Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Skoda Kodiaq vs VW Arteon - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (265 HP vs 320 HP), boot space and price (36800 £ vs 43300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or VW Arteon?
Kodiaq
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Kodiaq has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the VW Arteon costs 43300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6433 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 1.50 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the VW Arteon with 5.10 L. The difference is about 3.60 L per 100 km.
Arteon
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the VW Arteon has a somewhat edge – offering 320 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 55 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW Arteon is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 4.90 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.30 s. That’s about 1.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the VW Arteon performs minimal better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Skoda Kodiaq tops out at 231 km/h. The difference is around 19 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: VW Arteon pulls minimal stronger with 420 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Kodiaq
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, VW Arteon is minimal lighter – 1607 kg compared to 1684 kg. The difference is around 77 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers clearly perceptible more room – 910 L compared to 590 L. That’s a difference of about 320 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs evident better – up to 2105 L, which is about 473 L more than the VW Arteon.
When it comes to payload, VW Arteon barely noticeable takes the win – 569 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.
Who wins the race?
The Skoda Kodiaq proves to be leaves the rival little chance and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Skoda Kodiaq is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
from about £36,800
Skoda Kodiaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Arteon
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Skoda Kodiaq
5 (2 Reviews)
The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.
details
VW Arteon
5 (1 Reviews)
The VW Arteon cuts a fastback silhouette that manages to look more expensive than it is, with a cabin that feels calm, roomy and smartly finished. It blends relaxed long distance comfort with a touch of sporting poise, making it a clever choice for buyers who want grand touring polish without shouting for attention.
details
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Arteon
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
36800 - 49600 £
|
Price
43300 - 60800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 8.6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
35 - 186 g/km
|
co2
133 - 195 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 58 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
66 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
|
Curb weight
1607 - 1773 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
|
Trunk capacity
590 L
|
|
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
|
Length
4866 mm
|
|
Width
1864 mm
|
Width
1871 mm
|
|
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
|
Height
1434 - 1451 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
2105 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1632 L
|
|
Payload
460 - 563 kg
|
Payload
467 - 569 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
|
Power HP
150 - 320 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 9.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
|
Max Speed
216 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
|
Torque
320 - 420 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
|
Power kW
110 - 235 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1968 - 1984 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F, G
|
|
Brand
Skoda
|
Brand
VW
|
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?
The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.