Tesla Model 3 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Tesla Model 3, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Tesla Model 3

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Tesla Model 3 and are good next research steps.

from £23,900
B05

Leapmotor B05

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 401 - 482 km

Leapmotor B05 as a suitable alternative to Tesla Model 3

The Tesla Model 3 and the Leapmotor B05 take very different approaches to the compact electric sedan market: the Model 3 emphasizes driving dynamics, long range and an advanced tech ecosystem, while the B05 targets affordability and efficient urban use with strong value for money. This comparison will pinpoint where each car shines—performance, battery and charging, interior comfort and features—so you can choose the one that best fits your priorities.

The Leapmotor B05 is a family-oriented electric compact that prioritizes interior space and everyday practicality, with flexible seating and a clean, modern cabin layout. It's tuned for comfortable, easy driving around town and brings a tech-forward experience that appeals to buyers looking for a straightforward, user-friendly EV.

Quick data check: Leapmotor B05

  • markedly cheaper
  • barely lighter
from £41,100
7GT

ZEEKR 7GT

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 421 - 646 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 - 19.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 519 - 655 km

ZEEKR 7GT as a suitable alternative to Tesla Model 3

The Tesla Model 3 and Zeekr 7GT take very different approaches to modern EV ownership: the Model 3 is a compact, performance‑leaning sedan known for brisk acceleration, precise handling and Tesla’s ecosystem, while the Zeekr 7GT emphasizes a roomier, more comfort‑oriented experience with premium touches. Choosing between them comes down to priorities — if you value sporty driving, charging convenience and proven software updates go Model 3; if you need space, comfort and a more luxurious cabin, the Zeekr 7GT is the better fit.

The Zeekr 7 GT stakes its claim as a smartly styled, quietly confident grand tourer that mixes comfort with a sporty edge to keep daily drives interesting. Inside it feels more grown-up EV than gadget toy, offering a polished cabin and driver-focused flair that will appeal to buyers who want presence without pretension.

Quick data check: ZEEKR 7GT

  • visibly more power
from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 458 - 607 km

Toyota C-HR+ as a suitable alternative to Tesla Model 3

Choosing between the Tesla Model 3 and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to whether you prefer an efficient, high-tech electric sedan or a compact, style-focused crossover. The Model 3 stands out for electric range, sharp performance and advanced driver-assist features, while the Toyota C‑HR (commonly called the C‑HR) offers lower running costs, practical urban packaging and Toyota’s strong reliability.

The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.

Quick data check: Toyota C-HR+

  • very slightly lighter
from £40,200
EV3

Kia EV3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 265 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 572 km

Kia EV3 as a suitable alternative to Tesla Model 3

The Kia EV3 arrives as a clever, value-packed challenger, promising space and sensible electric range, while the Tesla Model 3 still stands as the tech-forward benchmark for driving dynamics and Autopilot. This head-to-head pits practicality against polish to help you decide which makes more sense for daily driving, charging habits and real-world ownership.

The Kia EV3 is a stylish, user-friendly electric crossover that focuses on practicality and a roomy, well-equipped cabin. It delivers a comfortable ride with intuitive technology and efficient everyday performance, making it a sensible choice for city and family use.

from £54,000
EX60

Volvo EX60

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 374 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 611 - 810 km

Quick data check: Volvo EX60

  • markedly more power
  • barely more electric range
from £34,200
Explorer EV

Ford Explorer EV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 17.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 417 - 602 km

Ford Explorer EV as a suitable alternative to Tesla Model 3

Comparing the Ford Explorer EV and the Tesla Model 3 puts a large, family‑focused electric SUV against a compact, driver‑oriented electric sedan. The Explorer EV is aimed at buyers who need space and versatility, while the Model 3 favors efficiency, sharper dynamics and Tesla’s mature software/charging ecosystem. Quick takeaway - Pick the Explorer EV if you want a roomy, practical three‑row SUV (or a large two‑row with lots of cargo), higher towing and a more conventional, family‑friendly layout. - Pick the Model 3 if you want a more affordable, efficient and sporty electric sedan with superior charging network access, lower running costs and strong tech/performance for its price. Head‑to‑head Size & practicality - Explorer EV: Positioned as a full‑size or near‑full‑size electric SUV — emphasis on passenger space (three rows likely), flexible seating, and larger cargo capacity. Better for families, car seats and hauling people or gear. - Model 3: Compact/near‑midsize sedan — comfortable for five adults but no third row; trunk and frunk add useful luggage space but overall cargo volume is clearly less than an SUV. Range & charging - Explorer EV: Expect a competitive range for its size but typically lower than a compact sedan’s EPA numbers. Charging speeds will be decent but may lag the peak rates of Tesla’s newest cars and depend on Ford’s charging partnerships. - Model 3: Strong efficiency and range for its class. Excellent access to Tesla Supercharger network and high real‑world charging speeds, which translate to easier long‑distance travel and shorter charging stops. Performance & driving experience - Explorer EV: Tuned for comfort and stability; heavier, higher center of gravity than a sedan. Acceleration is brisk in higher trims but overall handling favors composed, comfortable driving over sporty agility. - Model 3: Known for sharp steering, quick acceleration (especially Dual‑Motor and Performance trims) and a low center of gravity that delivers engaging handling and better overall efficiency. Interior & technology - Explorer EV: Likely a more traditional interior with established controls, larger physical switches and family‑friendly ergonomics. Ford’s SYNC infotainment is feature‑rich and improving. - Model 3: Minimalist cabin with a big central touchscreen controlling most functions. Tesla’s software, frequent OTA updates, integrated navigation with Supercharger routing, and active feature rollout are major pluses — though the minimal layout isn’t everyone’s taste. Driver assistance & safety - Explorer EV: Expected to offer advanced ADAS features and strong safety equipment; Ford’s Co‑Pilot360 suite (or its successor) provides many active safety systems. Actual capability and refinement depend on trim and optional packages. - Model 3: Strong safety record and mature Autopilot suite; FSD is optional and controversial but regular software improvements keep adding features. Tesla’s driver assist is among the most visible in the market. Cost & value - Explorer EV: Likely to be pricier than a Model 3 when comparing similarly equipped vehicles, especially for larger battery/trim levels; total cost of ownership depends on trim, incentives, and real world efficiency. - Model 3: Generally offers strong value for a performance/tech package in its price band. Lower energy consumption and access to Superchargers (depending on policy) can reduce long‑term charging costs. Practical ownership notes - Explorer EV: Better choice if you regularly carry lots of people, need towing capability, or prefer an SUV driving position. Charging infrastructure compatibility will depend on Ford’s partnered networks and adapters. - Model 3: Better for commuting, single‑family use, or buyers who prioritize driving dynamics and fast, widely available charging. Tesla’s software ecosystem tends to simplify long‑term updates and remote diagnostics. Who each is best for - Choose the Explorer EV if: you need third‑row seating or significantly more interior/cargo space, you tow occasionally, or you prefer a traditional SUV layout for family life. - Choose the Model 3 if: you want a more efficient, sportier drive, lower running costs, faster access to charging infrastructure, and the benefits of Tesla’s software/OTA culture. Bottom line If daily practicality and passenger hauling are your priority, the Explorer EV will likely be the better fit. If efficiency, charging convenience, sharper driving dynamics and a lower purchase price (in many trims) matter most, the Model 3 is the smarter, more driver‑focused choice.

The Explorer EV brings the familiar presence and practicality of an Explorer into the electric age, offering roomy comfort and modern tech for everyday life and family trips. It feels composed on the road and serves as a straightforward, user-friendly alternative to conventional gas-powered SUVs.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.