VS

Suzuki Vitara vs Mazda CX-60 comparison

Compare performance (184 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 43,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Vitara or Mazda CX-60?

Suzuki Vitara vs Mazda CX-60: Key differences

Suzuki Vitara

4.5 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • considerably lighter

Mazda CX-60

4.6 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Vitara

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Suzuki Vitara is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Mazda CX-60 costs 43,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,100 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-60 uses 3.8 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Suzuki Vitara offers considerably more range – reaching up to 426 km, about 363 km more than the Mazda CX-60.

CX-60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-60 offers significantly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 143 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-60 is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.8 s, while the Suzuki Vitara takes 7.4 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-60 delivers significantly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 243 Nm more.

Vitara

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is considerably lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,890 kg. The difference is around 635 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-60 offers clearly more boot space – 570 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 195 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-60 carries markedly more – 612 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 187 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-60 comes out modestly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,700
CX-60

Mazda CX-60

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 200 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 63 km
Suzuki Vitara
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Suzuki Vitara

The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.

details

Mazda CX-60

The Mazda CX-60 pairs sculpted, understated looks with poised handling and a cabin that punches above its class, making long drives feel unexpectedly civilized. For buyers who want a premium feel without the showroom swagger, it's the sort of car that earns respect quietly — and still manages a wink when you push on.

details
Suzuki Vitara
Mazda CX-60

Costs and Consumption

Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
Price
43,700 - 57,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.8 - 5.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
Electric Range
63 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 138 g/km
co2
85 - 137 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
Curb weight
1,890 - 2,055 kg
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
Trunk capacity
570 L
Length
4,185 mm
Length
-
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Height
1,595 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,046 - 1,120 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 - 425 kg
Payload
581 - 612 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid, Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
Power HP
200 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 12.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
Torque
450 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
Power kW
147 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
1,373 - 1,462 cm3
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, D, E
Brand
Suzuki
Brand
Mazda
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.