VS

VW T-Roc vs Vauxhall Mokka comparison

Compare performance (150 HP vs 281 HP), boot space and price (26,400 £ vs 23,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW T-Roc or Vauxhall Mokka?

VW T-Roc vs Vauxhall Mokka: Key differences

VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more trunk space
details

Vauxhall Mokka

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat cheaper
  • significantly more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

T-Roc

Quick take: Vauxhall Mokka VS VW T‑Roc

Vauxhall Mokka VS VW T-Roc puts a stylish, city‑biased compact SUV against a more grown‑up, space‑oriented rival. The Vauxhall Mokka projects personality and tight‑city agility, while the VW T‑Roc leans into quiet confidence and everyday practicality. Buyers notice the Mokka first for its bold looks and easy urban manners; the T‑Roc wins hearts with a calmer ride and a more substantial interior. Choosing between them is about prioritising style and manoeuvrability (Mokka) or space and perceived quality (T‑Roc).

Mokka

Comfort and long‑distance behaviour

The Vauxhall Mokka feels composed around town and rewards relaxed, low‑speed cruising with a quiet electric option, but its ride can get fussy over long motorway miles. By contrast, the VW T‑Roc is engineered for longer runs: better sound insulation, a steadier posture at speed and an adaptive suspension that soothes big road undulations. In everyday commuting the Mokka’s softer, city‑tuned manners are pleasant, yet repeat long‑distance drivers will appreciate the T‑Roc’s composed highway demeanour. If motorway serenity and low cabin noise matter most, the T‑Roc takes the edge; if short trips and a tranquil electric city commute are the norm, the Mokka holds strong appeal.

T-Roc

City friendliness and everyday usability

In tight streets the Vauxhall Mokka is noticeably easier to place, with compact footprint and parking aids that make city chores less stressful. The VW T‑Roc manages urban driving too but presents a taller stance and slightly larger footprint that trade off a touch of manoeuvrability for a better view over traffic. Cockpit ergonomics differ: the Mokka aims for a clean, modern layout with some touch reliance, while the T‑Roc brings familiar Volkswagen controls that feel predictable and less fiddly. For apartment dwellers and frequent parkers the Mokka’s city‑centric packaging is more user‑friendly, whereas the T‑Roc suits buyers who want city ability plus a more practical daily cabin.

Mokka

Cabin feel and perceived quality

The VW T‑Roc clearly outpoints the Vauxhall Mokka on material quality and the sense of solidity when you close the doors; soft trims and tidy joins give the T‑Roc a near‑premium aura. The Mokka trades some of that tactile refinement for a more graphic, contemporary dashboard and visually fresh touches that appeal to style‑minded buyers. Controls in the T‑Roc tend to feel heavier and more precise, whereas the Mokka’s interface is simpler but occasionally less responsive in its touch sections. If a grown‑up, reassuring interior is a priority the T‑Roc will satisfy more often; if modern looks and a youthful cockpit matter, the Mokka makes a stronger first impression.

T-Roc

Practicality, rear space and load carrying

The VW T‑Roc wins the practicality battle in day‑to‑day terms: more usable rear legroom, a flexible rear seat layout and a larger, easier‑loaded boot make it the better family companion. The Vauxhall Mokka’s boot and rear cabin are tighter, with a higher lip and less forgiving access that curtails bulky shopping or holiday gear. For couples or singles who rarely carry rear passengers or big loads the Mokka’s compact advantages outweigh its storage limits, but for parents and those who prioritise cargo versatility the T‑Roc’s packaging is the smarter choice. Both cars offer sensible cabin storage, yet the T‑Roc simply stretches usefulness further for real‑world hauling.

Mokka

Buyer fit — who should choose which, and why

If your life is city‑centric, you value distinctive styling and effortless parking, the Vauxhall Mokka matches that lifestyle and rewards short trips with a relaxed, efficient character. If you regularly carry passengers, do motorway miles or want a cabin that feels a step up in finish, the VW T‑Roc fits better and scales more comfortably with family needs. The trade‑off is clear: pick the Mokka for personality, ease in tight spaces and a fresher design; pick the T‑Roc for composure, interior quality and everyday utility. Use that checklist to frame the deeper technical comparison that follows — drivetrain choices, boot measurements and equipment will confirm which set of compromises you prefer.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

T-Roc

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Vauxhall Mokka is somewhat cheaper – starting at 23,000 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,390 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Vauxhall Mokka uses 4.9 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.6 L/100km.

Mokka

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Vauxhall Mokka offers significantly more power – delivering 281 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 131 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Vauxhall Mokka is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Vauxhall Mokka delivers clearly more torque with 345 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 95 Nm more.

T-Roc

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Vauxhall Mokka is a bit lighter – 1,294 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 171 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW T-Roc offers clearly more boot space – 475 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 125 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries noticeably more – 515 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 115 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Vauxhall Mokka is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,000
Mokka

Vauxhall Mokka

  • Engine Type Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 136 - 281 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 18.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 336 - 403 km
VW T-Roc
Vauxhall Mokka

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

VW T-Roc

The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.

details

Vauxhall Mokka

The Opel Mokka is a compact crossover that blends bold, modern styling with a practical, city-friendly footprint. It delivers a comfortable ride and a well-appointed interior with straightforward tech, making it a smart choice for urban drivers who want a stylish yet sensible small SUV.

details
VW T-Roc
Vauxhall Mokka

Costs and Consumption

Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Price
23,000 - 40,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.4 - 18.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
336 - 403 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
126 - 143 g/km
co2
0 - 129 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Curb weight
1,294 - 1,672 kg
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Trunk capacity
310 - 350 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Width
1,787 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
368 - 515 kg
Payload
388 - 400 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Power HP
136 - 281 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Torque
230 - 345 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Power kW
100 - 207 kW
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
Brand
VW
Brand
Vauxhall
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.