VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs SsangYong Torres comparison

Compare performance (265 HP vs 207 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 33,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or SsangYong Torres?

Skoda Kodiaq vs SsangYong Torres: Key differences

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • noticeably more trunk space

SsangYong Torres

  • slightly cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • somewhat lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

SsangYong Torres is slightly cheaper – starting at 33,800 £ , while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 37,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,029 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the SsangYong Torres with 7.9 L/100km. The difference is about 6.4 L/100km.

As for electric range, the SsangYong Torres offers considerably more range – reaching up to 462 km, about 340 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Torres

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 207 HP. That’s roughly 58 HP more horsepower.

Looking at top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq is a bit faster – reaching 226 km/h, while the SsangYong Torres tops out at 194 km/h. The difference is around 32 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers slightly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 339 Nm. That’s about 61 Nm more.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, SsangYong Torres is somewhat lighter – 1,498 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 186 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers noticeably more boot space – 910 L compared to 703 L. That’s a difference of about 207 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq offers markedly more capacity – up to 2,105 L, about 443 L more than the SsangYong Torres.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries only slightly more – 563 kg compared to 552 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Skoda Kodiaq
SsangYong Torres

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

5 (4 Reviews)
rate
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

SsangYong Torres

SsangYong Torres cuts a rugged, purposeful silhouette that feels more expensive than its price tag, offering generously practical packaging and a no-nonsense feature set. It drives with surprisingly assured manners and genuine off-road appetite, making it a clever choice for buyers who want real SUV capability without badge snobbery.

details
serpimg_HNB7qw

Reviews SsangYong Torres

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Honda CR-V
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Honda CR-V is the sensible all‑rounder — refined, reliable and especially tempting if you want a supple ride and frugal hybrid tech, while the Skoda Kodiaq is the bigger, more pragmatic family hauler with genuine seven‑seat practicality and a cavernous boot. Choose the CR‑V for urban ease and …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive realm of mid-sized SUVs, the Hyundai Tucson flaunts its modern design and advanced safety features, making it a compelling choice for tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the Skoda Kodiaq distinguishes itself with generous interior space and a versatile seating arrangement, appealing …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC90
VS
If you want pragmatic space and clever value, the Skoda Kodiaq is the family hauler that stretches your budget without feeling cheap; the Volvo XC90, by contrast, pampers with Scandinavian refinement, top-tier safety tech and a calmer motorway demeanour. Choose the Kodiaq for practical boots, …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Ford Kuga
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Ford Kuga and Skoda Kodiaq each offer unique strengths that cater to different drivers. The Kuga impresses with its agile handling and tech-savvy interior, making it a great choice for urban dwellers who value both style and functionality. Meanwhile, the …
Hyundai Santa Fe
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive mid-size SUV segment, the Hyundai Santa Fe and Skoda Kodiaq offer compelling options for families seeking versatility and comfort. The Hyundai Santa Fe impresses with its bold styling, advanced safety features, and an array of technology options, making it a strong contender for …
Skoda Kodiaq
SsangYong Torres

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Price
33,800 - 44,600 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7.9 - 9.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 kWh/100km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
462 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
0 - 207 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
58 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Curb weight
1,498 - 1,618 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
703 L
Length
4,758 mm
Length
4,700 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
1,679 - 1,683 mm
Height
1,710 mm
Max trunk capacity
2,105 L
Max trunk capacity
1,662 L
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
552 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
163 - 207 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
226 km/h
Max Speed
191 - 194 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
280 - 339 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
120 - 152 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
SsangYong
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kodiaq have?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.