@ Volvo Cars
@ Tesla, Inc.
VS

Volvo XC40 vs Tesla Model 3 – Which model is better for everyday use?

Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC40 or Tesla Model 3?

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Tesla Model 3

1 (1 Reviews)
rate
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Volvo XC40 vs Tesla Model 3: A Comprehensive Comparison

As electric vehicles gain momentum and modern SUVs continue to capture attention, the comparison between the Volvo XC40 and the Tesla Model 3 serves as an intriguing case study. Both vehicles represent the forefront of automotive innovation but cater to different preferences and needs. This article delves into their technical aspects and innovations, shedding light on which model could be the perfect fit for you.

Model 3 @ Tesla, Inc.

Design and Dimensions

The Volvo XC40, an SUV, measures 4425 mm in length, 1863 mm in width, and stands 1652 mm tall, providing a spacious and elevated driving experience. In contrast, the Tesla Model 3, classified as a hatchback, is longer at 4720 mm, slightly wider at 1850 mm, and significantly lower at 1441 mm. The spaciousness and cargo capacity of the XC40 (452 liters) are commendable for an SUV, but the Model 3 outshines with a trunk capacity of 594 liters, making it more practical for those who require extra storage.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Powertrain and Performance

When it comes to power, the XC40 offers a choice between two petrol mild hybrid engines with outputs of 163 and 197 HP. Its dual-clutch automatic transmission provides responsive gear shifts, while the front-wheel-drive system offers a smooth drive. The XC40 accelerates from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.6 to 8.6 seconds, depending on the engine choice.

On the flip side, the Tesla Model 3 offers a range of electric powertrains, with variants producing between 283 and 460 HP and torque figures ranging from 420 to an astounding 723 Nm. The Model 3’s breathtaking acceleration can clock in as low as 3.1 seconds for the Performance variant, showcasing the electrification potential. Its rear-wheel-drive and all-wheel-drive options enhance flexibility, catering to diverse driving preferences.

Model 3 @ Tesla, Inc.

Fuel Efficiency and Range

The XC40, with a fuel consumption of approximately 6.5 L/100 km, emphasizes traditional fuel efficiency. In terms of emissions, it holds a CO2 efficiency class of E, with CO2 outputs around 147-148 g/km. It offers a fuel tank capacity of 54 liters, providing decent range but within the limitations of a petrol engine.

Conversely, the Tesla Model 3 shines in terms of electric efficiency, with consumption varying from 12.5 to 16.5 kWh/100 km across its lineup. Most models boast an impressive electric range, with the highest variant reaching an impressive 702 km on a single charge. Furthermore, Tesla’s charging infrastructure continues to be a significant plus, easing the anxiety often associated with electric vehicle ownership.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Interior and Technology

Inside the XC40, drivers will find a Scandinavian design aesthetic, featuring high-quality materials and an intuitive layout. The adoption of modern technology includes a fully digital instrument cluster and a large touchscreen infotainment system, offering seamless connectivity and driver assistance features.

In comparison, the Tesla Model 3 focuses on minimalistic design, dominated by a massive central touchscreen that controls nearly all vehicle functions. Features such as Autopilot and over-the-air updates set the Model 3 apart as a leader in automotive innovation. The interior is spacious, but the refinement of materials is a step behind the XC40’s luxurious feel.

Model 3 @ Tesla, Inc.

Safety Features

Safety is a hallmark of both brands. The Volvo XC40 is equipped with Volvo’s renowned safety technology, including advanced driver-assistance systems and a high safety rating. Features like lane keeping assist, collision avoidance, and adaptive cruise control are standard, underscoring Volvo’s commitment to safety.

Similarly, the Tesla Model 3 offers a robust suite of safety features, highlighted by its AI-driven Autopilot system. The car has also received top marks in safety testing, allowing it to compete fiercely in this critical area.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Conclusion: Which One Should You Choose?

In conclusion, the choice between the Volvo XC40 and Tesla Model 3 largely depends on your priorities. If you value an SUV with a luxurious finish, traditional fuel efficiency, and a reputation for safety, the Volvo XC40 is a commendable choice. However, if you are inclined toward a cutting-edge electric vehicle with unmatched acceleration and efficiency, the Tesla Model 3 will likely win your favor.

