Compare performance (150 HP vs 115 HP), boot space and price (26,400 £ vs 20,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Roc or Kia Stonic?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In an ever-evolving automotive landscape, compact SUVs steal the spotlight with their versatility and style. Two formidable contenders in this category are the Kia Stonic and the VW T-Roc. Boasting innovative features and distinct characteristics, these models cater to diverse needs. Let's dive into the technical details and innovations that set them apart.
The Kia Stonic and VW T-Roc, both classified as compact SUVs, bring their unique flair to the table. The Stonic, with its length of 4140 mm, width of 1760 mm, and height of 1505 mm, showcases a sleek, urban-friendly design. Meanwhile, the T-Roc is slightly larger, offering lengths varying from 4236 mm to 4271 mm, width from 1811 mm to 1819 mm, and height ranging from 1527 mm to 1584 mm. This extra space translates into more interior room for occupants and luggage, emphasizing practicality for larger loads or adventurous trips.
The Kia Stonic offers a range of petrol and petrol MHEV (Mild Hybrid Electric Vehicle) engines, delivering power outputs between 79 HP and 100 HP. It comes with either a manual gearbox or a dual-clutch automatic transmission, both operating on front-wheel drive. The Stonic provides a balance between efficiency and spirited driving with an acceleration from 0-100 km/h in 11.3 to 14.2 seconds, and a top speed of up to 179 km/h.
In contrast, the VW T-Roc presents a wider selection of engines, including both petrol and diesel options. Boasting power outputs from 115 HP to a sporty 300 HP, the T-Roc caters to varied preferences. It's available with manual, dual-clutch automatic transmissions, and both front-wheel and all-wheel drive configurations. The T-Roc achieves 0-100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, especially with the higher output models, making it a thrill for those who value performance.
When it comes to fuel consumption, the Kia Stonic shows a range from 5.5 to 5.8 L/100km, emitting between 125 to 132 g/km of CO2, making it a sensible choice for the eco-conscious. It is classified under CO2 efficiency class D.
The VW T-Roc, with its broader range of engines, offers fuel consumption figures between 4.7 to 8.5 L/100km and CO2 emissions from 125 to 194 g/km. This efficiency range matches its diverse powertrain options and is classified from D to G in CO2 efficiency classes, giving buyers more flexibility in balancing performance and economy.
Designed to accommodate five passengers comfortably, the Kia Stonic provides a tranquil ride with its well-appointed cabin. It features a trunk capacity of 352 liters, sufficient for weekend getaways or daily commutes.
The VW T-Roc amplifies interior space with trunk capacities ranging from 284 to 445 liters, depending on the chosen model. This allows for versatile cargo solutions, whether it's everyday errands or long road trips, supported by its slightly larger payload capacity, ranging from 368 to 509 kg.
Whether prioritizing style, performance, or practicality, both the Kia Stonic and the VW T-Roc offer compelling propositions in the compact SUV segment. The Stonic appeals with its urban-friendly dimensions and efficient operation, while the T-Roc stands out with its larger body, varied engine options, and robust performance capabilities. The decision ultimately depends on individual driving preferences and lifestyle needs.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Kia Stonic is visibly cheaper – starting at 20,400 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,047 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW T-Roc uses 5.5 L/100km and is barely more efficient than the Kia Stonic with 5.6 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the VW T-Roc offers markedly more power – delivering 150 HP compared to 115 HP. That’s roughly 35 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Roc is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.9 s, while the Kia Stonic takes 10.7 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the VW T-Roc delivers somewhat more torque with 250 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Kia Stonic is visibly lighter – 1,205 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 260 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Kia Stonic offers moderately more boot space – 352 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 68 L.
When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries moderately more – 515 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 70 kg.
The VW T-Roc is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.
details
The Kia Stonic is a sprightly compact crossover that mixes city-friendly agility with a cheeky, modern design — perfect for buyers who want style without sacrificing sense. Inside it serves up clever practicality and a bright, well-equipped cabin, making everyday driving feel a bit more fun than it has any right to be.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
|
Price
20,400 - 26,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.6 - 5.7 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
126 - 143 g/km
|
co2
126 - 128 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
4 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
|
Curb weight
1,205 - 1,270 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
284 L
|
Trunk capacity
352 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
|
Width
1,760 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
368 - 515 kg
|
Payload
440 - 445 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
100 - 115 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.7 - 12.1 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
172 - 200 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 85 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
Kia
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España