VS

Abarth 500 595 695 vs Volvo EX30 comparison

Compare performance (155 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (32,600 £ vs 30,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Abarth 500 595 695 or Volvo EX30?

Abarth 500 595 695 vs Volvo EX30: Key differences

Abarth 500 595 695

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • noticeably lighter
details

Volvo EX30

3.9 (16 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • substantially more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • significantly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • significantly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

500 595 695

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Volvo EX30 is barely cheaper – starting at 30,000 £ , while the Abarth 500 595 695 costs 32,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2,571 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX30 is marginally more efficient: consuming 17 kWh/100km compared to 17.1 kWh/100km for the Abarth 500 595 695. That’s a difference of about 0.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX30 offers significantly more range – reaching up to 475 km, about 210 km more than the Abarth 500 595 695.

EX30

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 offers substantially more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 155 HP. That’s roughly 273 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Abarth 500 595 695 takes 7 s. That’s about 3.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX30 delivers considerably more torque with 543 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 308 Nm more.

500 595 695

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Volvo EX30 offers more seats – 5 vs 4.

In terms of curb weight, Abarth 500 595 695 is noticeably lighter – 1,410 kg compared to 1,840 kg. The difference is around 430 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo EX30 offers significantly more boot space – 318 L compared to 185 L. That’s a difference of about 133 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX30 carries only slightly more – 390 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX30 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,000
EX30

Volvo EX30

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 428 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 339 - 475 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX30
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Volvo EX30 and Volvo EX40 helps buyers choose between a compact, city-focused electric crossover and a slightly larger, more practical electric SUV. The EX30 prioritises agility, lower cost and urban ease, while the EX40 offers more interior space, range and family-friendly …
Volvo EX30
Kia EV2
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Kia EV2 are compact electric crossovers that balance urban-friendly size with modern tech, safety systems, and strong value propositions. This comparison focuses on range, performance, interior quality, and ownership costs to help you decide which suits your priorities.
Abarth 500 595 695
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Abarth 500 595 695

The Abarth 500, 595 and 695 pack feisty performance and a raucous exhaust character into a cheeky, compact package, blending sharp handling with bold Italian styling and unmistakable personality. They suit drivers who want a playful, driver-focused city car that stands out from the crowd and rewards enthusiastic cornering and personalization.

details
New Abarth 695 Competizione (4)
New Abarth 695 Competizione (2)
New Abarth 695 Competizione (3)
New Abarth 695 Competizione (14)
New Abarth 595
newabarthf595pack-62273022a7f13_6232f53f6a918

Reviews Abarth 500 595 695

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
Mark
19 Sept 2026, 16:53:48

Well I owed the comp 595 for 5 months,this car is really quick.They don’t call it a pocket rocket for nothing.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Tiziano
27 Jul 2026, 21:00:13

Fantastic car ❤️ Thrilling to drive!!!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 is a compact all-electric crossover that mixes Volvo's strong safety focus with clean Scandinavian design for a really city-friendly package. It feels lively and easy to live with, pairing a premium-feeling interior and modern connectivity with a practical footprint for urban driving.

details
313302_Volvo_EX30
313320_Volvo_EX30
313329_Volvo_EX30_interior
313334_Volvo_EX30_interior
313297_Volvo_EX30

Reviews Volvo EX30

3.9 (16 Reviews)
rate
Customer feedback is mixed: many owners praise the EX30 for its compact, modern cabin, secure road manners and lively performance, while others report a more frustrating ownership experience. Typical positives tend to be the car’s packaging, interior design and driving feel; typical negatives often mention the tablet-centric infotainment and driver‑assist behavior being distracting or intrusive, sensitive regen/brake response, and a few reports of range or locking issues. Because comments vary from very positive to quite critical, impressions so far split between buyers who love the car’s simplicity and dynamics and those put off by the software and ergonomics.
Michael
9 Sept 2026, 06:54:15

EX40 is 50% more expensive! That is huge.
Hate the screen on the EX30 so would go for Chinese car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
As
29 Aug 2026, 06:46:24

Mercedes is a conversion. Why does nobody mention that the rear passengers have their legs higher—unnaturally, or that the interior is super cramped because there's a central tunnel from the combustion model? Or slow charging?

