiaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is somewhat lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 174 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries a bit more – 563 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 112 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Skoda Kodiaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £37,900
Skoda Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Kodiaq
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
Renault Arkana
The Arkana stands out with its striking coupe-SUV design, blending sporty aesthetics with practicality. Its bold silhouette and high ride height offer a unique presence on the road, attracting attention wherever it goes. Inside, the Arkana combines modern technology with comfort, making it a versatile choice for both city driving and weekend getaways.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
Renault Arkana
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
|
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
106 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
|
Curb weight
1,510 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
4,758 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,864 mm
|
Width
1,821 mm
|
|
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
451 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
226 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
205 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
105 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.