VS

Suzuki S-Cross vs Mitsubishi Outlander - Differences and prices compared

Compare performance (110 HP vs 306 HP), boot space and price (21800 £ vs 42800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki S-Cross or Mitsubishi Outlander?

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate

Mitsubishi Outlander

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

You can find all user reviews further down on this page.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

S-Cross

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Suzuki S-Cross has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21800 £ , while the Mitsubishi Outlander costs 42800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21086 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi Outlander manages with 0.80 L and is therefore significantly more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.30 L. The difference is about 4.50 L per 100 km.

Outlander

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mitsubishi Outlander has a decisively edge – offering 306 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 196 HP more horsepower.

In terms of top speed, the Suzuki S-Cross performs minimal better – reaching 185 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Outlander tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 15 km/h.

S-Cross

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is convincingly lighter – 1280 kg compared to 2070 kg. The difference is around 790 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers to a small extent more room – 495 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 65 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mitsubishi Outlander performs to a small extent better – up to 1404 L, which is about 174 L more than the Suzuki S-Cross.

When it comes to payload, Mitsubishi Outlander evident takes the win – 595 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 190 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mitsubishi Outlander is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Suzuki S-Cross
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £42,800
Outlander

Mitsubishi Outlander

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 306 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.80 L
  • Electric Range : 83 - 85 km
details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate

The Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Mitsubishi Outlander

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.

details
VIC01568-HDR-Edit-Edit-2
25_Outlander_DSC05046
25_Outlander_DSC05200

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (3 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Reviews Mitsubishi Outlander

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross and Vitara live in the same family but play different roles: the S‑Cross is the sensible, spacious commuter while the Vitara is the cheeky all‑rounder with a touch more character. The S‑Cross wins on practicality — bigger boot, roomier rear seats and a cushier ride for long miles …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross is the scrappy, value-packed compact SUV — cheaper to buy, nimbler in town and surprisingly practical, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a little driving sparkle for Toyota’s famed refinement, stronger safety kit and an efficient hybrid powertrain. Pick the S‑Cross if you …
Suzuki S-Cross
Mitsubishi Outlander

Costs and Consumption
Price
21800 - 34200 £
Price
42800 - 51000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L
Consumption L/100km
0.80 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
119 - 138 g/km
co2
19 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
Fuel tank capacity
53 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1280 - 1385 kg
Curb weight
2070 - 2120 kg
Trunk capacity
430 L
Trunk capacity
495 L
Length
4305 mm
Length
4719 mm
Width
1785 mm
Width
1862 mm
Height
1580 mm
Height
1746 - 1750 mm
Max trunk capacity
1230 L
Max trunk capacity
1404 L
Payload
395 - 405 kg
Payload
545 - 595 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
-
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
-
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
110 HP
Power HP
306 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
Max Speed
180 - 185 km/h
Max Speed
170 km/h
Torque
235 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
81 kW
Power kW
225 kW
Engine capacity
1373 cm3
Engine capacity
2360 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
Mitsubishi

Similar Comparisons

Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross is the sensible family crossover: generous boot, honest equipment and wallet-friendly pricing that make it a practical pick if you prioritise space and value. The Toyota Yaris Cross is the clever city slicker — compact, refined, and available with efficient hybrid power and that …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Mazda CX-30 stands out with its premium interior and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to those who prioritize style and performance. In contrast, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach with its spacious cabin and impressive fuel …
Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Across
VS
In the world of compact SUVs, the Suzuki S-Cross and Suzuki Across offer distinct advantages tailored to different driving preferences. While the S-Cross shines with its agile handling and affordability, the Across impresses with its powerful hybrid technology and spacious interior, making it a …
Hyundai Tucson
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and Suzuki S-Cross compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Suzuki S-Cross
Dacia Bigster
VS
Unsure whether the Suzuki S-Cross or the Dacia Bigster is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Hyundai Kona
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Hyundai Kona impresses with its bold design, high-tech features, and engaging driving dynamics, making it a standout choice for those seeking a fun and stylish ride. Meanwhile, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more practical approach, boasting a spacious …
Opel Frontera
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Unsure whether the Opel Frontera or the Suzuki S-Cross is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Subaru Crosstrek
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive segment of compact crossovers, the Subaru Crosstrek impresses with its off-road prowess and standard all-wheel drive, making it ideal for those craving adventure. On the other hand, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more urban-friendly appeal, boasting a smooth ride, efficient fuel …
What drive types are available for the Suzuki S-Cross?

The Suzuki S-Cross is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.