VS

BMW iX1 vs Toyota C-HR+ comparison

Compare performance (313 HP vs 343 HP), boot space and price (42,300 £ vs 36,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – BMW iX1 or Toyota C-HR+?

BMW iX1 vs Toyota C-HR+: Key differences

BMW iX1

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more trunk space
details

Toyota C-HR+

  • moderately cheaper
  • marginally more power
  • only slightly more efficient
  • slightly more electric range
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

iX1

BMW iX1 VS Toyota C-HR+: an executive summary for buyers

The BMW iX1 and Toyota C‑HR+ make very different promises in the compact crossover field: the iX1 leans into a premium, full‑electric ownership experience while the C‑HR+ angles for efficiency, bold design and hybrid practicality. That difference shapes everything buyers feel day to day — from how the cabin materials land under your hand to how the car behaves on a motorway run or a tight city street. The iX1 trades a firmer ride and a more expensive price tag for a quieter, more composed long‑distance companion and a very usable boot. The C‑HR+ trades some rear seat and luggage flexibility for lower running costs in urban use and simpler, more traditional controls. Below we unpack cabin, comfort, practicality, city manners and who each car will suit best before moving into the technical details.

C-HR+

Cabin feel and perceived quality

The BMW iX1 feels like it belongs in a higher tier: materials, panel fit and overall tactile quality give a clear premium impression that reassures daily. Toyota C‑HR+ has come a long way — the interior looks modern and clean, and its physical climate controls feel sensible — but it still reads a touch more utilitarian in the rear and lower‑trim areas. The iX1’s quieter cabin and more planted presence amplify the premium impression on longer drives, whereas the C‑HR+ uses straightforward ergonomics and fewer touchscreen layers to win points for usability. If surface quality and that “I paid up for this” feeling matter, the iX1 has the edge; if intuitive switches and a tidy, less fussy layout are your priority, the C‑HR+ will feel more straightforward and less attention‑seeking.

iX1

Comfort and long‑distance behavior

On motorways the BMW iX1 comes across as the more composed, quieter companion — its electric drivetrain and wind‑noise control make long stints less tiring, though its suspension can feel firm, especially with larger wheels. The Toyota C‑HR+ is comfortable and relaxed at steady cruise speeds and rewards mixed‑use driving with excellent real‑world efficiency, but its hybrid drivetrain can become audibly busy under strong acceleration. In practice that means the iX1 is better for buyers who spend more time at higher speeds and value silence and stability, while the C‑HR+ suits those who do lots of town and short‑to‑medium commutes and prioritise low running costs. Both are competent on longer trips, but they get there with different compromises: BMW through refinement, Toyota through economy.

C-HR+

Practicality and everyday usability

Practicality is an area where the BMW iX1 shows real strengths: a large, well‑shaped boot and a 40:20:40 split make loading awkward items and family gear easier than in the C‑HR+. The Toyota C‑HR+ pays for its efficient packaging with a smaller, higher‑lip luggage area (especially in PHEV form) and a tighter feeling in the rear seat, which can be awkward with bulky child seats or strollers. In tight garages and urban parking the C‑HR+’s compact footprint and nimble manners feel more forgiving, but the iX1’s parking cameras and assistants level the playing field if you value cargo capacity and flexible cabin layouts. Buyers who prioritise weekend gear, frequent luggage and a more versatile boot will find the iX1 more satisfying; buyers who mostly carry two people and care about running costs will accept the C‑HR+’s compromises.

iX1

City friendliness and daily driving traits

In the city the Toyota C‑HR+ feels at home: easy steering, a smaller turning circle and an efficient hybrid drive make short trips cheap and uncomplicated, and the cabin controls are refreshingly simple. The BMW iX1 remains usable in town thanks to one‑pedal driving and good driver aids, but its larger turn radius and firmer suspension make kerb‑to‑kerb manoeuvres slightly more demanding. The C‑HR+’s PHEV setup rewards owners who can plug in regularly, turning commutes into near‑silent electric runs, while the iX1 delivers the full EV experience without the routine of charging a petrol engine — a different kind of convenience. If most of your miles are urban and you want the lowest day‑to‑day costs, the C‑HR+ is the friendlier choice; if you prefer the simplicity of a full EV and a quieter urban cabin, the iX1 earns that vote.

C-HR+

Who each car suits — clear buyer fit before the numbers

Choose the BMW iX1 if you want a compact EV with a genuinely premium cabin, a roomy and practical boot for family life, and calm, composed long‑distance behavior even if you accept a firmer ride and higher purchase price. Opt for the Toyota C‑HR+ if your priority is urban efficiency, lower running costs when you charge regularly, easier parking and simpler controls, accepting tighter rear seats and a smaller PHEV boot as the trade‑off. Both cars have solid safety and assistance packages, so the decision comes down to whether you favour refinement and luggage flexibility (iX1) or day‑to‑day economy and city agility (C‑HR+). Below you’ll find the technical comparison that quantifies these trade‑offs so you can match the numbers to the lifestyle fit you just read about.

Frequently compared as well

Kia EV3
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The all-electric Kia EV3 feels like the sensible future in a city-friendly SUV shell — roomy, tech-rich and cheaper to run than the Toyota C‑HR+, which still trades on sharp styling and familiar hybrid/petrol simplicity rather than pure EV brilliance. Choose the EV3 for modern gadgets, punchy …
Toyota bZ4X
Toyota C-HR+
VS
This comparison looks at the Toyota bZ4X versus the Toyota C‑HR: both are compact crossovers but take very different approaches — the bZ4X is a purpose‑built all‑electric SUV while the C‑HR is Toyota’s stylish, efficient petrol/hybrid crossover. I’ll run through the key differences in driving range …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

iX1

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Toyota C-HR+ is moderately cheaper – starting at 36,000 £ , while the BMW iX1 costs 42,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,351 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Toyota C-HR+ is only slightly more efficient: consuming 13.4 kWh/100km compared to 14.3 kWh/100km for the BMW iX1. That’s a difference of about 0.9 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Toyota C-HR+ offers slightly more range – reaching up to 607 km, about 93 km more than the BMW iX1.

