VS

ZEEKR 001 vs Mazda CX-30 comparison

Compare performance (544 HP vs 186 HP), boot space and price (51,400 £ vs 25,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – ZEEKR 001 or Mazda CX-30?

ZEEKR 001 vs Mazda CX-30: Key differences

ZEEKR 001

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
details

Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • substantially lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

001

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 is substantially cheaper – starting at 25,700 £ , while the ZEEKR 001 costs 51,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 25,715 £.

CX-30

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the ZEEKR 001 offers clearly more power – delivering 544 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 358 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the ZEEKR 001 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 4.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the ZEEKR 001 delivers considerably more torque with 686 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 446 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is substantially lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 2,200 kg. The difference is around 745 kg.

Looking at boot space, the ZEEKR 001 offers markedly more boot space – 539 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 109 L.

When it comes to payload, the ZEEKR 001 carries very slightly more – 520 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 24 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The ZEEKR 001 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £51,400
001

ZEEKR 001

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 272 - 544 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.2 - 18.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 585 - 620 km
details

Frequently compared as well

ZEEKR 001
ZEEKR 7GT
VS
Comparing the Zeekr 001 and the Zeekr 7 GT pits a compact, performance‑leaning electric fastback against a larger, GT‑oriented electric sedan focused on comfort and long‑distance refinement. If you want sharper handling and a sportier image, choose the 001; if you value rear‑seat space, ride …
ZEEKR 001
ZEEKR 7X
VS
The Zeekr 001 is the low-slung, performance-minded EV that hustles through corners with sports-car flair, while the Zeekr 7X swaps that sass for SUV practicality — higher seating, more space and a family-first footprint. If you crave sharp handling and a headline-grabbing design, the 001 is your …
ZEEKR 001
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

ZEEKR 001

The Zeekr 001 feels like a grown-up fastback from the future, blending sleek Scandinavian minimalism with surprising road presence that turns heads without shouting. Inside it's a premium, gadget-filled cocoon that makes electric driving effortless and enjoyable — a polished alternative for buyers who want something refreshingly different.

details
serpimg_gUT1kk

Reviews ZEEKR 001

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends Mazda’s upscale styling with a compact crossover body, offering a refined interior and engaging driving dynamics. It’s a practical choice for buyers who want a premium feel and agile handling in a city-friendly package.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.5 (11 Reviews)
rate
Carlos
18 Jul 2026, 09:40:54

The Mazda is a more elegant car, less cumbersome and, even though it’s also an SUV, it feels less like an SUV and more like a regular car. Besides having an interior that feels more "like a real car" and less "smartphone," the finishes are also superior and the dynamic behavior is better. The lower power is made up for by being about 100 kg lighter, a lower vehicle height (more aerodynamic efficiency), and a smoother drive thanks to a high-displacement, non-turbo engine. The equipment is very similar but the Mazda just has more "class." Prices are comparable with equal equipment, and the difference is size: the Tucson being 11 cm longer is noticeable, especially in the boot — the Mazda’s is fine, but the Tucson’s is cavernous. If you don’t actually need something that big, I recommend the Mazda.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Value for Money
Jarek
4 Jun 2026, 09:16:53

The pleasure of driving and everything we call premium sensations.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Danny
31 May 2026, 17:14:00

Nice luxury car, although I'm not sure I find the oversized rims that attractive. On the other hand, I like the Mazda 3 better.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Paul
27 May 2026, 05:17:55

Better soundproofed, more powerful, and feels more like a continuation of my hands and feet when driving — in other words, you feel like a single unit during the driving experience — but cramped for me at 6 ft 1 in to get in and out…

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Michele
8 May 2026, 17:46:44

Quiet; well finished, predominantly analog dashboard; excellent value for money

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
The Mazda CX-30 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that each aim to combine everyday practicality with a touch of style, but they take different routes on ride feel, interior quality and tech. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the CX-30’s near-premium cabin and engaging …
XPeng G6
ZEEKR 001
VS
In the rapidly evolving electric vehicle market, the XPeng G6 and ZEEKR 001 have emerged as formidable contenders, each offering unique strengths. The XPeng G6 impresses with its advanced autonomous driving capabilities and sleek modern design, catering to tech-savvy drivers. Meanwhile, the ZEEKR …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
ZEEKR 001
Denza Z9GT
VS
ZEEKR 001 and Denza Z9GT go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the ZEEKR 001 or the Denza Z9GT …
Honda HR-V
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Honda HR-V and Mazda CX-30 stand out for their unique appeal and driving dynamics. While the HR-V offers a spacious interior and versatile cargo options, the CX-30 impresses with its upscale cabin and engaging handling. Ultimately, your choice between …
ZEEKR 001
Mazda CX-30

Costs and Consumption
Price
51,400 - 62,600 £
Price
25,700 - 37,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.2 - 18.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
585 - 620 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
129 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Estate
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,200 - 2,350 kg
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Trunk capacity
539 L
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
2,005 mm
Width
1,795 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 520 kg
Payload
458 - 496 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
272 - 544 HP
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 - 7.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
343 - 686 Nm
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
200 - 400 kW
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
ZEEKR
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the ZEEKR 001?

The ZEEKR 001 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.