VS

Suzuki S-Cross vs VW T-Cross comparison

Compare performance (110 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (21,800 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki S-Cross or VW T-Cross?

Suzuki S-Cross vs VW T-Cross: Key differences

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • barely more efficient

VW T-Cross

4.3 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • marginally lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

S-Cross

Comparing Two Compact SUVs: The Suzuki S-Cross vs. VW T-Cross

The compact SUV segment has been gaining immense popularity among urban drivers, and two contenders have caught the attention of car enthusiasts and buyers alike: the Suzuki S-Cross and the Volkswagen T-Cross. Both vehicles bring unique styling, advanced technology, and efficient powertrains to the table. In this article, we'll dive into the technical aspects, innovations, and features of these two impressive SUVs to help you decide which one is the better fit for your lifestyle.

T-Cross

Powertrains and Performance

The Suzuki S-Cross offers a choice of a full hybrid and petrol mild-hybrid engine options, producing a range of power outputs from 116 to 129 HP. The S-Cross is equipped with both an automatic and manual transmission option, including an automated manual gearbox for heightened driving dynamics. With a torque of 235 Nm, this SUV can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in just 9.5 seconds, making it efficient for both city and highway driving. The S-Cross also boasts a top speed of up to 195 km/h.

In contrast, the VW T-Cross features exclusively petrol engines with power outputs ranging from 95 to 150 HP. It offers more engine capacity choices, with the smaller engine being a 999 cm3 three-cylinder unit to a more powerful 1498 cm3 four-cylinder unit. The T-Cross primarily employs a manual gearbox but also offers a dual-clutch automatic for those who prefer a more seamless driving experience. The T-Cross exhibits impressive performance as well, achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.4 seconds and a top speed reaching 200 km/h.

S-Cross

Fuel Efficiency

Fuel efficiency is a vital consideration when choosing an SUV, especially for urban commuting. The Suzuki S-Cross showcases commendable consumption figures ranging from 5.1 to 5.8 L/100 km, depending on the chosen variant, allowing drivers to enjoy longer trips without frequent refueling.

On the other hand, the VW T-Cross also holds its ground with fuel consumption figures between 5.6 to 6.0 L/100 km, which still makes it a relatively efficient option in this segment. Both SUVs fall within the CO2 efficiency class D, indicating environmental awareness and lower emissions.

T-Cross

Dimensions and Interior Space

In terms of physical dimensions, the Suzuki S-Cross measures 4300 mm in length, 1785 mm in width, and stands 1580 mm tall. It provides ample trunk capacity of 430 liters, along with sufficient legroom for five occupants. This makes the S-Cross a spacious option, ideal for family outings and weekend getaways.

The VW T-Cross, while slightly shorter at 4127 mm, manages to offer a generous trunk space of 455 liters, slightly outpacing its rival in this area. Its dimensions of 1784 mm in width and a height of 1573 mm maintain practical interior space for five passengers, ensuring comfort during longer journeys.

S-Cross

Technological Innovations and Safety Features

Both models are equipped with a range of modern technological features designed to enhance driver experience and safety. The Suzuki S-Cross comes standard with a large touchscreen infotainment system, smartphone connectivity, and various advanced driver assistance systems, including adaptive cruise control and lane departure warning. These tech features enhance the overall driving experience and offer peace of mind on the road.

In comparison, the VW T-Cross also integrates a sophisticated infotainment system, providing seamless connectivity and digital services. Safety remains a priority, with features such as a comprehensive suite of safety systems, including automatic emergency braking and blind-spot monitoring, ensuring occupants' well-being.

T-Cross

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Ultimately, both the Suzuki S-Cross and VW T-Cross present compelling choices in the compact SUV market. The S-Cross stands out with its hybrid options, efficient fuel consumption, and spacious interior, while the T-Cross shines with its performance, advanced tech features, and slightly larger trunk space. Buyers will need to weigh their requirements and preferences when deciding which model best suits their needs.

