VS

Renault Captur vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (21,100 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Renault Captur or Suzuki S-Cross?

Renault Captur vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

Renault Captur

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • clearly more efficient

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • barely lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Captur

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Captur is marginally cheaper – starting at 21,100 £ , while the Suzuki S-Cross costs 21,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 634 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Renault Captur uses 4.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Suzuki S-Cross with 5.3 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Renault Captur offers markedly more power – delivering 158 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 48 HP more horsepower.

Looking at top speed, the Suzuki S-Cross is marginally faster – reaching 185 km/h, while the Renault Captur tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 5 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Captur delivers slightly more torque with 265 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 30 Nm more.

Captur

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is barely lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,323 kg. The difference is around 43 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki S-Cross offers only slightly more boot space – 430 L compared to 422 L. That’s a difference of about 8 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Renault Captur offers very slightly more capacity – up to 1,363 L, about 133 L more than the Suzuki S-Cross.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Captur carries moderately more – 453 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 48 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Captur is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,100
Captur

Renault Captur

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 115 - 158 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.4 - 6 L/100km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
Suzuki’s compact crossover siblings square off: S-Cross vs Vitara. One leans practical and polished, the other flirts with adventure—let’s find out which Suzuki deserves your driveway and your fuel money.
Renault Captur
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Captur is the practical, pocket-sized crossover that balances frugal running costs, clever packaging and everyday comfort — the sensible choice for buyers who want style without sacrifice. By contrast the Renault Symbioz is a bold electric concept, part living room, part lab car, …
Renault Captur
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Renault Captur

The Renault Captur is a cheeky little crossover that pairs city-friendly agility with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and enough style to turn heads at the lights. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want practical versatility and a dash of personality on their daily drives, without taking itself too seriously.

details
r210470p
r210480p
r210476p
r210485p

Reviews Renault Captur

4.8 (5 Reviews)
rate
Pet
4 Feb 2026, 11:01:12

The car was a very pleasant surprise. Very comfortable and enjoyable. The 1.3 TCe 158 hp engine is brilliant.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Waldemar
1 Feb 2026, 13:55:20

A 2025 mild‑hybrid, 160 hp.
Really nice little car. Mostly doing 200 km trips. Driving isn’t tiring. I trusted the driver‑assistance systems and… I wasn’t disappointed. The adaptive cruise control is brilliant, though I’d trust it about 90%. Overtaking punch is a plus. I recommend it with a clear conscience. Ah, just those 18" wheels 🤦. Obviously fuel consumption is higher because it’s an automatic.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a neatly packaged crossover that puts everyday practicality ahead of showy theatrics, offering a comfortable cabin and predictable handling that suit family life and weekend errands alike. It’s not a headline-grabber, but its sensible packaging, low-key charm and reputation for reliability make it a shrewd choice for buyers who prefer smart value over flash.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Frequently compared as well

Honda HR-V
Renault Captur
VS
The Honda HR-V and Renault Captur go bumper-to-bumper in the small SUV ring, where style, space, and running costs matter more than lap times. We pit Japan’s pragmatic hybrid hero against France’s chic, tech-savvy all-rounder to see which one deserves your driveway—and your monthly payments.
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Captur
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stays the sensible family favourite — roomier, better built and more composed on the motorway, so it’s the pick if you value comfort and practicality without drama. The Renault Captur, meanwhile, charms with bolder styling, clever packaging and nippier city manners (usually for …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Dacia Duster
Renault Captur
VS
Think of the Dacia Duster as the bargain-basement SUV that treats rough roads like a challenge and your wallet like a VIP—rugged, simple and brutally practical. The Renault Captur, by contrast, is the fashion-forward city slicker with sharper looks, more tech and a softer ride, ideal if you want …
Nissan Qashqai
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing a compact SUV is more about lifestyle than just luggage space, and in this matchup the Nissan Qashqai brings glossy tech, a classy cabin and composed road manners. The Suzuki S-Cross counters with sensible packaging, economical engines and value that won’t make your wallet faint — which …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Dacia Sandero
Renault Captur
VS
The Dacia Sandero is the no-nonsense value king—spacious, economical and brutally practical for buyers who want transport, not trinkets. The Renault Captur, by contrast, bundles sharper styling, more tech and a cosier cabin into a compact SUV package, so you pay extra for polish and personality.
Opel Mokka
Renault Captur
VS
The Opel Mokka prowls the urban jungle with bold styling and surprisingly sharp handling that makes it feel like a grown-up compact SUV, while the Renault Captur plays the sensible diplomat with a softer ride, clever cabin tricks and a friendlier fuel bill. Pick the Mokka if you want punchy driver …
Renault Captur
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,100 - 28,400 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
100 - 137 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
Fuel tank capacity
47 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
4,239 mm
Length
4,305 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
1,575 mm
Height
1,580 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,363 L
Max trunk capacity
1,230 L
Payload
447 - 453 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Max Speed
180 - 185 km/h
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Renault
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the Renault Captur have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.