Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Suzuki Vitara vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison
Compare performance (184 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Vitara or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?
Suzuki Vitara vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Vitara
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Suzuki Vitara is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,714 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses 3.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 1.6 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Suzuki Vitara offers significantly more range – reaching up to 426 km, about 359 km more than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque.
Range Rover Evoque
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers visibly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 85 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is only slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the Suzuki Vitara takes 7.4 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers substantially more torque with 540 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 233 Nm more.
Vitara
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is considerably lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 537 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers visibly more boot space – 472 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 97 L.
When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries visibly more – 600 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 175 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Suzuki Vitara stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,600
Suzuki Vitara
Suzuki Vitara
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Suzuki Vitara
The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.
details
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.
details
Suzuki Vitara
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
Electric Range
60 - 67 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 137 g/km
|
co2
85 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
Trunk capacity
472 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
Width
1,900 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Payload
503 - 600 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
Land Rover
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.