Skoda Kodiaq alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Skoda Kodiaq, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

scroll down

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Skoda Kodiaq and are good next research steps.

from £40,200

VW Tayron

Price 40,200 - 56,000 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 150 - 272 HP
Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.5 L/100km
Electric Range 116 - 123 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.1 - 9.7 s
Model Year 2,025 - 2,026
Torque 250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model Tayron
Modell Tayron 1.5 eTSI, Tayron 2.0 TDI SCR, Tayron 2.0 TSI OPF, Tayron 1.5 eHybrid OPF
CO2 Efficiency Class E, F, B, G
Trim Level Life DSG, Life 4MOTION DSG, R-Line 4MOTION DSG, Elegance DSG, Elegance 4MOTION DSG, R-Line DSG, R-Line 195 4MOTION DSG
Power kW 110 - 200 kW
co2 33 - 192 g/km
Engine capacity 1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Curb weight 1,682 - 1,948 kg
Trunk capacity 705 - 885 L
Width 1,853 - 1,866 mm
Brand VW
Payload 497 - 573 kg

details

VW Tayron as a suitable alternative to Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq and VW Tayron are closely related midsize SUVs that focus on practicality and solid build quality, but they appeal to slightly different tastes and priorities. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the Kodiaq’s family-friendly versatility or the Tayron’s more Volkswagen-like refinement and driving character suits you better.

The VW Tayron combines a roomy, practical interior with a composed, comfortable ride that suits both daily commuting and longer journeys. With a restrained, modern design and a focus on straightforward tech and safety, it’s a sensible choice for buyers who want Volkswagen refinement without unnecessary flash.

Quick data check: VW Tayron

very slightly cheaper
only slightly more trunk space
barely more power
very slightly more electric range
very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
marginally lighter

Compare directly with VW Tayron

from £42,800

Mitsubishi Outlander

Price 42,800 - 54,600 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 306 HP
Consumption L/100km 2.6 - 2.7 L/100km
Electric Range 83 - 85 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.9 s
Model Year 2,025 - 2,026
Number of Cylinders 4
Model Outlander
Modell Outlander 2.4 Plug-In Hybrid
CO2 Efficiency Class B
Trim Level Diamant 4WD, Diamant Plus 4WD, Select 4WD, Diamant Top 4WD, Diamant Top mit Luxury-Paket 4WD, Black 4WD
Power kW 225 kW
co2 60 g/km
Engine capacity 2,360 cm3
Curb weight 2,156 - 2,232 kg
Trunk capacity 498 L
Width 1,862 mm
Brand Mitsubishi
Payload 453 - 529 kg

details

Mitsubishi Outlander as a suitable alternative to Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq and the Mitsubishi Outlander both aim at buyers needing a practical, family-friendly SUV, but they take different approaches—Kodiaq prioritizes space and refinement, while Outlander leans on value and versatility. This comparison highlights the strengths and trade-offs so you can choose the one that best fits your driving needs and ownership priorities.

The Mitsubishi Outlander is a sensible family SUV that blends roomy practicality with a calm, assured ride—ideal for school runs and weekend getaways. It won’t set pulses racing, but its tidy interior, straightforward equipment and low-stress ownership make it a smart, unfussy pick for buyers who prefer reliability over flash.

Quick data check: Mitsubishi Outlander

moderately cheaper
considerably more efficient
markedly more electric range
markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
visibly lighter
considerably more trunk space
moderately more power

Compare directly with Mitsubishi Outlander

from £36,000

VW Touran

Price 36,000 - 45,300 £
Body Type MPV
Engine Type Petrol, Diesel
Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 122 - 150 HP
Consumption L/100km 5.2 - 6.5 L/100km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.9 - 10.8 s
Model Year 2,024 - 2,025
Torque 250 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model Touran
Modell Touran 1.5 TSI OPF ACT, Touran 2.0 TDI SCR
CO2 Efficiency Class E
Trim Level Comfortline, Comfortline DSG (7-Gang), ENERGY, ENERGY DSG (7-Gang), Highline, Highline DSG (7-Gang)
Power kW 90 - 110 kW
co2 136 - 149 g/km
Engine capacity 1,498 - 1,968 cm3
Curb weight 1,520 - 1,631 kg
Trunk capacity 834 L
Width 1,829 mm
Brand VW
Payload 590 - 601 kg

details

VW Touran as a suitable alternative to Skoda Kodiaq

If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with nimbler handling, lower running costs and easier parking, so pick the Kodiaq for space and holiday miles and the Touran for urban practicality and economy.

The VW Touran is a sensible family people‑carrier that mixes practical packaging with tidy, German-built refinement, making everyday life with kids and shopping feel a lot less chaotic. If you want a reliable, no-nonsense companion that drives with surprising poise and values usefulness over flash, the Touran is a very persuasive choice.

