Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Vitara or Volvo XC40?
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Suzuki Vitara and Volvo XC40 stand out for their unique offerings and innovations. As 2024 models, both vehicles bring fresh features and advancements to the table, tailored to meet the diverse needs of modern drivers. Whether it's performance, efficiency, or style, these SUVs are designed to impress.
When it comes to performance, the Suzuki Vitara and Volvo XC40 cater to different expectations. The Vitara offers a choice between two petrol mild hybrid engines, with outputs of 129 HP and 116 HP. Its acceleration ranges from 9.5 to 12.7 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h, and it can reach top speeds between 180 km/h and 190 km/h. Additionally, the Vitara comes with both manual and automated manual transmissions, along with options for front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC40 is equipped with more powerful petrol mild hybrid engines delivering 163 HP and 197 HP. The XC40 has faster acceleration, clocking in at 7.6 to 8.6 seconds to go from 0 to 100 km/h, hitting a maximum speed of 180 km/h. It features a smooth dual-clutch automatic transmission, enhancing its driving comfort.
Fuel consumption is a critical factor for most SUV enthusiasts. The Suzuki Vitara offers impressive efficiency, with figures ranging from 5.3 to 5.6 L/100km, contributing to lower CO2 emissions (119-128 g/km) and better environmental scores—ranging from Class C to D in CO2 efficiency.
While the Volvo XC40 also emphasizes efficiency, it stands at 6.5 L/100km with CO2 emissions at 147-148 g/km, earning it a CO2 efficiency class of E. It is worth noting that the Volvo's larger engine capacity of 1969 cm3, opposed to Vitara's 1373-1462 cm3, generally accounts for its increased emissions.
Both SUVs provide comfortable seating for five passengers, but they differ in cargo capacity and dimensions. The Vitara holds a trunk capacity of 375 to 289 liters and measures 4185 mm in length, 1775 mm in width, and 1595 mm in height. It is designed to be compact, making it ideal for urban settings.
Conversely, the Volvo XC40 offers a larger trunk capacity of 452 liters. It presents a more substantial presence with dimensions of 4425 mm in length, 1863 mm in width, and 1652 mm in height, providing more storage space and an enhanced road presence.
Innovation is present in both vehicles, catering to the tech-savvy drivers of today. The XC40 includes advanced safety and driving assistance systems, along with luxurious interior technology, aligning with Volvo's reputation for premium car manufacturing. The Vitara complements this with robust connectivity features, ensuring a user-friendly experience for its passengers.
The decision between the Suzuki Vitara and the Volvo XC40 depends on personal preferences and priorities. The Vitara shines with remarkable fuel efficiency and compact urban versatility, while the XC40 offers a power-packed performance and luxury appeal. As the automotive landscape evolves, these SUVs lead as compelling options for various lifestyle needs.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Suzuki Vitara has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 23600 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 13191 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Suzuki Vitara manages with 5 L and is therefore noticeable more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 1.50 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 has a evident edge – offering 197 HP compared to 129 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 7.60 s, while the Suzuki Vitara takes 9.50 s. That’s about 1.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Suzuki Vitara performs minimal better – reaching 190 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo XC40 pulls noticeable stronger with 300 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 65 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is clearly perceptible lighter – 1255 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 433 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers slightly more room – 452 L compared to 375 L. That’s a difference of about 77 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC40 performs to a small extent better – up to 1328 L, which is about 208 L more than the Suzuki Vitara.
When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 distinct takes the win – 532 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 132 kg.
The Volvo XC40 proves to be wins solidly and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Volvo XC40 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ Volvo Cars
The Vitara is a city-smart SUV with a cheeky streak of off-road promise, perfect for drivers who want practicality without pretense. It’s honest, easy to live with and surprisingly likeable, a sensible companion for everyday adventures and weekend escapes.
details
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.
details
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
|
@ Suzuki Motor Corporation
|
@ Volvo Cars
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23600 - 30900 £
|
Price
36800 - 47200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
113 - 138 g/km
|
co2
147 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
47 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1255 - 1395 kg
|
Curb weight
1688 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
289 - 375 L
|
Trunk capacity
452 L
|
|
Length
4185 mm
|
Length
4425 mm
|
|
Width
1775 mm
|
Width
1863 mm
|
|
Height
1595 mm
|
Height
1652 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1046 - 1120 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
|
|
Payload
375 - 400 kg
|
Payload
532 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automated Manual, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 129 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.5 - 12.7 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 - 190 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
235 Nm
|
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
81 - 95 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1373 - 1462 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España