BMW iX3 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the BMW iX3, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the BMW iX3 and are good next research steps.

from £54,000

Volvo EX60

Price 54,000 - 67,500 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 374 - 680 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range 611 - 810 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 3.9 - 5.9 s
Model Year 2,026 - 2,027
Torque 480 - 790 Nm
Model EX60
Model P6 Electric, P10 Electric, P12 Electric
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Trim Level Plus, Ultra, Plus AWD, Ultra AWD, Plus First Edition AWD, Ultra First Edition AWD
Power kW 275 - 500 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 2,189 - 2,405 kg
Trunk capacity 523 L
Width 1,899 mm
Brand Volvo
Payload 455 - 461 kg
Variant Cross Country

details

Volvo EX60 as a suitable alternative to BMW iX3

The BMW iX3 and Volvo EX60 represent two different takes on the compact electric SUV: BMW focuses on driving dynamics and efficiency, while Volvo emphasizes safety, interior comfort and tech. This short comparison will show where each model shines so you can choose which suits your priorities.

The Volvo EX60 is a stylish electric SUV that pairs Scandinavian minimalism with a high-quality, comfortable cabin and an intuitive infotainment experience. It delivers a composed, refined ride with advanced safety and driver-assist systems that make daily driving relaxed and confident.

Quick data check: Volvo EX60

very slightly cheaper
clearly more power
very slightly more electric range
noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
very slightly lighter

Compare directly with Volvo EX60

from £54,400

Audi Q6 e-tron

Price 54,400 - 82,500 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 252 - 490 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range 535 - 668 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 4.4 - 7.6 s
Model Year 2,024 - 2,025
Torque 450 - 855 Nm
Model Q6 e-tron
Model Q6 e-tron, Q6 e-tron performance, SQ6 e-tron, Q6 Sportback e-tron, Q6 Sportback e-tron performance, SQ6 Sportback e-tron
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Trim Level quattro, S line business, S line business quattro
Power kW 185 - 360 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 2,200 - 2,425 kg
Trunk capacity 499 - 526 L
Width 1,939 - 1,965 mm
Brand Audi
Payload 540 kg
Variant Sportback

details

Audi Q6 e-tron as a suitable alternative to BMW iX3

The Audi Q6 e-tron and BMW iX3 represent two different takes on the premium electric SUV: the Q6 e-tron focuses on advanced tech and long-range efficiency, while the iX3 emphasizes BMW’s driving dynamics and familiar refinement. Below I’ll compare their range, performance, interior quality and running costs to help you decide which one fits your needs.

The Audi Q6 e-tron combines Audi's premium design and refined interior with a modern electric drivetrain that delivers effortless, quiet acceleration. It feels spacious and tech-forward, making it a comfortable and confident choice for buyers who want an upscale electric SUV for daily driving and longer trips.

Quick data check: Audi Q6 e-tron

very slightly more power
slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
marginally lighter

Compare directly with Audi Q6 e-tron

from £43,700

BMW iX2

Price 43,700 - 55,600 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 204 - 313 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 14.4 - 15.4 kWh/100km
Electric Range 476 - 512 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.6 - 8.6 s
Model Year 2026
Torque 250 - 494 Nm
Model iX2
Model iX2 eDrive20, iX2 xDrive30
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Trim Level M Sportpaket, M Sportpaket Pro
Power kW 150 - 230 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 1,960 - 2,095 kg
Trunk capacity 525 L
Width 1,845 mm
Brand BMW
Payload 500 - 510 kg

details

BMW iX2 as a suitable alternative to BMW iX3

The BMW iX2 and BMW iX3 go head-to-head in the compact electric-SUV ring, one flirting with city sportiness while the other favours long-distance composure. Pick the iX2 for cheeky handling and urban style, or the iX3 when range, space and relaxed motorway manners matter — either way, you get that unmistakable BMW polish.

The BMW iX2 cuts a sporty silhouette and delivers the buttoned-up premium feel you expect from the brand, wrapped in a compact electric package that’s easy to live with. It’s a smart pick for buyers who want engaging city driving, clever cabin tech and a touch of eco-conscious flair without giving up the fun behind the wheel.