C-HR+

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Toyota C-HR+ offers marginally more power – delivering 343 HP compared to 313 HP. That’s roughly 30 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Toyota C-HR+ is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 5.2 s, while the BMW iX1 takes 5.6 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the BMW iX1 delivers clearly more torque with 494 Nm compared to 338 Nm. That’s about 156 Nm more.

iX1

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Toyota C-HR+ is only slightly lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 1,940 kg. The difference is around 130 kg.

Looking at boot space, the BMW iX1 offers slightly more boot space – 490 L compared to 416 L. That’s a difference of about 74 L.

When it comes to payload, the Toyota C-HR+ carries markedly more – 655 kg compared to 495 kg. That’s a difference of about 160 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Toyota C-HR+ comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,000
C-HR+

Toyota C-HR+

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 167 - 343 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 458 - 607 km
details
BMW iX1
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

BMW iX1

The BMW iX1 is a compact electric crossover that blends BMW's characteristic driving dynamics with a practical, premium interior, making it a strong choice for buyers who want an upscale daily driver with electric efficiency. It delivers composed handling for city and motorway use, while its clean, modern styling and intuitive tech give the cabin an inviting, contemporary feel.

details
P90488687_highRes_bmw-ix1-xdrive30
P90488684_highRes_bmw-ix1-xdrive30
P90488668_highRes_bmw-ix1-xdrive30
P90465729_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-i
P90465731_highRes_the-first-ever-bmw-i

Reviews BMW iX1

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Roland
27 Apr 2026, 12:37:41

Intuitive to operate, excellent tactile feel, high seating position. More range or a larger battery would be desirable, but that would be nitpicking at the highest level.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
F
22 Apr 2026, 07:16:32

The very large price difference is a major point for me.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
HP
17 Dec 2025, 22:14:02

Delightful driver's car. Light-footed, quick, silent and sporty.
If the range could be improved, it would be absolutely top.
You do have to buy a few option packs to make it fun — expect to pay around 70 grand.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Toyota C-HR+

The Toyota C‑HR is a distinctive crossover that pairs bold, coupe‑like styling with a comfortable, composed ride suited to daily city and suburban driving. It appeals to buyers who value standout design, practical cabin packaging and a refined, easy‑to‑use experience rather than outright performance or rugged off‑road ability.

details
20250312_01_01_s
20250312_01_04_s
20250312_01_15_s
20250312_01_12_s
20250312_01_05_s

Reviews Toyota C-HR+

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Elroq
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Elroq and the Toyota C‑HR comes down to practicality versus personality in the compact crossover class. The Elroq emphasises roomy, clever packaging and value, while the C‑HR focuses on bold styling and efficient drivetrains—pick the Elroq for everyday versatility or the …
Tesla Model Y
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Tesla Model Y and Toyota C-HR represent two different approaches to compact crossovers: the Model Y emphasizes electric range, advanced tech and spacious practicality, while the C-HR focuses on bold styling, efficient combustion options and affordability. This comparison cuts through specs and …
Toyota C-HR
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Deciding between the Toyota C‑HR and the C‑HR+ is about whether you prefer the C‑HR’s balanced efficiency and bold styling or the C‑HR+’s higher trim level with extra equipment and refinement. I’ll compare performance, comfort, features and running costs to help you pick the one that best matches …
Ford Explorer EV
Toyota C-HR+
VS
Big, bold and fully electric, the Ford Explorer EV aims to be the long‑range road trip hero, while the Toyota C‑HR+ packs quirky styling and city‑friendly agility into a compact crossover. Choose Explorer for space and presence, C‑HR+ for economy and personality — and yes, we’ll tell you which one …
Lexus RZ
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The Lexus RZ and Toyota C‑HR+ go head-to-head in a neat showdown of plush electric luxury versus quirky, efficient practicality — one aims for serene, tech-laden refinement, the other hustles value with style. Deciding between them comes down to taste and wallet: do you crave silent sophistication …
CUPRA Tavascan
Toyota C-HR+
VS
The CUPRA Tavascan storms into the compact crossover arena as an electric firebrand with sharp looks and sporty intent, while the Toyota C-HR+ plays the clever, comfort-first contrarian with hybrid thrift and quirky flair. Which one earns your driveway space — the bold, battery-powered Tavascan or …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
BMW iX1
BMW iX2
VS
Comparing the BMW iX1 and BMW iX2 helps buyers choose between a compact electric crossover focused on practicality (iX1) and a slightly sportier, coupe-styled alternative (iX2) that emphasizes style and driving dynamics. Both share BMW’s electric tech and premium fit, but they differ in …
BMW iX1
Toyota C-HR+

Costs and Consumption
Price
42,300 - 55,200 £
Price
36,000 - 46,300 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.3 - 15.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13.4 - 15.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
466 - 514 km
Electric Range
458 - 607 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,940 - 2,085 kg
Curb weight
1,810 - 2,010 kg
Trunk capacity
490 L
Trunk capacity
416 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,845 mm
Width
1,870 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
495 kg
Payload
550 - 655 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 313 HP
Power HP
167 - 343 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.2 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 494 Nm
Torque
268 - 338 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 230 kW
Power kW
123 - 252 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
BMW
Brand
Toyota
What drivetrain options does the BMW iX1 have?

The BMW iX1 is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.