VS

Volvo EX30 vs Renault R5 comparison

Compare performance (428 HP vs 540 HP), boot space and price (33,000 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX30 or Renault R5?

Volvo EX30 vs Renault R5: Key differences

Volvo EX30

3.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more electric range

Renault R5

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
  • marginally more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

EX30

City charmer vs Nordic minimalist

The Renault R5 arrives with a wink and a nod, a retro-inspired city sprite that trades pretension for personality, while the Volvo EX30 wears Scandinavian restraint like a tailored jacket — minimalist, confident and quietly premium. One feels made for bustling streets and playful commutes, the other aims to reassure on longer runs with an air of thoughtful engineering. Both stake out distinct territories in the compact electric world, so your mood and priorities will decide which vibe wins you over.

R5

What it’s like behind the wheel

Drive the R5 and you notice an eager, nimble character that invites short, cheeky blasts around town; it’s all about immediacy and grin-inducing responses. The EX30 is more composed, delivering a steady, planted feel that rewards relaxed, confident driving and feels more composed when the pace quickens. Each car tells a different story through steering weight, pedal feel and how they respond to intent, so test drives will quickly reveal which temperament suits your daily routine.

EX30

Cabin mood and creature comforts

Step inside the Renault and the cabin greets you with color, approachable switches and a deliberately friendly layout that prioritizes ease of use and occupant cheerfulness. Volvo’s interior leans into premium simplicity with thoughtful materials and an airy, calm ambiance that underlines comfort and long-distance composure. Both cabins have their strengths: one delights with charm and usability, the other soothes with restraint and supportive ergonomics.

R5

Living with it day to day

For city dwellers who prize easy parking, predictable packaging and fuss-free ownership, the Renault’s compact footprint and playful nature feel ideally matched to daily urban life. The EX30 suits those who split time between town and longer trips, offering a more assured presence on highways and a slightly more grown-up approach to practicality. Either way, usability is front and center: consider where most of your miles happen and which compromises you’re comfortable making.

EX30

Style, image and who notices

Choosing between these two also means choosing an image — the R5 broadcasts personality and retro-cool that turns heads in coffee-shop quarters, while the EX30 signals modern, understated confidence that appeals to tech-focused, design-aware buyers. Personal taste will rule: one is a conversation starter, the other a statement of refined intent. Both cars have been honed to attract different tribes, so pick the one that feels like you when you walk away from it.

R5

Matchmaking for buyers

If your life is city-centric, social and you love cars with character, the Renault will likely make more smiles per mile, whereas the Volvo will appeal if you want minimalist luxury, confident long-distance manners and a more reserved badge. Families, commuters and style-conscious drivers will each find clear reasons to favor one over the other, depending on priorities like comfort, agility and perceived value. Take both for a proper spin and stay with us — the DriveDuel Champion will be revealed afterwards.

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
VW ID.3
VS
The Renault 5 arrives as a cheeky retro reboot — compact, full of personality and perfect for nimble city living — while the VW ID.3 plays the sensible electric family car, offering more range, room and that reassuringly German calm. If you want fun and style for town runs choose the Renault 5; if …
Renault R5
Nissan Micra
VS
The cheeky, retro-modern Renault 5 squares up against the urbane, sensible Nissan Micra — two compact contenders fighting for your city keys. We’ll compare style, practicality, driving feel and running costs to find out which is the smarter buy for everyday life.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EX30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault R5 is visibly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Volvo EX30 costs 33,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,077 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Renault R5 is somewhat more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 17 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX30. That’s a difference of about 2.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX30 offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 476 km, about 71 km more than the Renault R5.

R5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault R5 offers visibly more power – delivering 540 HP compared to 428 HP. That’s roughly 112 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault R5 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.5 s, while the Volvo EX30 takes 3.6 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Renault R5 is clearly faster – reaching 270 km/h, while the Volvo EX30 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 90 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault R5 delivers clearly more torque with 4,800 Nm compared to 543 Nm. That’s about 4,257 Nm more.

EX30

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault R5 is visibly lighter – 1,447 kg compared to 1,840 kg. The difference is around 393 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault R5 offers marginally more boot space – 326 L compared to 318 L. That’s a difference of about 8 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Renault R5 offers barely more capacity – up to 1,106 L, about 106 L more than the Volvo EX30.

When it comes to payload, the Renault R5 carries marginally more – 418 kg compared to 390 kg. That’s a difference of about 28 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault R5 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
R5

Renault R5

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 122 - 540 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.8 - 15.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 307 - 405 km
details
Volvo EX30
Renault R5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.

details
313302_Volvo_EX30
313320_Volvo_EX30
313329_Volvo_EX30_interior
313334_Volvo_EX30_interior
313297_Volvo_EX30

Reviews Volvo EX30

3.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Michael
10 Feb 2026, 21:18:58

...the best electric car we've driven so far. Trouble-free, safe, tidy and easy to use.

