VS

Volvo EX30 vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (428 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (30,000 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX30 or Mazda CX-6e?

Volvo EX30 vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

Volvo EX30

3.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
details

Mazda CX-6e

  • very slightly more electric range
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EX30

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Volvo EX30 is substantially cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-6e costs 42,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,857 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX30 is moderately more efficient: consuming 17 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 1.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Mazda CX-6e offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 484 km, about 9 km more than the Volvo EX30.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 offers clearly more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 170 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 4.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX30 delivers considerably more torque with 543 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 253 Nm more.

EX30

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo EX30 is a bit lighter – 1,840 kg compared to 2,205 kg. The difference is around 365 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX30 carries marginally more – 390 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX30 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
EX30

Volvo EX30

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 428 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 339 - 475 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BYD Sealion 7
Mazda CX-6e
VS
In one corner is the tech‑packed BYD Sealion 7, a gadget-rich challenger promising range and features for the money; in the other is the Mazda CX‑6e, Mazda’s sleeker, driver-focused answer with a more premium feel. We’ll pit them on comfort, performance, tech and running costs so you know which one …
ZEEKR 7X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Today we line up the ZEEKR 7X against the Mazda CX-6e — a clash of tech-forward electric ambition and Mazda’s quietly polished refinement. Expect roomy practicality, electric punch and a few surprising details that could decide which one earns a spot in your garage.
Volvo EX30
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.

details
313302_Volvo_EX30
313320_Volvo_EX30
313329_Volvo_EX30_interior
313334_Volvo_EX30_interior
313297_Volvo_EX30

Reviews Volvo EX30

3.7 (6 Reviews)
rate
Michael
10 Feb 2026, 21:18:58

...the best electric car we've driven so far. Trouble-free, safe, tidy and easy to use.

The German predecessors (the Wolfsburg group) can be completely forgotten!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Julien B.
10 Feb 2026, 15:47:03

A car that could have been brilliant, ruined by technological dogmatism. Ninety‑five percent of this car’s problems are between the windshield and the steering wheel. The positives are undone by a botched implantation of technology at all costs. Basic functions are hard to access, buried in menus, and the constant, useless warnings and alerts make the experience frustrating and wreck the overall ergonomics. Add recurring issues with the door‑locking system that the dealer can’t fix after several visits, a range far below what’s promised, and a collision‑avoidance system that randomly takes dangerous initiatives, and I can say this is the worst car I’ve ever bought. After several months, I deeply regret this purchase.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marco
30 Dec 2025, 12:53:45

The onboard tech (tablet) takes too long to learn. It distracts from driving. Not suitable for the nearsighted — the tablet’s distance from your eyes basically forces you to wear trifocals. Letting off the gas slows the car, but it’s overly sensitive and you need time to get used to it. The buzzer for exceeding the speed limit is very annoying, and the system notices changes in road signs late. In short: driving it is stressful.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
NickoNamo
22 Dec 2025, 18:10:11

Compact, attractive and—above all—safe car with a modern interior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
serpimg_tXFAQx

Reviews Mazda CX-6e

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The trusted Mazda CX-5 takes on the new, electrified Mazda CX-6e in a straight-up duel of everyday usability, driving feel and running costs. We drive them back-to-back to see which one gives you the sharper handling, smarter packaging and better value for your money — and which is just prettier on …
Tesla Model Y
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Mazda CX-6e represent two distinct takes on the modern electric SUV: Tesla focuses on range, software and charging convenience, while Mazda emphasizes refinement, build quality and a more traditional driving feel. This comparison will help you weigh the Model Y’s performance …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-6e puts two of Mazda’s mid-size crossover offerings head-to-head to see which suits your needs best. I’ll focus on styling, interior quality, powertrain choices, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the smarter choice for daily use and long-term …
Toyota bZ4X
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Comparing the Toyota bZ4X and Mazda CX-6e highlights two different takes on the electric crossover: Toyota’s practical, reliability-focused approach versus Mazda’s more premium, driver-oriented take. I’ll run through range and charging, interior and tech, driving dynamics, and running costs so you …
XPeng G6
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The XPeng G6 and Mazda CX-6e represent two different takes on the modern electric crossover — the G6 pushes a tech-forward, range-focused EV agenda while the CX-6e brings Mazda’s driver-focused dynamics to electrification. This comparison will cut through spec sheets to show how they differ in …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EX60
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Volvo EX60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Kia EV5
Mazda CX-6e
VS
The Kia EV5 and Mazda CX-6e compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Toyota C-HR+
Mazda CX-6e
VS
Unsure whether the Toyota C-HR+ or the Mazda CX-6e is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Volvo EX30
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,000 - 47,800 £
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range
339 - 475 km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
Curb weight
2,205 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,838 mm
Width
1,935 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
370 - 390 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 428 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
110 - 315 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Mazda
What drivetrain options does the Volvo EX30 have?

The Volvo EX30 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.