VS

Volvo XC60 vs Mercedes C-Class EQ comparison

Compare performance (406 HP vs 489 HP), boot space and price (58,300 £ vs 58,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or Mercedes C-Class EQ?

Volvo XC60 vs Mercedes C-Class EQ: Key differences

Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly lighter
details

Mercedes C-Class EQ

  • very slightly cheaper
  • a bit more power
  • considerably more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mercedes C-Class EQ is very slightly cheaper – starting at 58,000 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 58,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 239 £.

As for electric range, the Mercedes C-Class EQ offers considerably more range – reaching up to 753 km, about 674 km more than the Volvo XC60.

C-Class EQ

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes C-Class EQ offers a bit more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 406 HP. That’s roughly 83 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes C-Class EQ is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Volvo XC60 takes 4.9 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes C-Class EQ delivers slightly more torque with 800 Nm compared to 669 Nm. That’s about 131 Nm more.

XC60

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo XC60 is slightly lighter – 2,150 kg compared to 2,460 kg. The difference is around 310 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries barely more – 510 kg compared to 505 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes C-Class EQ stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £58,000
C-Class EQ

Mercedes C-Class EQ

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 489 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.3 - 15.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 706 - 753 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Comparing the Volvo XC60 and the Volvo EX60 pits a familiar midsize premium SUV against Volvo’s new all-electric contender: the XC60 offers refined petrol and hybrid options while the EX60 focuses on pure-electric range, sharper tech and lower running costs. If you’re choosing between established …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Volvo XC60
Mercedes C-Class EQ

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.7 (7 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mercedes C-Class EQ

The Mercedes C‑Class EQ blends the familiar poise and luxury of the C‑Class with Mercedes' EQ electric ethos, delivering a quietly refined and modern driving experience. Inside, it pairs upscale materials and tech-forward touches with a composed ride that suits both city commuting and longer journeys.

details
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (1)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (2)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (3)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (4)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (5)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (6)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (7)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (9)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (8)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev

Reviews Mercedes C-Class EQ

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
VW Tayron
VS
The Volvo XC60 and the VW Tayron are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want a blend of style, practicality and advanced tech, but they offer distinctly different personalities. The XC60 leans toward Scandinavian refinement, safety and a comfortable ride, while the VW Tayron delivers a more …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
BMW X1
Volvo XC60
VS
Deciding between the BMW X1 and the Volvo XC60 is essentially a choice between a sportier, more driver-focused compact SUV and a roomier, comfort-and-safety-oriented mid‑size contender. This comparison focuses on interior space, driving dynamics, fuel economy and running costs to help you pick the …
Mercedes C-Class EQ
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Mercedes C‑Class EQ and the Mercedes GLC EQ pits a sleek, electrically powered executive saloon against a compact electric SUV — two different takes on premium Mercedes electrification. This brief comparison will focus on their size, practicality, driving feel and tech so you can …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC60
VS
Choosing between the Ford Kuga and the Volvo XC60 comes down to whether you want the Kuga’s practical, value-driven approach or the XC60’s more premium, safety-focused experience. I’ll compare their space, comfort, technology, running costs and driving feel to help you pick the SUV that best fits …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC60
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stands out as a versatile compact SUV, offering excellent fuel efficiency and a practical interior. In contrast, the Volvo XC60 is a luxury midsize SUV that impresses with its superior safety features and high-end cabin materials. While the Qashqai is a great choice for those …
Mercedes GLC
Volvo XC60
VS
The Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 are two of the top contenders in the compact luxury SUV class, each bringing a distinct take on comfort, technology and driving dynamics. If you prioritize sporty refinement and a plush, tech-forward cabin the GLC is a strong choice; if you value Scandinavian design, …
Volvo XC60
Mercedes C-Class EQ

Costs and Consumption
Price
58,300 - 71,400 £
Price
58,000 - 67,600 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.3 - 15.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
79 km
Electric Range
706 - 753 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
59 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Sedan
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,150 kg
Curb weight
2,460 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
470 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,902 mm
Width
1,892 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
510 kg
Payload
505 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
335 - 406 HP
Power HP
489 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 5.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
589 - 669 Nm
Torque
800 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
247 - 299 kW
Power kW
360 kW
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.