VS

Toyota Proace City Compact Van vs Ford Ranger comparison

Compare performance (136 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (22,400 £ vs 48,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Toyota Proace City Compact Van or Ford Ranger?

Toyota Proace City Compact Van vs Ford Ranger: Key differences

Toyota Proace City Compact Van

  • considerably cheaper
  • clearly more electric range
  • significantly lighter
details

Ford Ranger

  • significantly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Proace City Compact Van

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Toyota Proace City Compact Van is considerably cheaper – starting at 22,400 £ , while the Ford Ranger costs 48,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,086 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Ranger uses 3.1 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Toyota Proace City Compact Van with 5.2 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota Proace City Compact Van offers clearly more range – reaching up to 337 km, about 295 km more than the Ford Ranger.

Ranger

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Ranger offers significantly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 136 HP. That’s roughly 145 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Ranger is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Toyota Proace City Compact Van takes 11.1 s. That’s about 2.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Ranger delivers substantially more torque with 697 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 397 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota Proace City Compact Van is significantly lighter – 1,358 kg compared to 2,405 kg. The difference is around 1,047 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Ford Ranger carries very slightly more – 989 kg compared to 921 kg. That’s a difference of about 68 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota Proace City Compact Van shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £22,400
Proace City Compact Van

Toyota Proace City Compact Van

  • Engine Type Electric, Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 102 - 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.2 - 6.6 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 337 km
Toyota Proace City Compact Van
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Toyota Proace City Compact Van

The Toyota Proace City Compact Van is a city-savvy workhorse that packs surprising practicality and smart packaging into a friendly, easy-to-drive package. It’s the kind of van that gets the job done without fuss — reliable, economical and just sensible enough to make fleet managers smile.

details

Ford Ranger

The Ford Ranger is a workhorse with the manners of a grown-up pickup—practical, tough, and surprisingly civilized on the road. It’s the sort of truck that laughs at mud on the weekend and performs like a sensible daily driver during the week, making it an easy sell for buyers who want capability without theatrics.

details
Toyota Proace City Compact Van
Ford Ranger

Costs and Consumption

Price
22,400 - 37,300 £
Price
48,400 - 57,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.2 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.1 - 10.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
337 km
Electric Range
42 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 149 g/km
co2
70 - 265 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Pickup
Seats
3 - 5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,358 - 1,837 kg
Curb weight
2,405 - 2,511 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,918 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
560 - 921 kg
Payload
845 - 989 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Diesel
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
102 - 136 HP
Power HP
240 - 281 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.1 - 13.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
205 - 300 Nm
Torque
600 - 697 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
75 - 100 kW
Power kW
177 - 207 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,499 cm3
Engine capacity
2,261 - 2,993 cm3

General

Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B
Brand
Toyota
Brand
Ford
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.