Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Volvo XC60 vs Skoda Kamiq comparison
Compare performance (455 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (49,200 £ vs 22,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or Skoda Kamiq?
XC60
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Skoda Kamiq is considerably cheaper – starting at 22,300 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,923 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 2.8 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Skoda Kamiq with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 2.5 L/100km.
Kamiq
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers substantially more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 305 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Skoda Kamiq takes 8.1 s. That’s about 3.2 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Skoda Kamiq is slightly faster – reaching 216 km/h, while the Volvo XC60 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 36 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers considerably more torque with 709 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 459 Nm more.
XC60
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kamiq is considerably lighter – 1,231 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 669 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers somewhat more boot space – 483 L compared to 400 L. That’s a difference of about 83 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC60 offers barely more capacity – up to 1,543 L, about 148 L more than the Skoda Kamiq.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries barely more – 550 kg compared to 539 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo XC60 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £49,200
Volvo XC60
Volvo XC60
Skoda Kamiq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Volvo XC60
The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.
details
Skoda Kamiq
The Skoda Kamiq is a neatly packaged city crossover that pairs practical space with unshowy, thoughtful design. It’s easy to live with, economical to run and full of clever details that make daily driving feel intelligently sorted rather than flashy.
details
Volvo XC60
Skoda Kamiq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
|
Price
22,300 - 32,700 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
64 - 169 g/km
|
co2
121 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
|
Curb weight
1,231 - 1,340 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
|
Trunk capacity
400 L
|
|
Length
4,708 mm
|
Length
4,241 mm
|
|
Width
1,902 mm
|
Width
1,793 mm
|
|
Height
1,655 mm
|
Height
1,562 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,395 L
|
|
Payload
510 - 550 kg
|
Payload
439 - 539 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.1 - 11 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
183 - 216 km/h
|
|
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.