Toyota C-HR+ alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Toyota C-HR+, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Toyota C-HR+

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Toyota C-HR+ and are good next research steps.

from £40,200
EV3

Kia EV3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 265 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.8 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 572 km

Kia EV3 as a suitable alternative to Toyota C-HR+

The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy electric drive and lower running costs; stick with the C‑HR+ if you crave standout looks, proven reliability and the comforting predictability of traditional powertrains.

The Kia EV3 is a stylish, user-friendly electric crossover that focuses on practicality and a roomy, well-equipped cabin. It delivers a comfortable ride with intuitive technology and efficient everyday performance, making it a sensible choice for city and family use.

Quick data check: Kia EV3

  • somewhat cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • noticeably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
from £36,800
bZ4X

Toyota bZ4X

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 167 - 380 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13.5 - 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 444 - 591 km

Toyota bZ4X as a suitable alternative to Toyota C-HR+

This comparison looks at the Toyota bZ4X versus the Toyota C‑HR: both are compact crossovers but take very different approaches — the bZ4X is a purpose‑built all‑electric SUV while the C‑HR is Toyota’s stylish, efficient petrol/hybrid crossover. I’ll run through the key differences in driving range and performance, interior space and practicality, equipment and running costs so you can decide which fits your needs.

The Toyota bZ4X is an electric crossover that focuses on a calm ride, practical interior and predictable handling for everyday driving. It suits buyers who want an easygoing, reliable EV with Toyota's familiar build quality and a clean, simple design.

Quick data check: Toyota bZ4X

  • very slightly cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • only slightly more electric range
  • marginally lighter
  • marginally more power
  • somewhat quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
from £32,000
Elroq

Skoda Elroq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.1 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 441 - 574 km

Skoda Elroq as a suitable alternative to Toyota C-HR+

Choosing between the Skoda Elroq and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to practicality versus personality in the compact crossover class. The Elroq emphasises roomy, clever packaging and value, while the C‑HR focuses on bold styling and efficient drivetrains—pick the Elroq for everyday versatility or the C‑HR for standout looks and economical running costs.

The Skoda Elroq is a practical and well-rounded compact SUV that blends clever packaging with a calm, comfortable ride. It offers a sensible interior, straightforward technology and a value-focused approach, making it a particularly good choice for families and everyday drivers.

Quick data check: Skoda Elroq

  • very slightly more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
  • slightly cheaper
  • slightly more trunk space
from £29,100
C-HR

Toyota C-HR

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 223 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 66 km

Toyota C-HR as a suitable alternative to Toyota C-HR+

Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches your budget and daily driving needs.

The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.

Quick data check: Toyota C-HR

  • noticeably more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
  • very slightly more trunk space
from £42,800
Tavascan

CUPRA Tavascan

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 17.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 441 - 557 km

CUPRA Tavascan as a suitable alternative to Toyota C-HR+

The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or the pragmatic, wallet-friendly C-HR+ — we pit them head-to-head on performance, practicality and value.

The Cupra Tavascan blends athletic styling with a premium, driver-focused cabin, giving the electric crossover a distinctly sporty character. It feels poised and engaging on the road while standing out with bold design cues and a modern, high-quality finish.

Quick data check: CUPRA Tavascan

  • slightly cheaper
  • very slightly more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
  • visibly more trunk space
from £48,900
RZ

Lexus RZ

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 227 - 408 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.7 - 18.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 457 - 559 km

Lexus RZ as a suitable alternative to Toyota C-HR+

The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication or clever economy with a personality?

The Lexus RZ brings Lexus' trademark quiet luxury to the electric SUV world, wrapping poised handling and a plush, well-crafted cabin in a calm, composed package. It won't shout about raw figures — instead it trades headline numbers for smooth power delivery, fuss-free tech and an effortless refinement that will suit buyers who want electric convenience without losing the luxury experience.

Quick data check: Lexus RZ

  • visibly cheaper
  • marginally more efficient
  • marginally more electric range
  • slightly lighter
  • slightly more power
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.