Compare performance (368 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – smart #1 or MG ZS?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MG ZS is considerably cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the smart #1 costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,714 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the smart #1 offers considerably more power – delivering 368 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 171 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the smart #1 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 3.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the smart #1 delivers substantially more torque with 470 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 322 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is clearly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 570 kg.
When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries very slightly more – 470 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.
The smart #1 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Smart #1 feels like a breath of fresh air in the compact EV world, pairing playful styling with usable space and a cabin that punches above its size. It skips the fuss and delivers an easygoing, city-friendly driving experience with clever features that make it a sensible, slightly cheeky choice for everyday motoring.
detailsThe MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,700 £
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,900 kg
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
313 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,822 mm
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
368 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
470 Nm
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
271 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
smart
|
Brand
MG
|