Compare performance (223 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (29100 £ vs 21400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota C-HR or VW T-Cross?
The world of compact SUVs is fiercely competitive, and two models stand out in this segment: the Toyota C-HR and the VW T-Cross. Both vehicles cater to those looking for a balance of style, efficiency, and functionality. Let's break down these two popular models and see how they stack up against each other.
The Toyota C-HR exudes a futuristic and edgy design with its angular lines and coupé-like silhouette. It measures 4,362 mm in length, 1,832 mm in width, and up to 1,564 mm in height, offering a robust presence on the road. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross presents a more traditional SUV appearance with compact dimensions, measuring 4,127 mm in length, 1,784 mm in width, and 1,573 mm in height.
Beneath the hood, the C-HR presents a versatile powertrain lineup with its Full Hybrid and Plugin Hybrid options. It boasts power outputs ranging from 140 to 223 horsepower, allowing for varied performance options, with acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h completed in as little as 7.4 seconds. In contrast, the T-Cross keeps things simpler with its petrol engines, offering power outputs between 95 and 150 horsepower and a maximum speed of up to 200 km/h. The T-Cross reaches 100 km/h from a standstill in around 8.4 to 11.2 seconds, depending on the powertrain.
The C-HR utilizes a Continuously Variable Transmission (CVT) in its automatic setup and offers both front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations, catering to different driving preferences. The T-Cross provides both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions but only with a front-wheel-drive setup.
Fuel efficiency is where the C-HR shines, with consumption as low as 0.8 L/100 km for its plugin hybrid variant and CO2 emissions starting from just 19 g/km. The T-Cross, being purely petrol-driven, consumes between 5.6 and 6 L/100 km, resulting in CO2 emissions from 127 g/km upward.
Both vehicles seat five and provide ample space for passengers and cargo. The trunk capacity of the C-HR varies between 350 and 447 liters, whereas the T-Cross offers a consistent 455 liters, providing an edge in cargo-carrying capability. The C-HR offers a modern interior with a focus on technology and comfort, whereas the T-Cross delivers straightforward functionality combined with quality materials.
Toyota's focus on hybrid technology is evident in the C-HR, which allows for electric-only driving for up to 68 km, depending on the version. Advanced driver-assistance systems are a standard in both models, enhancing safety and convenience for the driver.
Choosing between the Toyota C-HR and the VW T-Cross ultimately depends on the consumer's priorities. For those prioritizing cutting-edge hybrid technology and eco-friendliness, the C-HR presents a compelling choice. On the other hand, those who prefer a straightforward, petrol-powered SUV with a focus on practicality and classic design would find the T-Cross appealing. Both models serve as excellent contenders in the compact SUV segment, each with its unique strengths.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
VW T-Cross has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21400 £ , while the Toyota C-HR costs 29100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7740 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota C-HR manages with 2.30 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the VW T-Cross with 5.40 L. The difference is about 3.10 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 223 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 73 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the VW T-Cross takes 8.40 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, VW T-Cross is a bit lighter – 1267 kg compared to 1505 kg. The difference is around 238 kg.
In terms of boot space, the VW T-Cross offers hardly perceptible more room – 455 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 8 L.
When it comes to payload, VW T-Cross slightly takes the win – 480 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.
The Toyota C-HR holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.
details
The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29100 - 42800 £
|
Price
21400 - 32000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
66 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
52 - 116 g/km
|
co2
124 - 136 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1505 - 1755 kg
|
Curb weight
1267 - 1338 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
|
Trunk capacity
455 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1832 mm
|
Width
1784 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
375 - 425 kg
|
Payload
463 - 480 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1798 - 1987 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
|
Brand
Toyota
|
Brand
VW
|
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España