Compare performance (299 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (34,800 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW ID.4 or Volvo XC40?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
The 2024 automotive market is rife with innovative SUVs, and two standout contenders are the Volvo XC40 and the VW ID.4. Each caters to a distinct audience with its unique technology, performance, and design. Let's delve into the specifics and see how these SUVs compare.
The Volvo XC40 makes its mark with a Petrol Mild Hybrid Engine (MHEV) that comes in two power outputs: 163 HP and 197 HP. Matched with a dual-clutch automatic transmission and a front-wheel-drive system, the XC40 reaches 0-100 km/h in 8.6 seconds (for the 163 HP variant) to 7.6 seconds (with 197 HP). It boasts a maximum speed of 180 km/h and a torque that ranges from 265 Nm to 300 Nm. The engine's 1969 cm3 capacity and consumption of 6.5 L/100km offer a balanced performance for eco-conscious drivers.
In contrast, the VW ID.4 is an all-electric marvel. Depending on the variant, power ranges from 170 HP to 340 HP. As an electric vehicle, it provides instantaneous torque, varying from 310 Nm to a notable 679 Nm for sure-footed performance. The ID.4 reaches 0-100 km/h in an exhilarating 5.4 seconds to a more measured 9.0 seconds, with a top speed fluctuating between 160 km/h and 180 km/h. Arguably, the ID.4's electric range is a highlight, stretching up to 572 km on a single charge.
Both SUVs comfortably seat five passengers and offer ample cargo space. The Volvo XC40 features a trunk capacity of 452 L within its compact structure measuring 4425 mm in length, 1863 mm in width, and 1652 mm in height. This design complements its curb weight of 1688 kg, offering a balanced ride and reasonable payload capacity of 532 kg.
Meanwhile, the VW ID.4 is slightly larger at 4584 mm in length and provides more cargo capacity with its 543 L trunk. Despite its larger dimensions, the ID.4's sleek design ensures a competitive curb weight ranging from 1979 kg to 2261 kg, depending on the model. With a payload capacity nearing 541 kg, it's well-suited for larger families or those needing extra utility.
The Volvo XC40's CO2 emissions are measured between 147 g/km and 148 g/km, placing it in the CO2 Efficiency Class E. Its hybrid technology aims to balance fuel efficiency with traditional power.
The VW ID.4 takes the lead in eco-credentials with zero tailpipe emissions, falling into the top tier CO2 Efficiency Class A. The efficiency of the ID.4's battery system, varying from 52 kWh to 77 kWh, achieves a consumption as low as 15.8 kWh/100 km, illustrating VW's commitment to sustainable technology.
The choice between the Volvo XC40 and the VW ID.4 hinges on personal preferences and priorities. The XC40 is ideal for those who appreciate the familiarity of a petrol engine with a hybrid twist, delivering solid performance and a stylish design. Conversely, the VW ID.4 caters to forward-thinking drivers seeking an electric vehicle that combines range, power, and eco-friendliness in a modern package.
In the end, both SUVs represent the future of automotive innovation — whether through hybrid capabilities or all-electric powertrains. Your decision ultimately comes down to whether you prefer a petrol hybrid or quintessentially electric drive.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
VW ID.4 is markedly cheaper – starting at 34,800 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,123 £.
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the VW ID.4 offers clearly more power – delivering 299 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW ID.4 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.1 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW ID.4 delivers substantially more torque with 545 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 245 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo XC40 is visibly lighter – 1,688 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 377 kg.
When it comes to payload, the VW ID.4 carries only slightly more – 554 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 22 kg.
The VW ID.4 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The VW ID.4 is a practical, family-friendly electric SUV that balances everyday usability with a calm, composed driving character. It pairs a roomy, well-finished cabin and easy-to-use tech with predictable handling and convenient charging options, making it a sensible choice for buyers switching to electric.
details
The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
34,800 - 47,600 £
|
Price
41,900 - 46,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
425 - 570 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,219 kg
|
Curb weight
1,688 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,852 mm
|
Width
1,863 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
525 - 554 kg
|
Payload
532 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 299 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.1 - 8.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
310 - 545 Nm
|
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
140 - 220 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2026
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España