VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs Toyota Prius comparison

Compare performance (265 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 39,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Toyota Prius?

Skoda Kodiaq vs Toyota Prius: Key differences

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • markedly more electric range
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Toyota Prius

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more efficient
  • marginally lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Skoda Kodiaq is marginally cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Toyota Prius costs 39,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,543 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota Prius uses 0.5 L/100km and is substantially more efficient than the Skoda Kodiaq with 1.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers markedly more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 36 km more than the Toyota Prius.

Prius

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers a bit more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 42 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Toyota Prius takes 6.8 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota Prius is marginally lighter – 1,620 kg compared to 1,684 kg. The difference is around 64 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly more boot space – 910 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 626 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries noticeably more – 563 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 188 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota Prius holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £39,400
Prius

Toyota Prius

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 223 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 0.5 - 0.7 L/100km
  • Electric Range 72 - 86 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and VW Tayron are closely related midsize SUVs that focus on practicality and solid build quality, but they appeal to slightly different tastes and priorities. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the Kodiaq’s family-friendly versatility or the Tayron’s more …
Skoda Kodiaq
MG MGS9
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and the MG MGS9 are both family-sized SUVs that prioritise space and practicality, but they offer contrasting strengths — the Kodiaq leans on refinement and proven engineering, while the MGS9 trades on value and a feature-rich kit. This comparison focuses on interior space, driving …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota Prius

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Geert
5 May 2026, 08:49:23

The Skoda Kodiac looks sleeker and is bigger. The Ford Explorer is a bit smaller and there was such a fuss made about it, but it’s disappointing in looks and even worse on the inside.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota Prius

The Prius glides through traffic like a wise commuter's secret weapon, balancing miserly running costs with an unflappable sense of reliability. It's not a thrill seeker, but its roomy cabin, sensible packaging and low-stress driving personality make it a brilliant choice for buyers who value peace of mind over pulse-raising performance.

details
78896-2022-prius-plug-in-hybrid-3-web-lr
78897-2022-prius-plug-in-hybrid-8-web-lr
78898-2022-prius-plug-in-hybrid-9-web-lr
78899-2022-prius-plug-in-hybrid-28-web-lr

Reviews Toyota Prius

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Skoda Kodiaq
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and the Mitsubishi Outlander both aim at buyers needing a practical, family-friendly SUV, but they take different approaches—Kodiaq prioritizes space and refinement, while Outlander leans on value and versatility. This comparison highlights the strengths and trade-offs so you can …
Skoda Kodiaq
Jaecoo 7
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and Jaecoo 7 are midsize SUVs aimed at families, but they're very different — the Kodiaq emphasizes European refinement, practicality and proven driving dynamics, while the Jaecoo 7 undercuts on price with generous tech and equipment from a newer Chinese brand. This comparison …
Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Kodiaq target very different buyers: the Enyaq is an all-electric SUV focused on efficiency, modern tech and city-friendly driving, while the Kodiaq is a larger, traditional family SUV offering seven seats, greater towing and cargo capacity. This quick comparison highlights …
CUPRA Terramar
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
Skoda Superb Combi
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Superb Combi is a roomy, practical estate that focuses on comfort and massive luggage space, while the Skoda Kodiaq is a taller, more versatile SUV that suits families needing optional seven-seat flexibility and a higher driving position. Choosing between them comes down to whether you …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota Prius

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Price
39,400 - 45,800 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 0.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
72 - 86 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
12 - 17 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Curb weight
1,620 - 1,630 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
284 L
Length
-
Length
4,599 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Width
1,782 mm
Height
-
Height
1,470 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
365 - 375 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
177 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
164 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,998 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2023
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kodiaq have?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.