@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Alpine A290 vs Mazda CX-80 – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Alpine A290 or Mazda CX-80 fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Alpine A290 has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 33200 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 15043 £.

As for range, the Alpine A290 performs decisively better – achieving up to 380 km, about 319 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a noticeable edge – offering 327 HP compared to 218 HP. That’s roughly 109 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A290 is barely noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.40 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs noticeable better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Alpine A290 tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 49 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-80 pulls significantly stronger with 550 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers evident more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Alpine A290 is decisively lighter – 1479 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 652 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Alpine A290 offers noticeable more room – 326 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 68 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs decisively better – up to 1971 L, which is about 865 L more than the Alpine A290.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 evident takes the win – 650 kg compared to 471 kg. That’s a difference of about 179 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-80 shows itself to be shows small but notable strengths and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £48,200
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 5.8 L
  • Electric Range : 61 km
details

Alpine A290

5 (1)
rate

The Alpine A290 embodies a thrilling blend of modern design and exhilarating performance, capturing the spirit of the brand's racing heritage. With its agile handling and responsive drive, this compact vehicle promises an engaging experience both on the road and the track. Inside, it features a driver-focused cockpit that seamlessly integrates technology and comfort, making every journey an adventure.

details
alpinea290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
Alpine A290
Mazda CX-80
A290 @ Alpine / Renault Group Media
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
33200 - 39600 £
Price
48200 - 60200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 16.5 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
364 - 380 km
Electric Range
61 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
35 - 151 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
7
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1479 kg
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Trunk capacity
326 L
Trunk capacity
258 L
Length
3997 mm
Length
4995 mm
Width
1823 mm
Width
1890 mm
Height
1512 mm
Height
1714 mm
Max trunk capacity
1106 L
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
Payload
471 kg
Payload
649 - 650 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
177 - 218 HP
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Max Speed
160 - 170 km/h
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
Torque
285 - 300 Nm
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Power kW
130 - 160 kW
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Mazda

Similar Comparisons

@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
In the exciting showdown between the Alpine A290 and the iconic Renault R5, enthusiasts are treated to a fascinating blend of modern engineering and classic charm. The A290 boasts cutting-edge performance and advanced technology, while the R5 captivates with its nostalgic allure and timeless …
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Born
VS
The Alpine A290 and CUPRA Born compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
@ Audi AG
Audi A3 Sportback
VS
Alpine A290 and Audi A3 Sportback go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 and Volvo XC60 stand out with their distinct approaches to luxury and practicality. The CX-80 impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, making it a favorite for those who prioritize performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Touareg
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Touareg, the Mazda shines with its sleek design and fuel-efficient performance that appeals to drivers seeking both aesthetics and economy. Conversely, the Touareg stands out by offering a luxurious interior and robust powertrain options that cater …
@ BMW Group Press
BMW X5
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the realm of luxury SUVs, the BMW X5 offers a blend of performance and opulence with its powerful engine options, refined interior, and cutting-edge technology. On the other hand, the new Mazda CX-80 presents a compelling alternative, delivering a spacious yet elegant cabin and Mazda's signature …
@ Alpine / Renault Group Media
Alpine A290
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX30
VS
In the thrilling matchup between the Alpine A290 and the Volvo EX30, driving enthusiasts will appreciate the Alpine A290 for its nimble handling and spirited performance, embodying the classic French flair in a compact hatchback form. On the other hand, the Volvo EX30 stands out with its …
Is the Alpine A290 offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.