In this battle of compact SUVs, whether you prioritize efficiency and spaciousness or performance and technology, both the Suzuki S-Cross and VW T-Cross are worth considering. Choose wisely, and happy driving!

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Suzuki’s compact crossover siblings square off: S-Cross vs Vitara. One leans practical and polished, the other flirts with adventure—let’s find out which Suzuki deserves your driveway and your fuel money.
SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
The SEAT Arona and VW T‑Cross duke it out in the small SUV ring: the Arona brings punchy styling and a driver-focused feel, while the T‑Cross leans on roomy practicality and Volkswagen calm. Pick the Arona for a bit more sparkle and sporty character, or the T‑Cross if cargo space, refinement and …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

S-Cross

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW T-Cross is marginally cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Suzuki S-Cross costs 21,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 368 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki S-Cross uses 5.3 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.

T-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the VW T-Cross offers markedly more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 40 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW T-Cross delivers very slightly more torque with 250 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 15 Nm more.

S-Cross

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Cross is marginally lighter – 1,267 kg compared to 1,280 kg. The difference is around 13 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW T-Cross offers only slightly more boot space – 455 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 25 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Cross carries somewhat more – 480 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 75 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The VW T-Cross stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,400
T-Cross

VW T-Cross

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 95 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 6 L/100km
details
Suzuki S-Cross
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

VW T-Cross

The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews VW T-Cross

4.3 (3 Reviews)
rate
Monika
12 Feb 2026, 07:34:19

I chose the T‑Cross — more comfortable and roomier inside, especially for adult passengers; bought on the model‑year clearance — running costs work out cheaper even taking into account fuel savings from the Toyota hybrid (planned over five years); I like the space and the VW suited me better — I prefer the view through the front windshield.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Erasmo Paone
21 Oct 2025, 21:49:59

Very practical, interior space is excellent. Lacks charm, fuel consumption is a bit high.

Frequently compared as well

VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Nissan Qashqai
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing a compact SUV is more about lifestyle than just luggage space, and in this matchup the Nissan Qashqai brings glossy tech, a classy cabin and composed road manners. The Suzuki S-Cross counters with sensible packaging, economical engines and value that won’t make your wallet faint — which …
VW T-Cross
VW Taigo
VS
Meet the VW T‑Cross and VW Taigo: two compact crossovers from Volkswagen chasing the same urban buyers but with very different personalities — the practical, upright T‑Cross versus the swoopy, style-first Taigo. Read on to see which one earns a place in your driveway, whether you prize family …
Renault Captur
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact crossover showdown, the Renault Captur dazzles with bold styling, quirky customization and clever interior tricks, while the VW T-Cross takes a quieter route—solid build, practical space and no-nonsense usability. Choose the Captur if you want personality and fun; pick the T‑Cross if …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross is the sensible family crossover: generous boot, honest equipment and wallet-friendly pricing that make it a practical pick if you prioritise space and value. The Toyota Yaris Cross is the clever city slicker — compact, refined, and available with efficient hybrid power and that …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross is the scrappy, value-packed compact SUV — cheaper to buy, nimbler in town and surprisingly practical, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a little driving sparkle for Toyota’s famed refinement, stronger safety kit and an efficient hybrid powertrain. Pick the S‑Cross if you …
Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
The Ford Puma and VW T‑Cross go head-to-head in the compact crossover class — one flirty and fun, the other sensible and steady — both promising SUV looks without the bulk. We’ll pit the Puma’s lively handling and clever storage tricks against the T‑Cross’s comfort-first setup and family-friendly …
Suzuki S-Cross
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
119 - 138 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
Trunk capacity
430 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
4,305 mm
Length
-
Width
1,785 mm
Width
1,784 mm
Height
1,580 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,230 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
395 - 405 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
110 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
180 - 185 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
235 Nm
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
81 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the Suzuki S-Cross?

The Suzuki S-Cross is offered with Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.