VS

Suzuki S-Cross vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (110 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 49,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki S-Cross or Volvo XC60?

Suzuki S-Cross vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • clearly lighter

Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • a bit more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

S-Cross

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Suzuki S-Cross is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,429 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 2.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers considerably more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 345 HP more horsepower.

Looking at top speed, the Suzuki S-Cross is marginally faster – reaching 185 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers considerably more torque with 709 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 474 Nm more.

S-Cross

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is clearly lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 620 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers a bit more boot space – 483 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 53 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 offers noticeably more capacity – up to 1,543 L, about 313 L more than the Suzuki S-Cross.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries noticeably more – 550 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 145 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,200
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Suzuki’s compact crossover siblings square off: S-Cross vs Vitara. One leans practical and polished, the other flirts with adventure—let’s find out which Suzuki deserves your driveway and your fuel money.
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …
Suzuki S-Cross
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Meet the Volvo XC60 and the new Volvo EX60 — two mid‑size premium SUVs that look like cousins but drive like rivals, one rooted in combustion tradition and the other staking Volvo’s claim in the electric future. Which should you buy: the familiar, comfort-first XC60 that does everything reliably …
Nissan Qashqai
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing a compact SUV is more about lifestyle than just luggage space, and in this matchup the Nissan Qashqai brings glossy tech, a classy cabin and composed road manners. The Suzuki S-Cross counters with sensible packaging, economical engines and value that won’t make your wallet faint — which …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross is the scrappy, value-packed compact SUV — cheaper to buy, nimbler in town and surprisingly practical, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a little driving sparkle for Toyota’s famed refinement, stronger safety kit and an efficient hybrid powertrain. Pick the S‑Cross if you …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross is the sensible family crossover: generous boot, honest equipment and wallet-friendly pricing that make it a practical pick if you prioritise space and value. The Toyota Yaris Cross is the clever city slicker — compact, refined, and available with efficient hybrid power and that …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Suzuki S-Cross
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
119 - 138 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
430 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
4,305 mm
Length
4,708 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
1,580 mm
Height
1,655 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,230 L
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
Payload
395 - 405 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
110 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
180 - 185 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
235 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
81 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
Volvo
What drive types are available for the Suzuki S-Cross?

The Suzuki S-Cross is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.