Skoda Kodiaq alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Skoda Kodiaq, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Skoda Kodiaq

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Skoda Kodiaq and are good next research steps.

from £40,200
Tayron

VW Tayron

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range 116 - 123 km

VW Tayron as a suitable alternative to Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq and VW Tayron are closely related midsize SUVs that focus on practicality and solid build quality, but they appeal to slightly different tastes and priorities. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the Kodiaq’s family-friendly versatility or the Tayron’s more Volkswagen-like refinement and driving character suits you better.

The VW Tayron combines a roomy, practical interior with a composed, comfortable ride that suits both daily commuting and longer journeys. With a restrained, modern design and a focus on straightforward tech and safety, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want Volkswagen refinement without unnecessary flash.

Quick data check: VW Tayron

  • very slightly cheaper
  • only slightly more trunk space
  • barely more power
  • very slightly more electric range
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
from £38,600
MGS9

MG MGS9

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 299 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.4 L/100km
  • Electric Range 100 km

MG MGS9 as a suitable alternative to Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq and the MG MGS9 are both family-sized SUVs that prioritise space and practicality, but they offer contrasting strengths — the Kodiaq leans on refinement and proven engineering, while the MGS9 trades on value and a feature-rich kit. This comparison focuses on interior space, driving dynamics, equipment, ownership costs and overall suitability to help you pick the better fit.

The MG MGS9 presents itself as a stylish, value-focused flagship SUV with a roomy, well-equipped cabin and contemporary infotainment. It balances a comfortable ride with engaging handling, making it a compelling choice for buyers seeking a feature-rich alternative to established rivals.

Quick data check: MG MGS9

  • barely cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • somewhat more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
  • significantly more trunk space
  • a bit more power
from £58,300
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 335 - 406 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 79 km

Volvo XC60 as a suitable alternative to Skoda Kodiaq

If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and sensible running costs, pick the XC60 if you want premium materials, advanced safety and a badge that makes the neighbours nod — your budget will make the final call.

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian elegance with a strong focus on occupant safety, delivering a calm, composed ride and a well-crafted, user-friendly cabin. It’s a practical yet premium compact SUV that balances comfort with confident road manners, ideal for buyers who value refinement and everyday usability.

Quick data check: Volvo XC60

  • significantly cheaper
  • only slightly more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • visibly lighter
  • markedly more power
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
from £36,100
Superb Combi

Skoda Superb Combi

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.2 - 7.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range 128 - 137 km

Skoda Superb Combi as a suitable alternative to Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Superb Combi is a roomy, practical estate that focuses on comfort and massive luggage space, while the Skoda Kodiaq is a taller, more versatile SUV that suits families needing optional seven-seat flexibility and a higher driving position. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise low-slung handling and maximum boot capacity (Superb Combi) or a commanding view, extra seating and light off-road capability (Kodiaq).

The Skoda Superb Combi is the practical hero of the estate world, offering cavernous space and a calm, refined ride that makes family life feel effortless. Its clever features, understated design and no-nonsense value make it a smart pick for buyers who want Germanic engineering without the badge premium — and it even manages to stay surprisingly stylish while doing all the heavy lifting.

Quick data check: Skoda Superb Combi

  • markedly more trunk space
  • barely cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • slightly more electric range
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km

Skoda Enyaq as a suitable alternative to Skoda Kodiaq

Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Kodiaq target very different buyers: the Enyaq is an all-electric SUV focused on efficiency, modern tech and city-friendly driving, while the Kodiaq is a larger, traditional family SUV offering seven seats, greater towing and cargo capacity. This quick comparison highlights the Enyaq’s electric range and lower running costs versus the Kodiaq’s space, versatility and long-distance convenience so you can decide which fits your lifestyle.

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

Quick data check: Skoda Enyaq

  • noticeably lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
  • marginally cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
from £36,000
Touran

VW Touran

  • Engine Type Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 122 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.2 - 6.5 L/100km

VW Touran as a suitable alternative to Skoda Kodiaq

If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with nimbler handling, lower running costs and easier parking, so pick the Kodiaq for space and holiday miles and the Touran for urban practicality and economy.

The VW Touran is a sensible family people‑carrier that mixes practical packaging with tidy, German-built refinement, making everyday life with kids and shopping feel a lot less chaotic. If you want a reliable, no-nonsense companion that drives with surprising poise and values usefulness over flash, the Touran is a very persuasive choice.

Quick data check: VW Touran

  • substantially more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space
  • marginally cheaper
  • slightly lighter
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.