Compare performance (150 HP vs 115 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 20,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Cross or Kia Stonic?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the highly competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Kia Stonic and VW T-Cross stand out as two strong contenders. Both offer unique features, enticing designs, and an impressive array of technology and performance. In this article, we will compare these two models based on their technical specifications, innovations, and overall user experience.
The Kia Stonic boasts a sleek and sporty design characterized by its bold front grille, stylish LED headlights, and a compact stance. Measuring 4140 mm in length and 1760 mm in width, the Stonic has an assertive road presence complemented by a height of 1505 mm. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross presents a more robust and practical design. With slightly larger dimensions of 4127 mm in length, 1784 mm in width, and a height of 1573 mm, the T-Cross provides a higher driving position, enhancing visibility for the driver.
The Kia Stonic is equipped with a choice of petrol engines, including a 1.0-liter 3-cylinder with outputs of 100 HP and 79 HP and a larger 1.2-liter 4-cylinder engine. In terms of performance, it offers acceleration from 0-100 km/h in 11.3 seconds for the 100 HP variant, while the fuel consumption ranges from 5.5 to 5.8 L/100km. The T-Cross, on the other hand, features a more diverse engine lineup with petrol options including a 1.0-liter engine producing 95 HP and a more powerful 1.5-liter variant generating up to 150 HP. The T-Cross achieves acceleration in just 8.4 seconds, indicative of its sporty character, while maintaining a competitive fuel efficiency of 5.6 to 6 L/100km.
Both the Stonic and T-Cross offer manual and automatic transmission options, ensuring a driving experience that caters to different preferences. The Stonic features a manual gearbox as well as an automatic dual-clutch transmission, providing smooth and responsive gear changes. On the other hand, the T-Cross excels with its advanced DSG transmission, enhancing acceleration and efficiency while offering a more engaging driving experience.
Inside, the Kia Stonic provides ample space for five passengers with a trunk capacity of 352 liters, which is sufficient for daily use. The dashboard is well-equipped with modern connectivity features, including a touchscreen infotainment system compatible with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. In contrast, the VW T-Cross shines with its spacious interior and impressive trunk capacity of 455 liters. The cabin also features high-quality materials and a modern layout, including a digital cockpit option that enhances the driving experience.
Safety is a priority for both manufacturers, with the Stonic offering a robust suite of safety features such as electronic stability control, traction control, and advanced driver-assistance systems. The T-Cross also excels in this area, featuring similar safety technologies alongside optional predictive cruise control and emergency braking, further enhancing its appeal to safety-conscious buyers.
In conclusion, both the Kia Stonic and VW T-Cross bring unique strengths to the table. The Stonic stands out with its sporty design and efficient performance, making it a great fit for urban environments. Meanwhile, the T-Cross offers a larger interior, enhanced performance options, and superior technology, making it a compelling choice for families and those who prioritize space. Ultimately, the decision will hinge on personal preferences regarding style, performance, and practicality in the ever-evolving subcompact SUV landscape.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Kia Stonic is very slightly cheaper – starting at 20,100 £ , while the VW T-Cross costs 21,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,260 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW T-Cross uses 5.4 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.2 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the VW T-Cross offers markedly more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 35 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Cross is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.4 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.7 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW T-Cross delivers moderately more torque with 250 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Kia Stonic is very slightly lighter – 1,205 kg compared to 1,267 kg. The difference is around 62 kg.
Looking at boot space, the VW T-Cross offers visibly more boot space – 455 L compared to 352 L. That’s a difference of about 103 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW T-Cross carries marginally more – 480 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.
The VW T-Cross stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The VW T-Cross turns everyday practicality into a style statement, offering a roomy-feeling cabin, clever storage and playful design that suits town life and family duties alike. On the road it's composed and relaxed, rewarding buyers who want the raised seating and confident presence of an SUV without the weighty compromises.
details
The Kia Stonic is a sprightly compact crossover that mixes city-friendly agility with a cheeky, modern design — perfect for buyers who want style without sacrificing sense. Inside it serves up clever practicality and a bright, well-equipped cabin, making everyday driving feel a bit more fun than it has any right to be.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
|
Price
20,100 - 26,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
124 - 136 g/km
|
co2
127 - 133 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
|
Curb weight
1,205 - 1,270 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
455 L
|
Trunk capacity
352 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
4,165 mm
|
|
Width
1,784 mm
|
Width
1,760 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,520 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
1,155 L
|
|
Payload
463 - 480 kg
|
Payload
440 - 445 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
179 - 182 km/h
|
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
Kia
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España