VS

Alpine A390 vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (470 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (57,900 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Alpine A390 or Renault Arkana?

Alpine A390 vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

Alpine A390

  • considerably more power
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

A390

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Renault Arkana is clearly cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Alpine A390 costs 57,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 29,400 £.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Alpine A390 offers considerably more power – delivering 470 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 327 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Alpine A390 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 6.9 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Alpine A390 delivers substantially more torque with 824 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 619 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is significantly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 2,121 kg. The difference is around 611 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Alpine A390 carries only slightly more – 484 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 33 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Alpine A390 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £57,900
A390

Alpine A390

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 400 - 470 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.7 - 20.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 497 - 551 km
details

Frequently compared as well

BMW i4
Alpine A390
VS
The BMW i4 and the Alpine A390 are two very different propositions: the i4 delivers electric-powered refinement and everyday usability, while the Alpine A390 focuses on lightweight, driver-focused sportiness. This comparison will cut through the noise so you can quickly see which car better matches …
Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
Here’s a straightforward comparison between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Symbioz to help you decide which fits your needs. The Arkana is a production compact crossover focused on practicality and hybrid efficiency, while the Symbioz is Renault’s forward-looking electric concept showcasing …
Alpine A390
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Alpine A390

The Alpine A390 is the brand’s leap into the fast electric crossover arena, wrapping Dieppe’s lightweight ethos in a sleek, coupe-ish body with real everyday usability. If the steering and chassis feel echo the A110, this could be the enthusiast’s family EV—subtle, sharp, and très chic, with enough theatre to make the school run feel like a pit lane exit.

details
serpimg_Yl24Nh

Reviews Alpine A390

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
Choosing between the Renault Arkana and the Renault Austral comes down to whether you want a coupe‑styled compact SUV that prioritises flair and efficiency (Arkana) or a more conventional family SUV that emphasises space and refinement (Austral). This comparison will cut through the marketing to …
Polestar 4
Alpine A390
VS
The Polestar 4 and Alpine A390 represent two very different takes on performance and style: the Polestar 4 is a polished, tech-rich electric crossover focused on everyday comfort and efficiency, while the Alpine A390 prioritizes a lightweight, driver-focused sports-car experience. Choosing between …
Renault Rafale
Alpine A390
VS
The Renault Rafale and the Alpine A390 pit two different approaches to sporty French motoring against each other: the Rafale leans toward a sleek, tech-rich grand-tourer crossover, while the A390 is aimed at lightweight, driver-focused performance in traditional Alpine fashion. This comparison will …
Renault Arkana
Renault Captur
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Captur are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want a blend of stylish design, efficient engines and everyday practicality. The Arkana leans into a sleeker coupe‑SUV look and a firmer driving feel, while the Captur favours flexible interior packaging and …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on Renault's crossover line-up: the Arkana is a compact, value-focused coupe-SUV, while the Rafale aims higher as a larger, more premium fastback crossover packed with technology. This comparison strips away the marketing to help …
Renault Arkana
Toyota C-HR
VS
Renault Arkana and Toyota C-HR go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Peugeot 408
Renault Arkana
VS
In the burgeoning world of crossover SUVs, the Peugeot 408 and Renault Arkana both offer distinctive styles and robust performance. The Peugeot 408 captivates with its sharp design and intuitive technology features, providing a smooth yet dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana …
Ford Kuga
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive crossover SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Renault Arkana present two distinct approaches to style and capability. The Ford Kuga impresses with its versatile engine options and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for family-oriented buyers. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana …
Alpine A390
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
57,900 - 66,900 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 20.4 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
497 - 551 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,121 - 2,124 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
532 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,885 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
481 - 484 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
400 - 470 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 4.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
661 - 824 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
295 - 345 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Alpine
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Alpine A390 have?

The Alpine A390 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.