Compare performance (223 HP vs 122 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 22,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota C-HR or Honda Jazz?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the world of compact cars, finding a vehicle that fits your lifestyle and driving preferences can be a thrilling yet daunting task. Two contenders that often appear on the shortlist of many potential buyers are the Honda Jazz and the Toyota C-HR. This head-to-head comparison will delve into their technical aspects and innovations to help you make an informed choice.
The Honda Jazz is a hatchback renowned for its practicality and space efficiency. With a length ranging from 4089mm to 4105mm and a height between 1526mm and 1556mm, it offers compact dimensions suitable for urban environments. Its trunk capacity of 304 liters may seem modest but is complemented by the versatile Magic Seats system, allowing users to maximize storage space.
In contrast, the Toyota C-HR embraces an SUV body style, reflecting a bolder and more aggressive stance on the road. It measures 4362mm in length, 1832mm in width, and a height of 1558mm to 1564mm. With a trunk capacity ranging from 350 to 447 liters, it edges out the Jazz in terms of cargo space, catering well to those needing extra storage for adventures and shopping sprees alike.
The Honda Jazz is powered by a full hybrid engine with 122 HP, providing a blend of performance and efficiency. It's equipped with a continuously variable transmission (CVT) and is a front-wheel drive, achieving a top speed of 175 km/h and reaching 0-100 km/h in around 9.4 to 9.7 seconds. Its fuel consumption is impressively low, ranging from 4.5 to 4.8 L/100km, making it an economical choice for the conscious driver.
The Toyota C-HR offers more variety in its powertrain with both full hybrid and plug-in hybrid options. Its horsepower ranges from 140 to 223 HP, depending on the model, and it can accelerate from 0-100 km/h in 7.4 to 9.9 seconds. With the plug-in hybrid variant, it offers an electric range of up to 68 kilometers, significantly lowering fuel consumption to as low as 0.8 L/100km. The option for an all-wheel-drive enhances its appeal for those needing extra traction.
The Honda Jazz showcases its innovative spirit with the Magic Seats feature, allowing for multiple seating configurations to maximize interior space utility. Its hybrid system ensures smooth and efficient driving, paired with modern infotainment options that keep drivers connected on the move.
Toyota's C-HR stands out with its futuristic design and hybrid synergy drive technology, renowned for its reliability and efficiency. The C-HR’s infotainment system integrates seamlessly into the driving experience, featuring a user-friendly interface. The plug-in hybrid variant also provides an eco-friendly option for urban commuting, emphasizing Toyota's commitment to sustainable driving solutions.
Choosing between the Honda Jazz and Toyota C-HR hinges on your individual priorities. The Jazz excels in offering a compact, efficient option for city driving with clever use of space. On the other hand, the C-HR combines a bolder design, a versatile powertrain array, and technological advancements, appealing to those seeking style with substance. Both vehicles bring commendable strengths to the table, ensuring that either choice will enrich your driving experience.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Honda Jazz is noticeably cheaper – starting at 22,200 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,934 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Honda Jazz with 4.5 L/100km. The difference is about 2.2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR offers clearly more power – delivering 223 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 101 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Honda Jazz takes 9.4 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Honda Jazz is a bit lighter – 1,302 kg compared to 1,505 kg. The difference is around 203 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Toyota C-HR offers noticeably more boot space – 447 L compared to 304 L. That’s a difference of about 143 L.
When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR carries barely more – 425 kg compared to 388 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.
The Toyota C-HR holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.
details
The Honda Jazz is a supremely practical small hatch that hides clever packaging and more usable space than it lets on, with friendly styling and an unfussy charm. It’s economical to run, easy to park and perfect for buyers who want reliable, versatile daily motoring without the hassle.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
|
Price
22,200 - 25,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 4.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
66 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
52 - 116 g/km
|
co2
102 - 108 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
|
Curb weight
1,302 - 1,321 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
Trunk capacity
304 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,832 mm
|
Width
1,694 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Payload
369 - 388 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.4 - 9.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
253 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
|
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Brand
Honda
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España