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Burkhard Noltmann
28 Jun 2026, 22:00:46

Much cheaper and, as the twin, completely sufficient compared with the Ultra. The cockpit is a bit of an acquired taste.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
V
8 Jun 2026, 10:03:34

Very disappointing overall for a car that comes to €57,500 with options.
After 27,000 km in it over 2 years — so many disappointments...
Despite Volvo’s updates, many “small” problems that ruin daily life:

Mirrors that desynchronize and reset when you open the car.
With the keyless option the car sometimes unlocks when you’re at a distance but won’t open when you try the door.
Intrusive driver aids that become dangerous: they slam the brakes when detecting phantom vehicles while reversing (with a wall behind) or detect vehicles in the lane to our left as a “vehicle coming from the left” (same in roundabouts).
Same issue when overtaking: it lets you pass without problem but then abruptly pushes you back into oncoming traffic when you cross the line to move over.
Screen that stays black or frozen for several tens of seconds at startup.
Performance drops sharply once battery falls below 60%.

Handling is rather mixed: very good when it was new, after two years it develops body roll, tends to overreact in corners (it bounces), and loses grip at the front in roundabouts (for a rear-wheel-drive…).

The engine is overall pleasant and powerful, but the chassis does not at all match the 272 hp.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Maes Ivo
13 May 2026, 21:43:53

Volvo EX30 twin performance is een super handige compacte auto die vast op de weg ligt . Is pijlsnel en je zit iets hoger. Interieur went snel . Ik heb er zelf eentje en ben er verliefd op . Heb BMW G30 gehad . Fantastische auto , maar groot en onhandig . Geef mij maar de Volvo en we zijn maar met 2 .

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX30
VW ID.3
VS
The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact, sharply tuned EV with Scandinavian flair — sprightly, surprisingly premium and built to put a grin on urban commutes. The VW ID.3, by contrast, plays the sensible family card with more interior space, comfort and range options, so pick the EX30 for driving fun …
Volvo EX30
VW ID.Polo
VS
The Volvo EX30 and Volkswagen ID. Polo show two different philosophies for compact electrics: the EX30 emphasizes sporty performance, advanced safety and premium Scandinavian design, while the ID. Polo focuses on everyday practicality, value and efficient city driving. We'll compare range, …
Volvo EX30
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX30 and Volvo XC40 comes down to whether you want a fresh, ultra-compact electric city car or a more conventional, spacious small SUV with broader powertrain choices. The EX30 is a nimble, tech-focused EV that prioritizes efficiency, agility and a lower entry price, …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX30
VS
Unsure whether the Skoda Enyaq or the Volvo EX30 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Volvo EX30
VW ID.4
VS
The Volvo EX30 and VW ID.4 represent two compelling entries in the growing electric SUV market. The EX30 stands out with its sleek Scandinavian design and advanced safety features, while the ID.4 offers a spacious interior and impressive range. Consumers will appreciate the distinct characteristics …
Volvo EX30
CUPRA Raval
VS
The Volvo EX30 and CUPRA Raval are compact premium electric crossovers that take very different approaches to design, tech and driving character. Choosing between them comes down to whether you value Volvo’s safety-focused simplicity and efficient range or CUPRA’s sportier styling and …
BYD Seal
Volvo EX30
VS
The BYD Seal and Volvo EX30 present a compelling face-off in the electric vehicle market, showcasing the unique strengths of both brands. The BYD Seal impresses with its spacious interior and robust range, making it a practical choice for everyday drivers. Meanwhile, the Volvo EX30 emphasizes …
MINI Aceman
Volvo EX30
VS
In the highly anticipated showdown between the MINI Aceman and the Volvo EX30, both electric vehicles bring their unique flair to the compact SUV market. The MINI Aceman captivates with its playful design and nimble handling, embodying the brand's spirited character, while the Volvo EX30 impresses …
Abarth 500 595 695
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
Price
32,600 - 38,600 £
Price
30,000 - 47,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 18.8 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
242 - 265 km
Electric Range
339 - 475 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,410 - 1,435 kg
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
Trunk capacity
185 L
Trunk capacity
318 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,682 mm
Width
1,838 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
370 - 385 kg
Payload
370 - 390 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
155 HP
Power HP
150 - 428 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
235 Nm
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
114 kW
Power kW
110 - 315 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2023
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Abarth
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the Abarth 500 595 695 have?

The Abarth 500 595 695 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.