Quick data check: BMW iX2

clearly cheaper
very slightly more efficient
visibly lighter

Compare directly with BMW iX2

from £53,100

Polestar 4

Price 53,100 - 59,900 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 272 - 544 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 17.8 - 19 kWh/100km
Electric Range 590 - 620 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 3.8 - 7.1 s
Model Year 2026
Torque 343 - 686 Nm
Model 4
Model 4 Coupé Rear Motor, 4 Coupé Dual Motor
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Power kW 200 - 400 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 2,230 - 2,355 kg
Trunk capacity 526 L
Width 2,008 mm
Brand Polestar
Payload 455 kg
Variant Coupé

details

Polestar 4 as a suitable alternative to BMW iX3

The BMW iX3 and Polestar 4 are both premium electric SUVs but take very different approaches—BMW favors refined, familiar SUV comfort while Polestar pushes a sportier, design-forward experience. This comparison will focus on range, performance, interior quality and everyday practicality to help you decide which suits your priorities best.

The Polestar 4 wears a coupe-like profile and a Scandinavian-minimal interior that feels premium and unexpectedly roomy, with composed handling that makes urban driving and country roads a pleasure. For buyers who want an electric car that turns heads without shouting, the Polestar 4 is a stylish, clever choice that balances practicality with personality.

Quick data check: Polestar 4

marginally cheaper
a bit more power
markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
barely lighter

Compare directly with Polestar 4

from £43,200

Mercedes GLB

Price 43,200 - 62,400 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric, Full Hybrid
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 156 - 354 HP
Consumption L/100km 5.7 - 6.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range 431 - 631 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.5 - 9.7 s
Model Year 2026
Torque 280 - 515 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model GLB
Model GLB 250+ EQ, GLB 350 EQ, GLB 180, GLB 200, GLB 220, GLB 200 EQ
CO2 Efficiency Class A, D, E
Trim Level Progressive, AMG Line, AMG Line Plus, Night Edition, Progressive 4MATIC, AMG Line 4MATIC, AMG Line Plus 4MATIC, Night Edition 4MATIC
Power kW 115 - 260 kW
co2 0 - 138 g/km
Engine capacity 1,499 cm3
Curb weight 1,840 - 2,280 kg
Trunk capacity 540 L
Width 1,861 mm
Brand Mercedes-Benz
Payload 485 - 505 kg

details

Mercedes GLB as a suitable alternative to BMW iX3

The BMW iX3 and Mercedes GLB go head-to-head as two very different takes on the premium compact SUV: the iX3 is BMW’s electric, efficiency-focused offering while the GLB is Mercedes’ practical, multi‑seat family SUV. This comparison will help you weigh the iX3’s EV range, refinement and tech against the GLB’s space, versatility and combustion-engine driving character so you can pick the one that fits your needs.

The Mercedes GLB is a compact luxury SUV that blends smart packaging with a polished, composed driving experience. Its flexible interior and premium feel make it a sensible pick for buyers who want Mercedes comfort and practicality in a smaller footprint.

Quick data check: Mercedes GLB

visibly cheaper
visibly lighter

Compare directly with Mercedes GLB

from £40,700

Audi Q4 e-tron

Price 40,700 - 53,100 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 204 - 340 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range 440 - 592 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.4 - 8.1 s
Model Year 2026
Torque 350 - 679 Nm
Model Q4 e-tron
Model Q4 e-tron, Q4 e-tron performance, Q4 Sportback e-tron, Q4 Sportback e-tron performance
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Trim Level quattro
Power kW 150 - 250 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 2,035 - 2,235 kg
Trunk capacity 515 - 535 L
Width 1,865 mm
Brand Audi
Payload 505 - 515 kg
Variant Sportback

details

Audi Q4 e-tron as a suitable alternative to BMW iX3

The Audi Q4 e‑tron feels like the sensible, tech‑savvy choice — airy cabin, clever packaging and a polished, Scandinavian calm that suits family life and long commutes. The BMW iX3, by contrast, plays the sporty, driver‑centric card with taut handling and BMW polish, so pick the Q4 for everyday practicality and the iX3 if you want a bit more driving fun and badge prestige.

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

Quick data check: Audi Q4 e-tron

markedly cheaper
somewhat lighter

Compare directly with Audi Q4 e-tron

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the BMW iX3 head-to-head against similar models.

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.