Quick data check: VW Touran

substantially more power
considerably more efficient
significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
marginally more trunk space
marginally cheaper
slightly lighter

Compare directly with VW Touran

from £36,100

Skoda Superb Combi

Price 36,100 - 52,300 £
Body Type Estate
Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 150 - 265 HP
Consumption L/100km 1.2 - 7.8 L/100km
Electric Range 128 - 137 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.7 - 9.3 s
Model Year 2,024 - 2,025
Torque 250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model Superb
Modell Superb Combi 2.0 TSI, Superb Combi 1.5 TSI mHEV, Superb Combi 2.0 TDI SCR, Superb Combi iV 1.5 TSI PHEV
CO2 Efficiency Class E, F, D, G, B
Trim Level Selection DSG, L&K DSG, Sportline DSG, Essence DSG, Selection 4x4 DSG, L&K 4x4 DSG, Sportline 4x4 DSG, Essence 4x4 DSG
Power kW 110 - 195 kW
co2 28 - 178 g/km
Engine capacity 1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Curb weight 1,575 - 1,853 kg
Trunk capacity 510 - 690 L
Width 1,849 mm
Brand Skoda
Payload 497 - 584 kg
Variant Combi

details

Skoda Superb Combi as a suitable alternative to Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Superb Combi is a roomy, practical estate that focuses on comfort and massive luggage space, while the Skoda Kodiaq is a taller, more versatile SUV that suits families needing optional seven-seat flexibility and a higher driving position. Choosing between them comes down to whether you prioritise low-slung handling and maximum boot capacity (Superb Combi) or a commanding view, extra seating and light off-road capability (Kodiaq).

The Skoda Superb Combi is the practical hero of the estate world, offering cavernous space and a calm, refined ride that makes family life feel effortless. Its clever features, understated design and no-nonsense value make it a smart pick for buyers who want Germanic engineering without the badge premium — and it even manages to stay surprisingly stylish while doing all the heavy lifting.

Quick data check: Skoda Superb Combi

markedly more trunk space
barely cheaper
visibly more efficient
slightly more electric range
slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
only slightly lighter

Compare directly with Skoda Superb Combi

from £31,300

Hyundai Tucson

Price 31,300 - 48,800 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 136 - 288 HP
Consumption L/100km 2.7 - 7.6 L/100km
Electric Range 63 - 70 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.5 - 11.6 s
Model Year 2025
Torque 250 - 379 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4
Model Tucson
Modell Tucson 1.6 T-GDI, Tucson 1.6 T-GDI HEV, Tucson 1.6 T-GDI PHEV, Tucson 1.6 CRDi 48V-Mildhybrid
CO2 Efficiency Class F, D, E, B
Trim Level Select, Select DCT, Trend DCT, N Line DCT, N Line X DCT, Prime DCT, N Line Allrad DCT, N Line X Allrad DCT, Prime Allrad DCT, Select Automatik, Trend Automatik, N Line Automatik, N Line Allrad Automatik, N Line X Automatik, N Line X Allrad Automatik, Prime Automatik, Prime Allrad Automatik
Power kW 100 - 212 kW
co2 62 - 172 g/km
Engine capacity 1,598 cm3
Curb weight 1,542 - 1,893 kg
Trunk capacity 546 - 620 L
Width 1,865 mm
Brand Hyundai
Payload 518 - 545 kg

details

Hyundai Tucson as a suitable alternative to Skoda Kodiaq

The Hyundai Tucson and Skoda Kodiaq pit a stylish, tech-packed compact crossover against a larger, family-focused SUV with up to seven seats. I’ll compare space, comfort, driving character and running costs so you can decide which suits your needs.

The Hyundai Tucson is a well-rounded compact SUV that blends modern styling with a comfortable, thoughtfully laid-out interior, making it appealing for daily driving and family use. It delivers a calm ride, a generous level of equipment for the price, and sensible practicality, so it's a smart choice if you want a straightforward, dependable crossover without fuss.

Quick data check: Hyundai Tucson

clearly more efficient
substantially more electric range
slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
clearly more trunk space
visibly cheaper
barely more power
barely lighter

Compare directly with Hyundai Tucson

from £36,800

Skoda Enyaq

Price 36,800 - 52,800 £
Body Type SUV
Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 190 - 340 HP
Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range 449 - 589 km
Seats 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h 5.4 - 8.6 s
Model Year 2026
Torque 350 - 679 Nm
Model Enyaq
Modell Enyaq 60, Enyaq 85, Enyaq 85x, Enyaq Coupé 60, Enyaq Coupé 85, Enyaq Coupé 85x, Enyaq RS, Enyaq Coupé RS
CO2 Efficiency Class A
Trim Level Essence, Selection, Sportline
Power kW 140 - 250 kW
co2 0 g/km
Curb weight 2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity 570 - 585 L
Width 1,879 mm
Brand Skoda
Payload 449 - 526 kg
Variant Coupé, RS, RS Coupé

details

Skoda Enyaq as a suitable alternative to Skoda Kodiaq

Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Kodiaq target very different buyers: the Enyaq is an all-electric SUV focused on efficiency, modern tech and city-friendly driving, while the Kodiaq is a larger, traditional family SUV offering seven seats, greater towing and cargo capacity. This quick comparison highlights the Enyaq’s electric range and lower running costs versus the Kodiaq’s space, versatility and long-distance convenience so you can decide which fits your lifestyle.

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

Quick data check: Skoda Enyaq

noticeably lighter
markedly more trunk space
marginally cheaper
markedly more power
significantly more electric range
moderately quicker 0–100 km/h

Compare directly with Skoda Enyaq

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Skoda Kodiaq head-to-head against similar models.

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.