VS

Skoda Enyaq vs Volvo EX30 comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (41,900 £ vs 33,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Enyaq or Volvo EX30?

Skoda Enyaq vs Volvo EX30: Key differences

Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more efficient
  • somewhat more electric range
  • considerably more trunk space

Volvo EX30

3.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
  • slightly lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Video - Skoda Enyaq

Video Thumbnail
▶

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Enyaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Volvo EX30 is visibly cheaper – starting at 33,000 £ , while the Skoda Enyaq costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,923 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Skoda Enyaq is moderately more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 17 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX30. That’s a difference of about 2.2 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Enyaq offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 587 km, about 111 km more than the Volvo EX30.

EX30

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 offers visibly more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 88 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Enyaq delivers visibly more torque with 679 Nm compared to 543 Nm. That’s about 136 Nm more.

Enyaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo EX30 is slightly lighter – 1,840 kg compared to 2,179 kg. The difference is around 339 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers considerably more boot space – 585 L compared to 318 L. That’s a difference of about 267 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries visibly more – 489 kg compared to 390 kg. That’s a difference of about 99 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX30 sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £33,000
EX30

Volvo EX30

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 272 - 428 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 339 - 476 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Skoda Enyaq vs Skoda Elroq: the seasoned EV family hauler squares up to the fresh-faced compact crossover in a duel for your driveway. Same sensible Czech DNA, but which one nails the sweet spot of space, range, and value without draining your budget—or your patience?
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
The Skoda Enyaq plays the sensible family EV: calm, roomy and beautifully screwed together, while the Kia EV5 turns up with concept-car swagger, smart storage and value that’ll have accountants smiling. If you want long-haul refinement and a cavernous boot, pick the Enyaq; if bold design, generous …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a cleverly packaged electric SUV that blends roomy, pragmatic family space with clean, Czech design and sensible value. On the road it’s unshowy but composed, offering serene electric performance and easy-to-use tech — the kind of car that makes daily life smoother without trying too hard.

details
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117406
SKODA_ENYAQ_COUPÃ_iV_118256
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117395
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117410
SKODA_ENYAQ_iV_80X_117400

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.5 (4 Reviews)
rate
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo EX30

The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.

details
313302_Volvo_EX30
313320_Volvo_EX30
313329_Volvo_EX30_interior
313334_Volvo_EX30_interior
313297_Volvo_EX30

Reviews Volvo EX30

3.6 (5 Reviews)
rate
Michael
10 Feb 2026, 21:18:58

...the best electric car we've driven so far. Trouble-free, safe, tidy and easy to use.

The German predecessors (the Wolfsburg group) can be completely forgotten!

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Julien B.
10 Feb 2026, 15:47:03

A car that could have been brilliant, ruined by technological dogmatism. Ninety‑five percent of this car’s problems are between the windshield and the steering wheel. The positives are undone by a botched implantation of technology at all costs. Basic functions are hard to access, buried in menus, and the constant, useless warnings and alerts make the experience frustrating and wreck the overall ergonomics. Add recurring issues with the door‑locking system that the dealer can’t fix after several visits, a range far below what’s promised, and a collision‑avoidance system that randomly takes dangerous initiatives, and I can say this is the worst car I’ve ever bought. After several months, I deeply regret this purchase.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Marco
30 Dec 2025, 12:53:45

The onboard tech (tablet) takes too long to learn. It distracts from driving. Not suitable for the nearsighted — the tablet’s distance from your eyes basically forces you to wear trifocals. Letting off the gas slows the car, but it’s overly sensitive and you need time to get used to it. The buzzer for exceeding the speed limit is very annoying, and the system notices changes in road signs late. In short: driving it is stressful.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
NickoNamo
22 Dec 2025, 18:10:11

Compact, attractive and—above all—safe car with a modern interior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
CUPRA Tavascan
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Between the showy CUPRA Tavascan and the sensible Skoda Enyaq you get adrenaline and design versus roominess and value — the Tavascan is a sporty, design-led EV that prioritises engagement, while the Enyaq is a spacious, pragmatic family SUV with sensible range and a friendlier price of entry. Pick …
Skoda Enyaq
BYD Sealion 7
VS
Skoda Enyaq is the sensible, family-friendly EV — roomy, comfortably composed and refreshingly free of gimmicks, the sort of car that quietly makes everyday life easier. BYD Sealion 7, by contrast, trades conservatism for style and tech, offering punchy electric performance and impressive value …
CUPRA Born
Volvo EX30
VS
In the battle of electric compacts, the CUPRA Born and Volvo EX30 each bring unique strengths to the table for eco-conscious drivers. The CUPRA Born impresses with its sporty design and dynamic handling, making it an ideal choice for those seeking a spirited drive. On the other hand, the Volvo EX30 …
Skoda Karoq
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Unsure whether the Skoda Karoq or the Skoda Enyaq is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.4
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and VW ID.4 are two formidable contenders in the electric SUV market, each offering a unique blend of practicality and innovation. The Enyaq impresses with its spacious interior and clever use of technology, making it a family-friendly choice with a touch of sophistication. …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Škoda Enyaq is the pragmatic, spacious crossover that prioritises family-friendly practicality and sensible value—think a huge boot, simple controls and a comfy ride that happily survives school runs and weekend getaways. The VW ID.7 is a sleeker, more aerodynamic tourer with better …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
The Ford Explorer EV and Skoda Enyaq present a compelling match-up in the growing electric SUV market, each offering an impressive blend of performance and versatility. While the Explorer EV boasts a spacious interior and a robust powertrain, the Enyaq stands out with its strong emphasis on …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX30

Costs and Consumption
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
Price
33,000 - 49,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
Electric Range
339 - 476 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
49 - 65 kWh
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Trunk capacity
318 L
Length
-
Length
4,233 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Width
1,838 mm
Height
-
Height
1,550 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,000 L
Payload
443 - 489 kg
Payload
370 - 390 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 5.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Enyaq have?

Available configurations include Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.