Regardless of choice, both vehicles are excellent representatives of their respective categories, showcasing the continuous evolution of the automotive industry. Whether you're navigating urban landscapes or embarking on long journeys, you can expect either to deliver an exceptional driving experience.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Model 3 @ Tesla, Inc.

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Tesla Model 3 has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 34300 £, while the Volvo XC40 costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 2485 £.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Tesla Model 3 has a significantly edge – offering 460 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 263 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Tesla Model 3 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 3.10 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 4.50 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Tesla Model 3 performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 262 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 82 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Tesla Model 3 pulls decisively stronger with 660 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 360 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is slight lighter – 1688 kg compared to 1822 kg. The difference is around 134 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Tesla Model 3 offers noticeable more room – 594 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 142 L.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 noticeable takes the win – 532 kg compared to 333 kg. That’s a difference of about 199 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Tesla Model 3 proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Tesla Model 3 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Volvo XC40
Tesla Model 3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £34,300
Model 3 @ Tesla, Inc.

Tesla Model 3

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 283 - 460 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.2 - 16.7 kWh
  • Electric Range : 550 - 750 km
details

Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Tesla Model 3

1 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Tesla Model 3 slices through daily commuting with a silent, confident shove that makes petrolheads reassess their life choices, while its minimalist cabin feels more like a slick gadget gallery than a traditional car interior. For buyers after a fuss-free, tech-forward electric with plenty of grin factor and low running drama, it’s hard to beat—just don't be surprised when the car updates itself overnight.

details
0x0-Model3_06 @ Tesla, Inc.
0x0-Model3_RHD_03 @ Tesla, Inc.
0x0-Model3_12 @ Tesla, Inc.
0x0-Model3_09 @ Tesla, Inc.

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (2 Reviews)
rate

Reviews Tesla Model 3

1 (1 Reviews)
rate

Top Car Comparisons

@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Volvo XC40
Tesla Model 3
XC40 @ Volvo Cars
Model 3 @ Tesla, Inc.

Costs and Consumption
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Price
34300 - 50100 £
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13.2 - 16.7 kWh
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
550 - 750 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
64.5 - 83 kWh
co2
147 - 148 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
4
Curb weight
1688 kg
Curb weight
1822 - 1929 kg
Trunk capacity
452 L
Trunk capacity
594 L
Length
4425 mm
Length
4720 - 4724 mm
Width
1863 mm
Width
1850 mm
Height
1652 mm
Height
1431 - 1440 mm
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
532 kg
Payload
303 - 333 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Power HP
283 - 460 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.1 - 6.1 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
201 - 262 km/h
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Torque
420 - 660 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Power kW
208 - 338 kW
Engine capacity
1969 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Tesla

Similar Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ Renault Group Media
Renault Austral
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Renault Austral and the Volvo XC40 each offer distinct attributes catering to different customer desires. The Renault Austral emphasizes affordability and efficient urban maneuverability, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers seeking practicality. …
@ Toyota Motor Corporation
Toyota RAV4
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Toyota RAV4 stands out with its robust reliability and impressive fuel efficiency, making it a popular choice for families and adventurers alike. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 features a more premium design and advanced safety technology, appealing to those …
@ Tesla, Inc.
Tesla Model 3
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Elroq
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Tesla Model 3 and the Skoda Elroq, the electric sedan showcases Tesla's cutting-edge technology and impressive range, making it a formidable contender in the EV market. Meanwhile, the Skoda Elroq impresses with its spacious interior and practicality, …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the CUPRA Terramar stands out with its sporty styling and performance-oriented features, appealing to driving enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40 offers a more refined interior and a strong emphasis on safety, making it an ideal choice for families. Both …
@ Lexus / Toyota Motor Corporation
Lexus LBX
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Lexus LBX and Volvo XC40 stand out with their distinctive styles and premium features. The LBX impresses with its sleek design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers, while the XC40 offers a robust driving experience and top-notch …
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC40?

The Volvo XC40 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.

do not click