VS

Volvo XC60 vs Toyota C-HR comparison

Compare performance (455 HP vs 223 HP), boot space and price (49,200 £ vs 29,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo XC60 or Toyota C-HR?

Volvo XC60 vs Toyota C-HR: Key differences

Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • slightly more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space

Toyota C-HR

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • noticeably more efficient
  • markedly lighter

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC60

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Toyota C-HR is substantially cheaper – starting at 29,100 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,057 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Toyota C-HR uses 2.3 L/100km and is noticeably more efficient than the Volvo XC60 with 2.8 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo XC60 offers slightly more range – reaching up to 82 km, about 16 km more than the Toyota C-HR.

C-HR

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers considerably more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 232 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Toyota C-HR takes 7.4 s. That’s about 2.5 s quicker.

XC60

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR is markedly lighter – 1,505 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 395 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo XC60 offers very slightly more boot space – 483 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 36 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries visibly more – 550 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 125 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,200
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its …
Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …
Volvo XC60
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Toyota C-HR

The Toyota C-HR cuts a striking figure with its angular styling and coupe-like profile, so you’ll never go unnoticed in the supermarket car park. It balances everyday practicality with a nimble, city-friendly personality, making routine commutes feel a touch more fun without asking for forgiveness.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr

Reviews Toyota C-HR

4.8 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Meet the Volvo XC60 and the new Volvo EX60 — two mid‑size premium SUVs that look like cousins but drive like rivals, one rooted in combustion tradition and the other staking Volvo’s claim in the electric future. Which should you buy: the familiar, comfort-first XC60 that does everything reliably …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla
VS
The Toyota C‑HR is the flamboyant, coupe‑like crossover that trades rear-seat space for eye-catching design and a higher stance, while the Toyota Corolla is the dependable compact that serves up better packaging, comfort and efficient powertrains. If you want personality and city swagger, pick the …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Prius
VS
In this DriveDuel showdown we pit the sharp, coupe‑like Toyota C‑HR against the evergreen Toyota Prius to see whether style and urban swagger can outshine outright thriftiness. Choose the C‑HR for crossover looks, punchy handling and personality; pick the Prius for class‑leading fuel economy, …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris
VS
In this head-to-head comparison, the Toyota C-HR and Toyota Yaris showcase their distinct personalities in the subcompact segment. While the C-HR offers a bold design and a more spacious interior, the Yaris stands out with its nimbleness and fuel efficiency, making it an ideal choice for urban …
Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Unsure whether the Toyota C-HR or the Toyota C-HR+ is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like the posh roommate you suddenly inherited — plush cabin, hushed hybrid powertrain and a dashboard that whispers premium — while the Toyota C‑HR plays the affordable style rebel with quirky looks and surprisingly practical packaging. Choose the LBX for serene luxury and badge …
Volvo XC60
Toyota C-HR

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
Price
29,100 - 42,800 £
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Electric Range
66 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
64 - 169 g/km
co2
52 - 116 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
71 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
Curb weight
1,505 - 1,755 kg
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Length
4,708 mm
Length
-
Width
1,902 mm
Width
1,832 mm
Height
1,655 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
510 - 550 kg
Payload
375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
Engine capacity
1,798 - 1,987 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, B
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Toyota
What drive types are available for the Volvo XC60?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.