Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Alpine A290 vs Jeep Avenger - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (218 HP vs 156 HP), boot space and price (33200 £ vs 21900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A290 or Jeep Avenger?
A290
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Jeep Avenger has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21900 £ , while the Alpine A290 costs 33200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11229 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Jeep Avenger: with 15.50 kWh per 100 km, it’s hardly perceptible more efficient than the Alpine A290 with 15.80 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.30 kWh.
As for electric range, the Jeep Avenger performs minimal better – achieving up to 400 km, about 20 km more than the Alpine A290.
Avenger
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A290 has a noticeable edge – offering 218 HP compared to 156 HP. That’s roughly 62 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Jeep Avenger takes 9 s. That’s about 2.60 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Jeep Avenger performs slightly better – reaching 194 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 24 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Alpine A290 pulls somewhat stronger with 300 Nm compared to 260 Nm. That’s about 40 Nm difference.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Jeep Avenger is distinct lighter – 1180 kg compared to 1554 kg. The difference is around 374 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Jeep Avenger offers to a small extent more room – 380 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 54 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Jeep Avenger performs to a small extent better – up to 1277 L, which is about 171 L more than the Alpine A290.
When it comes to payload, Jeep Avenger noticeable takes the win – 502 kg compared to 396 kg. That’s a difference of about 106 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Jeep Avenger holds a solid overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Alpine A290
Jeep Avenger
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £21,900
Jeep Avenger
Alpine A290
5 (1 Reviews)
The Alpine A290 brings Alpine's racing-bred spirit to the road with taut handling, razor-sharp steering and a compact, cheeky silhouette that's impossible to ignore. It's a car for drivers who want pure fun rather than family practicality — a playful, stylish pocket rocket that makes every back road feel like a racetrack and hands out smiles with the key.
details
Jeep Avenger
4.2 (4 Reviews)
The Jeep Avenger shrinks Jeep's boxy, adventurous styling into a city-friendly electric crossover that looks just as at home on tight streets as it does on muddy weekend lanes. It's a savvy pick for drivers who want go-anywhere attitude without the truck-size ego — practical inside, lively around town and ready to tackle a bit of rough stuff when the mood strikes.
details
Alpine A290
Jeep Avenger
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33200 - 39600 £
|
Price
21900 - 36900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.7 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.50 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
|
Electric Range
400 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 129 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
44 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1554 kg
|
Curb weight
1180 - 1520 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
326 L
|
Trunk capacity
325 - 380 L
|
|
Length
3990 mm
|
Length
4084 - 4088 mm
|
|
Width
1820 mm
|
Width
1776 mm
|
|
Height
1520 mm
|
Height
1527 - 1541 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1218 - 1277 L
|
|
Payload
396 kg
|
Payload
494 - 502 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
|
Power HP
100 - 156 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 10.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
|
Max Speed
150 - 194 km/h
|
|
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
|
Torque
205 - 260 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
|
Power kW
74 - 115 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1199 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2023 - 2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D, C
|
|
Brand
Alpine
|
Brand
Jeep
|
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.