VS

VW T-Roc vs MG HS comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (26400 £ vs 30000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Roc or MG HS?

VW T-Roc vs MG HS: Key differences

VW T-Roc

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • slightly lighter

MG HS

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • convincingly more power
  • convincingly more efficient
  • noticeable quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • significantly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Roc

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW T-Roc has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 26400 £ , while the MG HS costs 30000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3553 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG HS manages with 0.50 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.50 L. The difference is about 5 L per 100 km.

HS

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the MG HS has a convincingly edge – offering 272 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG HS is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 2.10 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: MG HS pulls distinct stronger with 350 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.

T-Roc

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, VW T-Roc is slightly lighter – 1465 kg compared to 1735 kg. The difference is around 270 kg.

In terms of boot space, the MG HS offers significantly more room – 507 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 223 L.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc evident takes the win – 515 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 115 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG HS is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
VW T-Roc
MG HS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £30,000
HS

MG HS

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 224 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.5 - 5.5 L
  • Electric Range : 100 km
details

VW T-Roc

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate

The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

MG HS

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The MG HS, also known as the EHS in its hybrid variant, is a midsize SUV that combines modern design with a focus on comfort and technology. Its spacious interior offers a premium feel, enhanced by quality materials and an array of advanced features aimed at ensuring a smooth driving experience. Known for its efficiency, the MG HS/EHS delivers an enjoyable ride whether navigating city streets or taking on longer road trips.

details
Left-Front-45
Front-Side
Right-Back-45
Side-large-interior-1

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Reviews MG HS

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Mac Finn
29 Oct 2025, 11:27:52

Good perfomance and superbly low fuel consumption in daily use.

VW T-Roc
MG HS

Costs and Consumption
Price
26400 - 38600 £
Price
30000 - 36000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption L/100km
0.5 - 5.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
100 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 143 g/km
co2
14 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
Curb weight
1735 - 1930 kg
Trunk capacity
284 L
Trunk capacity
507 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 515 kg
Payload
400 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Power HP
224 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Torque
340 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Power kW
165 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3
Engine capacity
1496 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, B
Brand
VW
Brand
MG

Similar Comparisons

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca is the sensible, roomy sibling that prioritises practicality and comfort, while the VW T‑Roc plays the cooler, more characterful role with sharper styling and a slightly cheekier drive — both share the VW Group's solid underpinnings and similar engines. Choose the Ateca if you need …
VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
Volvo XC40
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Roc
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers the Toyota Yaris Cross and VW T‑Roc take very different approaches: the Yaris Cross is an ultra-efficient, hybrid-savvy city specialist with nimble handling and low running costs, while the T‑Roc delivers bigger presence, punchier engines and more interior space …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive realm of compact SUVs, the Ford Kuga and VW T-Roc stand out for their unique blend of style and practicality. The Ford Kuga impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver assistance features, making it a top pick for families seeking comfort and safety. Meanwhile, the …
Kia Sportage
VW T-Roc
VS
The Kia Sportage piles on space, comfort and kit — plus that mighty warranty — making family life a breeze, while the VW T-Roc counters with tidier dimensions, sharper steering and a dash of VW polish for city duty. If you want maximum value and long-haul calm, go Sportage; if you crave a nimble …
Is the VW T-Roc offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.