Compare performance (223 HP vs 414 HP), boot space and price (29,100 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota C-HR or KGM Musso EV?
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Toyota C-HR is noticeably cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the KGM Musso EV costs 36,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,857 £.
As for electric range, the KGM Musso EV offers considerably more range – reaching up to 420 km, about 354 km more than the Toyota C-HR.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the KGM Musso EV offers significantly more power – delivering 414 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 191 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the KGM Musso EV takes 8 s. That’s about 0.6 s quicker.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR is significantly lighter – 1,505 kg compared to 2,165 kg. The difference is around 660 kg.
When it comes to payload, the KGM Musso EV carries significantly more – 905 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 480 kg.
The KGM Musso EV is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.
detailsThe Musso EV blends pickup practicality with an electric drivetrain, delivering quiet performance and a roomy, well-equipped cabin that suits both work and everyday use. Its robust design and straightforward controls make it a compelling choice for buyers who want a capable utility vehicle with cleaner operation.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
|
Price
36,000 - 45,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
23 - 26 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
66 km
|
Electric Range
379 - 420 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
52 - 116 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Pickup
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
|
Curb weight
2,165 - 2,285 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,832 mm
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Payload
805 - 905 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plug-in Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
Power HP
207 - 414 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
339 - 678 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
Power kW
152 - 304 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Brand
KGM
|