The German predecessors (the Wolfsburg group) can be completely forgotten!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Julien B.
10 Feb 2026, 15:47:03

A car that could have been brilliant, ruined by technological dogmatism. Ninety‑five percent of this car’s problems are between the windshield and the steering wheel. The positives are undone by a botched implantation of technology at all costs. Basic functions are hard to access, buried in menus, and the constant, useless warnings and alerts make the experience frustrating and wreck the overall ergonomics. Add recurring issues with the door‑locking system that the dealer can’t fix after several visits, a range far below what’s promised, and a collision‑avoidance system that randomly takes dangerous initiatives, and I can say this is the worst car I’ve ever bought. After several months, I deeply regret this purchase.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marco
30 Dec 2025, 12:53:45

The onboard tech (tablet) takes too long to learn. It distracts from driving. Not suitable for the nearsighted — the tablet’s distance from your eyes basically forces you to wear trifocals. Letting off the gas slows the car, but it’s overly sensitive and you need time to get used to it. The buzzer for exceeding the speed limit is very annoying, and the system notices changes in road signs late. In short: driving it is stressful.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
NickoNamo
22 Dec 2025, 18:10:11

Compact, attractive and—above all—safe car with a modern interior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Renault R5

The Renault 5 is a cheeky city car that marries retro charm with modern flair, its playful looks promising smiles before you even start the engine. Practical enough for daily life yet lively enough to make short trips feel like mini adventures, it’s an irresistible choice for buyers who prefer personality to bland practicality.

details
D9BB3E56-4B0D-4E48-A734-11A1714B92A5
79A3C149-BC71-4BE3-A149-986DD84D251C
DDEACB99-545B-4C72-B12C-AB35E7B77365

Reviews Renault R5

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Walter
4 Nov 2025, 21:42:46

Practical, nimble, and fun to drive. For rather small drivers up to 1.75 m there's plenty of space even on the back seat. Useful driver-assist systems, and Android Auto works well. Very economical in summer. In winter a lot of energy is used in the first five minutes to bring the battery up to 20°C, which makes consumption on short winter trips very high.

Frequently compared as well

Alpine A290
Renault R5
VS
The Alpine A290 is the sharpened, slightly posher take on the same small‑car bones — think keener handling, a firmer chassis and a price that winks “premium.” The Renault 5, by contrast, is the cheeky everyday charmer: more affordable, practical and easygoing, so if you want smiles without a second …
CUPRA Born
Renault R5
VS
The CUPRA Born feels grown-up and focused — a proper hot‑hatch–inspired EV with genuine pace, sensible range and more practical space than its looks suggest, while the Renault 5 is a cheeky, retro‑flavoured city car built to charm tight streets rather than scorch the autobahn. Choose the Born if …
BYD Dolphin
Renault R5
VS
If you want no-nonsense electric practicality and impressive value for daily miles, the BYD Dolphin delivers usable range, clever packaging and tech that actually matters without breaking the bank. The Renault 5, meanwhile, sacrifices a little practicality for irresistible retro charm and …
CUPRA Born
Volvo EX30
VS
In the battle of electric compacts, the CUPRA Born and Volvo EX30 each bring unique strengths to the table for eco-conscious drivers. The CUPRA Born impresses with its sporty design and dynamic handling, making it an ideal choice for those seeking a spirited drive. On the other hand, the Volvo EX30 …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Renault R5
Fiat Grande Panda
VS
The Renault R5 and Fiat Grande Panda compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Volvo EX30
Volvo EX40
VS
In the rapidly growing electric vehicle market, the Volvo EX30 and EX40 stand out with their unique blend of style and sustainability. While the EX30 offers a smaller, more urban-friendly footprint, the EX40 boasts additional space and features tailored for family-oriented drivers. Both models …
Volvo EX30
Renault R5

Costs and Consumption
Price
33,000 - 49,100 £
Price
23,900 - 137,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
339 - 476 km
Electric Range
307 - 405 km
Battery Capacity
49 - 65 kWh
Battery Capacity
40 - 52 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
2 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
3 - 5
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
Curb weight
1,447 - 1,524 kg
Trunk capacity
318 L
Trunk capacity
326 L
Length
4,233 mm
Length
3,922 - 4,080 mm
Width
1,838 mm
Width
1,744 - 2,030 mm
Height
1,550 mm
Height
1,380 - 1,498 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,000 L
Max trunk capacity
1,106 L
Payload
370 - 390 kg
Payload
396 - 418 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
Power HP
122 - 540 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 5.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 9 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
150 - 270 km/h
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
Torque
225 - 4,800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
Power kW
90 - 397 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,027
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Volvo EX30 have?

The Volvo EX30 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.