Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Audi A6 e-tron Avant vs Skoda Enyaq comparison
Compare performance (551 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (55,200 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi A6 e-tron Avant or Skoda Enyaq?
Audi A6 e-tron Avant vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Video - Skoda Enyaq
A6 e-tron Avant
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Skoda Enyaq is visibly cheaper – starting at 41,900 £ , while the Audi A6 e-tron Avant costs 55,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13,328 £.
When it comes to electricity consumption, both models perform equally – each averaging 14.8 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers moderately more range – reaching up to 716 km, about 129 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.
Enyaq
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant offers markedly more power – delivering 551 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 211 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.9 s, while the Skoda Enyaq takes 5.4 s. That’s about 1.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi A6 e-tron Avant delivers clearly more torque with 855 Nm compared to 679 Nm. That’s about 176 Nm more.
A6 e-tron Avant
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Skoda Enyaq is only slightly lighter – 2,179 kg compared to 2,185 kg. The difference is around 6 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers a bit more boot space – 585 L compared to 502 L. That’s a difference of about 83 L.
When it comes to payload, the Audi A6 e-tron Avant carries only slightly more – 500 kg compared to 489 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £55,200
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
The Audi A6 e-tron Avant wraps Audi's trademark refinement into a sleek electric estate that looks at home in the city or on the open road. Inside it's grown-up and tech-forward with practical packaging for family life, delivering a composed, confident drive that makes everyday hauling feel a bit more special and slightly futuristic.
details
Skoda Enyaq
The Skoda Enyaq is a reassuring, family‑first electric SUV that trades sporting drama for exceptional quiet, roomy rear seats and a genuinely practical boot. It’s remarkably easy to live with thanks to sensible controls and steady fast charging, though the touchscreen‑led infotainment can be sluggish and driving enthusiasts looking for sharp handling should look elsewhere.
details
Audi A6 e-tron Avant
Skoda Enyaq
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
55,200 - 100,100 £
|
Price
41,900 - 52,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 17 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
539 - 716 km
|
Electric Range
538 - 587 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
75.8 - 94.9 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,185 - 2,410 kg
|
Curb weight
2,179 - 2,293 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
502 L
|
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
|
|
Length
4,928 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,923 mm
|
Width
1,879 mm
|
|
Height
1,504 - 1,527 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,422 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
470 - 500 kg
|
Payload
443 - 489 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
326 - 551 HP
|
Power HP
286 - 340 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.9 - 6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
435 - 855 Nm
|
Torque
545 - 679 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
240 - 405 kW
|
Power kW
210 - 250 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Audi
|
Brand
Skoda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.