VS

Suzuki Vitara vs Ferrari 296 Coupe comparison

Compare performance (184 HP vs 880 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 348,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Vitara or Ferrari 296 Coupe?

Suzuki Vitara vs Ferrari 296 Coupe: Key differences

Suzuki Vitara

4.5 (12 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • significantly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • visibly lighter
details

Ferrari 296 Coupe

  • clearly more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Vitara

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Suzuki Vitara is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Ferrari 296 Coupe costs 348,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 325,286 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Vitara uses 5.3 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Ferrari 296 Coupe with 8.9 L/100km. The difference is about 3.6 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Suzuki Vitara offers clearly more range – reaching up to 426 km, about 411 km more than the Ferrari 296 Coupe.

296 Coupe

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ferrari 296 Coupe offers clearly more power – delivering 880 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 696 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ferrari 296 Coupe is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 2.8 s, while the Suzuki Vitara takes 7.4 s. That’s about 4.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ferrari 296 Coupe delivers clearly more torque with 755 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 448 Nm more.

Vitara

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Suzuki Vitara offers more seats – 5 vs 2.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is visibly lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,670 kg. The difference is around 415 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Suzuki Vitara carries considerably more – 425 kg compared to 225 kg. That’s a difference of about 200 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Suzuki Vitara is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,600
Vitara

Suzuki Vitara

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Automatic, Manual
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 110 - 184 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 344 - 426 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Suzuki Vitara
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki Vitara and the Toyota Yaris Cross both aim at buyers wanting compact SUVs, but they take different approaches: the Vitara leans toward rugged simplicity and practical space, while the Yaris Cross focuses on urban refinement and hybrid efficiency. I’ll compare their practicality, driving …
Suzuki Vitara
Ferrari 296 Coupe

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Suzuki Vitara

The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.

details
Suzuki_Vitara_002
Suzuki_Vitara_020
Suzuki_Vitara_039
Suzuki_Vitara_023
Suzuki_Vitara_004
Vitara_9

Reviews Suzuki Vitara

4.5 (12 Reviews)
rate
Overall, owners tend to see the Suzuki Vitara as a practical, good‑value compact SUV that feels roomy and pleasant to drive, with solid performance and dependable long‑distance capability. Typical positives cited are strong value for money, good visibility, practicality for daily or leisure use and a lively engine; typical negatives that some owners mention are basic interior finishes (especially upper door plastics), noticeable door/window noise and a less modern styling. These comments largely focus on subjective finish and acoustic insulation rather than mechanical faults, so impressions are generally positive though not unanimous.
Patricius
30 Aug 2026, 19:25:54

I've driven 63,000 km in an automatic 2018 Suzuki Vitara 1.4 turbo S 4x4, 140 hp and 220 Nm of torque. Possibly the best engine for this car. Average consumption 5.8 L/100 km. Practical luggage space. Not the quietest, but solid build quality. Has air conditioning and adaptive cruise control. Physical buttons, no digital instrument cluster. There is a small screen with radio, music player, GPS and Android connectivity.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Franceschi Giancarlo
29 Jul 2026, 15:59:14

Very positive impression, a car I would really buy again.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Kattia
17 Jun 2026, 20:01:52

The new Vitara is beautiful, almost like the RAV4.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
yannick h
13 Jun 2026, 15:09:09

The Vitara is powerful, light and practical, with a 4-cylinder engine; flaws: plastic upper door trim and a less modern appearance.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Bud
5 Jun 2026, 11:14:19

De Vitara voelt aan alle kanten royaler aan dan de TYC. Geeft duidelijk meer zicht rondom de auto. De TYC is zeker in de bebouwde kom superzuinig. Het rijden met de Vitara geeft het gevoel in een grotere auto te rijden dan de TYC.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Ferrari 296 Coupe

Slip behind the wheel of the Ferrari 296 GTB and you get a compact supercar that turns everyday roads into a racetrack with intoxicating urgency and razor-sharp poise. It's the perfect choice for drivers who want headline-grabbing performance and Ferrari drama without the showroom theatrics, all wrapped in stunning Italian design.

details
0c4a02aa-7ef0-4741-9475-1e235af2781d

Reviews Ferrari 296 Coupe

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki Swift
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Choosing between the Suzuki Swift and the Suzuki Vitara comes down to whether you want a nimble city hatchback or a roomier compact SUV. The Swift excels with light steering, efficient running costs and easy parking, while the Vitara offers higher seating, more cargo space and light off-road …
Opel Frontera
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Opel Frontera and Suzuki Vitara are both compact SUVs that appeal to buyers who want a capable, practical vehicle, but they take different approaches — the Frontera leans toward a sturdier, more spacious package while the Vitara focuses on light off-road ability, efficiency and city-friendly …
Jeep Avenger
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Jeep Avenger and the Suzuki Vitara are two compact SUVs that take different routes to the same goal: city-friendly size with some crossover capability — the Avenger emphasizes modern design and electrified options, while the Vitara leans on proven practicality and value. This short comparison …
Kia Sportage
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact SUVs, the Kia Sportage and Suzuki Vitara each offer distinct advantages that appeal to different types of drivers. The Sportage impresses with its stylish design, advanced technology features, and spacious interior, making it a strong contender for families …
Suzuki Vitara
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Suzuki Vitara and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique blend of style and functionality. The Vitara impresses with its rugged design and off-road capabilities, making it a sturdy companion for adventurous drivers. In contrast, the T-Roc offers a more …
Dacia Duster
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Dacia Duster is known for no-nonsense value and roomy practicality, while the Suzuki Vitara offers a more polished drive and a stronger equipment list. This comparison will highlight where each SUV shines — from running costs and interior space to technology and on-road manners — so you can …
Honda HR-V
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Honda HR‑V and Suzuki Vitara are two popular compact SUVs with distinct personalities — the HR‑V emphasizes interior refinement and clever packaging, while the Vitara leans more toward value and straightforward, capable practicality. This comparison cuts through the marketing to highlight …
Opel Mokka
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Opel Mokka and Suzuki Vitara compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Suzuki Vitara
Ferrari 296 Coupe

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
Price
348,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
8.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
Electric Range
15 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 137 g/km
co2
218 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Coupe
Seats
5
Seats
2
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
Curb weight
1,670 kg
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
Width
1,958 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
395 - 425 kg
Payload
225 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Plug-in Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manual
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
Power HP
880 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
2.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
Torque
755 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
6
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
Power kW
648 kW
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
Engine capacity
2,992 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
Ferrari
Is the Suzuki Vitara offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.