Compare performance (150 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (19,900 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – VW Taigo or Ford Puma?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the bustling world of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and VW Taigo are vying for the attention of car enthusiasts and practical buyers alike. Both models bring their distinctive flair and cutting-edge innovations to the table, making the choice between them a fascinating pursuit. Let's dive into the technical details and innovations that set these vehicles apart.
The Ford Puma offers an impressive range of powertrains, featuring both petrol mild-hybrid electric vehicles (MHEV) and all-electric options. With power outputs ranging from 125 HP to 168 HP, the Puma provides a compelling blend of efficiency and performance. The mild-hybrid option stands out with a consumption rate as low as 5.4 L/100km, and the all-electric variant boasts a range of up to 376 km on a single charge.
Meanwhile, the VW Taigo focuses solely on petrol engines with power outputs from 95 HP to 150 HP. Although it lacks electric variants, the Taigo compensates with a smooth driving experience, and a combined efficiency of around 5.4 L/100km, making it an economically viable choice for stretch-long journeys.
Speed enthusiasts will appreciate the Puma's top speed offerings, maxing out at an impressive 210 km/h for the more powerful variant, while its acceleration capabilities can push it from 0 to 100 km/h in just 7.4 seconds. On the other hand, the Taigo maintains a respectable performance, reaching top speeds of up to 212 km/h and moderate accelerations of 8.2 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h.
Both models share a front-wheel-drive system, ensuring adept handling and maneuverability in urban environments. The Puma aligns with a higher curb weight due to its hybrid and electric configurations, whereas the Taigo offers lighter alternatives for enhanced agility.
When it comes to size, the Ford Puma measures slightly smaller with a width of 1805 mm and an overall length starting at 4186 mm, providing it with a more compact footprint ideal for city driving. The height of 1550 mm complements its SUV stance, while a trunk capacity of up to 523 L ensures enough space for convenience.
The VW Taigo stretches out to a length of 4266 mm, granting it a sleek silhouette, coupled with a narrower width of 1757 mm, which may aid in squeezing through tighter urban lanes. Its trunk space is ample at 440 L, sufficient for day-to-day cargo needs.
In terms of innovations, the Ford Puma leverages its mild-hybrid technology to increase fuel efficiency and reduce emissions, attaining a CO2 rating as low as 0 g/km in its electric variant, aligning with modern eco-conscious automotive trends.
Conversely, the Taigo emphasizes solid engineering with a steadfast focus on traditional petrol efficiency, achieving moderate CO2 outputs around 124-132 g/km. While it doesn't break ground in hybrid technology, its dedication to performance consistency makes it a reliable option for many drivers.
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the VW Taigo boils down to your driving priorities. The Puma excels with a multifaceted powertrain offering including electric variants for the eco-conscious driver. Meanwhile, the Taigo's sturdy petrol engine lineup appeals to those seeking straightforward reliability and efficiency.
Both models stand as excellent choices in the compact SUV category, each presenting unique strengths that cater to a diverse set of preferences among automotive enthusiasts. Consider your driving needs and aspirations when selecting your ideal companion for the road ahead.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
VW Taigo is noticeably cheaper – starting at 19,900 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,994 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the VW Taigo uses 5.3 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers slightly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the VW Taigo takes 8.2 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers somewhat more torque with 290 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, VW Taigo is marginally lighter – 1,229 kg compared to 1,316 kg. The difference is around 87 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries barely more – 469 kg compared to 457 kg. That’s a difference of about 12 kg.
The Ford Puma is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The VW Taigo brings coupe-like flair to the compact crossover scene with sharp styling and an interior that punches above its price, feeling smarter than you’d expect. It’s an easygoing daily companion that balances comfort and practicality with a playful wink, perfect for city drivers who want something livelier than a regular hatchback.
details
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
19,900 - 31,800 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
120 - 132 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,229 - 1,302 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,757 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
448 - 457 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.2 - 11.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
VW
|
Brand
Ford
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España