Tesla Model 3 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Tesla Model 3, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Tesla Model 3

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Tesla Model 3 and are good next research steps.

from £23,900
B05

Leapmotor B05

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 218 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 401 - 482 km

Leapmotor B05 as a suitable alternative to Tesla Model 3

The Tesla Model 3 and the Leapmotor B05 take very different approaches to the compact electric sedan market: the Model 3 emphasizes driving dynamics, long range and an advanced tech ecosystem, while the B05 targets affordability and efficient urban use with strong value for money. This comparison will pinpoint where each car shines—performance, battery and charging, interior comfort and features—so you can choose the one that best fits your priorities.

The Leapmotor B05 is a family-oriented electric compact that prioritizes interior space and everyday practicality, with flexible seating and a clean, modern cabin layout. It's tuned for comfortable, easy driving around town and brings a tech-forward experience that appeals to buyers looking for a straightforward, user-friendly EV.

Quick data check: Leapmotor B05

  • clearly more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • visibly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • substantially more trunk space
  • markedly cheaper
  • barely lighter
from £41,100
7GT

ZEEKR 7GT

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 421 - 646 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 - 19.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 519 - 655 km

ZEEKR 7GT as a suitable alternative to Tesla Model 3

The Tesla Model 3 and Zeekr 7GT take very different approaches to modern EV ownership: the Model 3 is a compact, performance‑leaning sedan known for brisk acceleration, precise handling and Tesla’s ecosystem, while the Zeekr 7GT emphasizes a roomier, more comfort‑oriented experience with premium touches. Choosing between them comes down to priorities — if you value sporty driving, charging convenience and proven software updates go Model 3; if you need space, comfort and a more luxurious cabin, the Zeekr 7GT is the better fit.

The Zeekr 7 GT stakes its claim as a smartly styled, quietly confident grand tourer that mixes comfort with a sporty edge to keep daily drives interesting. Inside it feels more grown-up EV than gadget toy, offering a polished cabin and driver-focused flair that will appeal to buyers who want presence without pretension.

Quick data check: ZEEKR 7GT

  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
  • visibly more power
from £31,700
Uncharted

Subaru Uncharted

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.7 - 15.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 451 - 592 km

Subaru Uncharted as a suitable alternative to Tesla Model 3

Facing the Tesla Model 3 against the Subaru Uncharted highlights two different philosophies: the Model 3 prioritizes electric range, brisk acceleration and a tech‑focused cabin, while the Uncharted emphasizes Subaru’s familiar mix of practicality, ruggedness and all‑weather capability. This short comparison will help you decide whether you value EV performance and minimalist tech or conventional versatility and everyday usability.

The Subaru Uncharted is a compact electric crossover that feels at home in the city, with easy steering and Subaru’s traction helpers giving it more off‑road composure than its size suggests. It’s practical and simple to use for daily life with convenient charging, but the rear seat is snug, rear visibility suffers without a wiper, and the all‑wheel‑drive version can be thirstier on long motorway runs.

Quick data check: Subaru Uncharted

  • clearly more power
  • very slightly more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km

Skoda Enyaq as a suitable alternative to Tesla Model 3

Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Tesla Model 3 is essentially a choice between roomy, practical European design and a tech-focused, performance-oriented EV experience. This comparison cuts through range, charging, interior space, driving dynamics and running costs to help you decide which suits your needs.

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

Quick data check: Skoda Enyaq

  • slightly cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • visibly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space
from £22,200
Raval

CUPRA Raval

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 226 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.6 - 16.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 300 - 445 km

Quick data check: CUPRA Raval

  • considerably more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
  • considerably cheaper
  • somewhat lighter
from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 458 - 607 km

Quick data check: Toyota C-HR+

  • a bit cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • very slightly more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
  • very slightly lighter
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.