VS

Suzuki S-Cross vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison

Compare performance (110 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki S-Cross or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

Suzuki S-Cross vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • visibly lighter
details

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

S-Cross

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Suzuki S-Cross is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,523 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses 3.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.6 L/100km.

Range Rover Evoque

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers significantly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 159 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers significantly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 305 Nm more.

S-Cross

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is visibly lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 512 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers only slightly more boot space – 472 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.

When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries visibly more – 600 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 195 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,300
Range Rover Evoque

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 160 - 269 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 67 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick …
Suzuki S-Cross
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.

details
RR_EVQ_20MY_Dynamic_ND_221118_02_big
067rrevq20mysilverdynamic045
Range Rover Evoque Plug-In Hybrid_MJ20jpg (15)
RR_EVQ_21MY_INTERIOR_260820_S44_03

Reviews Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Nissan Qashqai
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing a compact SUV is more about lifestyle than just luggage space, and in this matchup the Nissan Qashqai brings glossy tech, a classy cabin and composed road manners. The Suzuki S-Cross counters with sensible packaging, economical engines and value that won’t make your wallet faint — which …
Dacia Duster
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Dacia Duster and Suzuki S-Cross offer distinct advantages that cater to different types of drivers. The Duster impresses with its affordability and rugged design, perfect for those seeking an economical and versatile vehicle for both urban and off-road …
BMW X1
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
Unsure whether the BMW X1 or the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Skoda Karoq
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Skoda Karoq and Suzuki S‑Cross are compact crossover SUVs aimed at buyers who want a practical, comfortable daily driver with a raised seating position and SUV versatility. This comparison focuses on interior space, comfort, driving dynamics, equipment and running costs to help you decide which …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross is the scrappy, value-packed compact SUV — cheaper to buy, nimbler in town and surprisingly practical, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a little driving sparkle for Toyota’s famed refinement, stronger safety kit and an efficient hybrid powertrain. Pick the S‑Cross if you …
Suzuki S-Cross
Dacia Bigster
VS
Suzuki S-Cross and Dacia Bigster go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Opel Frontera
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Unsure whether the Opel Frontera or the Suzuki S-Cross is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Suzuki S-Cross
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
67 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
119 - 138 g/km
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
Trunk capacity
430 L
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,785 mm
Width
1,900 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
395 - 405 kg
Payload
503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
110 HP
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
235 Nm
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
81 kW
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
Land Rover
What drive types are available for the Suzuki S-Cross?

The Suzuki S-Cross is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.