Compare performance (184 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (23,600 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Suzuki Vitara or Volvo XC40?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Suzuki Vitara and Volvo XC40 stand out for their unique offerings and innovations. As 2024 models, both vehicles bring fresh features and advancements to the table, tailored to meet the diverse needs of modern drivers. Whether it's performance, efficiency, or style, these SUVs are designed to impress.
When it comes to performance, the Suzuki Vitara and Volvo XC40 cater to different expectations. The Vitara offers a choice between two petrol mild hybrid engines, with outputs of 129 HP and 116 HP. Its acceleration ranges from 9.5 to 12.7 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h, and it can reach top speeds between 180 km/h and 190 km/h. Additionally, the Vitara comes with both manual and automated manual transmissions, along with options for front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC40 is equipped with more powerful petrol mild hybrid engines delivering 163 HP and 197 HP. The XC40 has faster acceleration, clocking in at 7.6 to 8.6 seconds to go from 0 to 100 km/h, hitting a maximum speed of 180 km/h. It features a smooth dual-clutch automatic transmission, enhancing its driving comfort.
Fuel consumption is a critical factor for most SUV enthusiasts. The Suzuki Vitara offers impressive efficiency, with figures ranging from 5.3 to 5.6 L/100km, contributing to lower CO2 emissions (119-128 g/km) and better environmental scores—ranging from Class C to D in CO2 efficiency.
While the Volvo XC40 also emphasizes efficiency, it stands at 6.5 L/100km with CO2 emissions at 147-148 g/km, earning it a CO2 efficiency class of E. It is worth noting that the Volvo's larger engine capacity of 1969 cm3, opposed to Vitara's 1373-1462 cm3, generally accounts for its increased emissions.
Both SUVs provide comfortable seating for five passengers, but they differ in cargo capacity and dimensions. The Vitara holds a trunk capacity of 375 to 289 liters and measures 4185 mm in length, 1775 mm in width, and 1595 mm in height. It is designed to be compact, making it ideal for urban settings.
Conversely, the Volvo XC40 offers a larger trunk capacity of 452 liters. It presents a more substantial presence with dimensions of 4425 mm in length, 1863 mm in width, and 1652 mm in height, providing more storage space and an enhanced road presence.
Innovation is present in both vehicles, catering to the tech-savvy drivers of today. The XC40 includes advanced safety and driving assistance systems, along with luxurious interior technology, aligning with Volvo's reputation for premium car manufacturing. The Vitara complements this with robust connectivity features, ensuring a user-friendly experience for its passengers.
The decision between the Suzuki Vitara and the Volvo XC40 depends on personal preferences and priorities. The Vitara shines with remarkable fuel efficiency and compact urban versatility, while the XC40 offers a power-packed performance and luxury appeal. As the automotive landscape evolves, these SUVs lead as compelling options for various lifestyle needs.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Suzuki Vitara is considerably cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,334 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Vitara uses 5.3 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.5 L/100km. The difference is about 1.2 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC40 offers very slightly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 13 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Suzuki Vitara is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Suzuki Vitara delivers barely more torque with 307 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 7 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is markedly lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,688 kg. The difference is around 433 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC40 carries markedly more – 532 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 107 kg.
The Suzuki Vitara stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.
details
The Volvo XC40 blends Scandinavian design with practical versatility, offering a compact luxury crossover that feels composed and easy to live with. It’s refined and focused on safety with a high-quality interior, making it a smart choice for daily city driving and weekend escapes.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
Price
41,900 - 46,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 137 g/km
|
co2
148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
Curb weight
1,688 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
Width
1,863 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Payload
532 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España