Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Suzuki Vitara vs Volvo V60 comparison
Compare performance (184 HP vs 350 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 51,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Vitara or Volvo V60?
Suzuki Vitara vs Volvo V60: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Vitara
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Suzuki Vitara is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Volvo V60 costs 51,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,849 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo V60 uses 2 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Suzuki Vitara with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 3.3 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Suzuki Vitara offers clearly more range – reaching up to 426 km, about 327 km more than the Volvo V60.
V60
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo V60 offers clearly more power – delivering 350 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 166 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo V60 is noticeably quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Suzuki Vitara takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo V60 delivers significantly more torque with 589 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 282 Nm more.
Vitara
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is markedly lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,734 kg. The difference is around 479 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Volvo V60 offers markedly more boot space – 519 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 144 L.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo V60 carries moderately more – 506 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 81 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo V60 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £51,400
Volvo V60
Suzuki Vitara
Volvo V60
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Suzuki Vitara
The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.
details
Volvo V60
The Volvo V60 blends elegant Scandinavian design with a practical estate layout, making it a composed and sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. Inside, a serene cabin, clever safety features and a supple ride turn daily commutes and weekend getaways into effortless, grown-up motoring.
details
Suzuki Vitara
Volvo V60
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
Price
51,400 - 62,500 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
2 - 6.2 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
Electric Range
99 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 137 g/km
|
co2
45 - 141 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Estate
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
Curb weight
1,734 - 2,070 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
Trunk capacity
519 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
Width
1,850 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Payload
460 - 506 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
Power HP
197 - 350 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 7.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 589 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
Power kW
145 - 247 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.